Ok Anons. So I'm hearing some of you for and some against this " forbidden" article about Anons and Q. I just took a minute and read it…. It's not bad. It actually puts us in a good light. Not 100% accurate, but I like that we weren't just called insane. Maybe it's just the beginning of good coverage for us all…
Yes. That paragraph made me cringe. It's false. Completely! But I pushed past that and read the rest. The rest was ok, and even mostly true… Do you think that the writer just fucked up, or that the Anon he interviewed was stupid or a newbie?
We are for 100% truth, so I see how most Anons think that article is bullshit , but overall, it's the first time we were put in a good light. It's not like it changes much, but it was nice. I don't think it should be in the permanent dough, but notables should be ok. We put articles mentioning us as crazies in the notables. Kek..