>>20694450 lb/pb Scripture is a palimpsest
> saintly men of the past, Saul being one who was wise and is worth reading.
One who never knew Jesus. He writes well, and was well-travelled, and professed to know the Christ quite convincingly. Alas, Paul is not a primary source. He can only attempt to 'decode' Jesus, like timestampfags on /qresearch who missed the original drops.
>Jesus blinded him and spoke to him and told him to travel on.
Paul never knew Jesus, Anon. I'd rather trust a second-hand account of the Sermon on the Mount. The accounts of the words and deeds of Jesus are much more significant in knowing Him than the fever dreams of someone who never met Him.
> ignoring important scripture
On the contrary, the entire body of available Hebrew and Greek Christian scriptures have been carefully considered over many decades, Anon. Proceed as you will.
>Are you sure you've considered everything?
No, of course not. I'm learning like everyone else.
If baptism conferred knowledge and authority all would be saints.
Being shipwrecked and snakebit and jailed and persecuted make for a remarkable story. Paul's sacrifices to spread the word are inspirational. His tenacity and committment set a very high standard.
His story, however, is not that of a person who personally knew Jesus.
His writings reflect that.
>The earth turns and balances on its edge.
Agreed! 'Eclipse' means 'two-sided coin' in ancient Mesopotamian. Just because the Earth is flat doesn't mean it can't cast a rounded shadow.
>Show Anon in the Constitution where Federal Bureau Of Investigations is In the Constitution? Not just smart ass remarks.
The US Constitution creates three branches of government and entrusts representatives of We the People with the responsibility to govern this land. Elected and appointed representatives passed laws, under their constitutional authority - and with the consent of the people, that established the FBI. It is quite simple.
>I got one for you. What gives the federal government authority to restrict people from consuming a plant?
(You) do, Anon. (You).
>'consent of the people' is a big lie, anon. you know this.
The appearance of consent is as useful as consent, if you can somehow create the appearance of consent.
Not a shill. Does not require an amendment.
The creation of government agencies only requires the agreement of your dutifully elected and appointed representatives. They write, pass, and adjudicate the laws of these United States according to the Constitution. They fund the agencies they create as well.
Regardless of your emotions or wishes the FBI is going to be considered an organization that was constitutionally created by your appointed representatives, Anon. If it is your wish to eliminate or defeat the FBI or any other agency created by the Federal government it is best to accept the reality that at the time these agencies were created the law was followed - even if the lawmakers were bought and paid for. The agencies, their creation, their funding, and their operations have been constitutionally tested by the USSC via numerous precedent-setting cases. The judge is not going to listen to your argument about the Constitution, the judge is going to sentence your ass.
In spite of your assertion - which Anon agrees with - the Congress made use of the Constitution's 'Interstate Commerce Clause' to spread Federal power and federal regulations. Although we agree such power is not enumerated, the power has been seized. We are subject to it.
Lower court judges do not care for esoteric legal arguments. Such judges follow legal code in effect at the time of the case under consideration. Good like playing the odds of a Certoriari hearing at the USSC, Anon.
>Executive Order of President Roosevelt
An elected or appointed representative of the people, Anon.
>If the government seized the power then it is treasonous
Understood.
Word of advice?
Don't lean over the line on the floor in Booking.
Neither the beat cops, field FBI, Transport Officers, nor the Corrections Officers will pay any attention to Constitutional arguments, no matter how eloquent, when you are charged in violation of established legal code.
Lots of youtube videos confirm.
Your legal theories and justifications mean nothing to the lower courts. Getting a case appealed to the USSC to argue Constitutional law is an exceedingly long shot.
Even if you are righteous the COs in Booking can't help you.
You are mistaken. Regardless of our opinions there are laws on the books that we are forced to recognize. We fail to recognize those laws at our own peril. You can yell 'Attica!' at the judge, too. It's all just theater and then your cell door slams shut.
Appeals take many years.
Of course, should we elect to overthrow the current system all that changes.
US Citizen.
How else did a law get adopted, Anon, if not for the consent of the majority of voters in a representative Republic?
The corruption, blackmail, and treason have not yet become public. The laws on the books are presumed Constitutional until proven otherwise. Therefore the laws in US, State, and Local Codes are presumed Constitutional and Anons break them at their own peril despite arguments about 'Muh Constitution'.
Maegan's not lonely anymore!
Ex-Tennessee cop Maegan Hall, fired over sex trysts with 6 other officers, settles fed lawsuit that will cost city whopping $500K
https://nypost.com/2024/03/21/us-news/tennessee-sex-scandal-cop-maegan-hall-settles-federal-lawsuit-for-500k/
That's close to what 'I don't feel fresh' has always meant: "Muh buttcheeks are welded together". No TOGTFO.
>Korea in 1950
Mom became a 19-year-old widow that November after General MacArthur defied President Truman and sent US soldiers (17th IR in X Corp) towards the Yalu.
For her Mac was the original 'No Name'.