TYB
Kek
Kek. Looks like they're cutting loose ends before the erections.
>no we don't
>he does not speak for the uk the fucking pankawallay.
Good to know. Is the general consensus with the general public that your government is full of shit as well?
Indeed. My cook off time is Nov 5th. When they pull shenanigans, assuming they don't try to do it before the elections, that's go time.
>anon can give it until the 20th jan 2025.
Trump can't take office, no matter the cost. If they lose Nov 5th, they'll burn it all down, before they give him the keys again. It's got to be obvious that they don't have the numbers. Even with the the illegals they brought into vote, they don't have the numbers to pump and dump and a bait and switch by replacing Biden at the DNC convention, won't sway anyone that's not far leftist, which is the smallest of all factions.
They can't allow an election under any circumstances.
>it's not up to them to 'allow' what is going to happen.
Of course, but they're not going to give up control easily.
>'they' are hirelings who think that they've succeeded in becoming 'job for life' despots.
Kek. That's easily surmised by merely contacting your "representative" and telling them your views on a particular upcoming bill. They could give two shits what their constituents want. They only care about what the lobbyists have to say, 'cos they come with paper. Every western government is that way.
>They have to follow tradition or risk what not allowing elections will bring to them swiftly.
I think it's becoming clear to them that they've lost, but they also know what treason entails. They willingly made the choice to join the coup. They now realized they've lost, but they don't want to pay the price for their actions.
>who gave lulunatic a security clearance to be on the ballot as a choice - THAT IS WHO FUCKED BRAZil
>Trump is heavily pro-zionist though…
Of course. Everything has to be controlled by them. Kek. Why else do you think RampRat had to delete my poast about America throwing of Zionist rule?
>Or maybe you are one of the Media Matters shills that keeps infesting the place like a roach nest?
Kek. That's projection. Perhaps I'm tired of Jewish money being involved in American politics? Maybe I really amAmerica First? Maybe I think muh "Greatest Ally" (tm), Israel can go fuck itself, after it pays back, with interest, the near 300 billion it's grifted off American taxpayers since it's inception? Maybe I want a level playing field for all Americans, irrespective of "race," "ethnicity" or "religion," but want to have a serious talk about why Jews in America receive special protections over all other groups in America? Maybe I want to discuss the discrepancies in the (alleged) "Holocaust" (tm) narrative of World War II? Maybe I want to have an open discussion about "religious ideology" (tm), as a whole, but specifically the supremacist belief system of Judaism?
You seemBIG MADthat exercising my rights to talk about whatever the fuck I want. Deleting my poasts won't stop me. As a matter of fact, it only makes me want to talk about it more. Kek, but sure, I work for David Brock.
>stop noticing post deletions!
>ramprat has slated your post to be holocausted
>do not mention zionism or ***s
Kek. They'll never shut me up. The djinn has already been released. They can't stop it. No one can. Kek. They fucked around…. they're going to find out.
"Saving Israel for last……"
>who knows why, anon but
>that behavior does indicate something
>that if we say it . . .
>well.
I want to have an open discussion about "religious idealism" (tm). All these "Godly" types, especially when it comes to the Abrahamic Triumvirate, they feel it's their "right" to project their religious beliefs upon people, even if they're not of the same faith. You see it all the time, when these asshats do the whole, "I'm a good [insert religious ideology here] and this bill goes againstMYbeliefs, so I voted "no."
The simple fact, however, is we are absolutely restricted on all levels from discussingonesub-group of our species in any capacity, if it's in the negative. Even here. They even have a code word they use to end discussions they do not like: anti-Semite. An "anti-Semite" isn't a person who hates Jews. It's people Jews hate. You're not allowed to talk about Jews pretending to be White to spread anti-White vitriol. You're not allowed to talk about Jews calling for "White Genocide." You're not allowed to talk about how the Jewish religion says that all non-Jews are "beasts in human form." The discussion of Jews is quite frankly, verbum non-grata, but when I ask why, I'm always met with the same response: "anti-Semite."
I want a level playing field, for everyone, where the law is applied equally. For some reason, those beliefs are "anti-Semitisms" (tm). Ironic, no?
Kek. Seriously. Is itREALLYso bad to say, "Hey, I'm not cool with all this Jewish influence in American politics? They don't represent the majority, yet they seem to be calling the shots for everyone. Also, I'm not on board with the Israeli government. I don't like how they handle things in the Middle East and after 70 years of fucking dealing with them, I think it's time they put on their big boy pants, repay the money they've sponged off Americans and go their own way."
Nope. Not allowed to have that opinion. Not even here.
Holy fuck. You're like an IMAX theatre, there's so much projection. If you have a pair, refute my argument in debate. You do have a pair, don't you?