I got one for you. What gives the federal government authority to restrict people from consuming a plant?
Voting is the peoples consent. They're given controlled "options" so WHAT they vote doesn't matter, only THAT they vote and therefor consent to government.
Yes, voting IS consent. When you vote in their system you consent to their system. You do not "throw off" a corrupt destructive government system by voting in that corrupt destructive government system.
The government is blatantly violating the constitution in multiple ways and has been for years, but people happily go along voting for that government.
When you vote in their system, you consent to their system.
>We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from theconsent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
>I've posted a lot of bullshit
Ever wonder why you're so triggered by the fact that voting in a system is consenting to a system?
Sounds like Indiana is doing it right. We had a common law right long recognized even by the Supreme Court to use force against police trying to unlawfully arrest you. That was before they decided it's "bad law" and you no longer have that right.
I argue it's covered under your right to be secure in your person, houses, papers and effects. If cops aren't violating the law they should have nothing to worry about. If they're lawless tyrants they should get what's coming to them.
ACTORS are ACTING.