But, Pruitt resigned so doesn't that mean he's no longer eligible? I mean he WAS Senate approved but no longer has a position "elsewhere" in the Exec branch like Q's info says you need to be.
But, Pruitt resigned so doesn't that mean he's no longer eligible? I mean he WAS Senate approved but no longer has a position "elsewhere" in the Exec branch like Q's info says you need to be.
Q's info says "[holding] Senate confirmed position". Pruitt quit so he's not [holding] anything.
I don't think they're shills, but anons that like to put up side/side drawrings without drawing any logical inferences. We weren't expecting questions not prepared for that types.
My deduction is that Q said "([like] Scott Pruitt)" as a misdirection he wanted to use. They sure did amp up the attacks on him again prior to the resignation.
>what true anon could be butt hurt about this being a notable?
You don't understand how Notables work here. They are battle prizes. As soon as BAKER NOTABLE goes up it's a Battle Royale. We'll see who wins next bread when the eagerly awaited Notable winners are made official.