Anonymous ID: b7d501 April 8, 2024, 1:36 p.m. No.20698203   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8228 >>8352 >>8400 >>8412

>>20698082

KanekoaTheGreat

@KanekoaTheGreat

Glenn Greenwald Rants About Brazil's Alexandre De Moraes' Authoritarian Censorship Regime Citing The New York Times

 

"The Brazilian left hated him until he took on the role of chief censor and began censoring, apparently, almost everybody who the Brazilian left regarded as their enemy."

 

"Especially, Bolsanaro supporters. Including ordering members of Congress arrested and journalists having their homes searched and seized, and now he's a hero to the Brazilian left."

 

"If you question this judge, you will be called a defender of fascism even though what this judge is most known for is this very extreme censorship regime that was even a bridge too far for the New York Times."

 

"Mr. Moraes has jailed five people without a trial for posts on social media that he said attacked Brazil's institutions. He didn't order them censored. He ordered them jailed with no trial."

 

"The only time in my entire career as a journalist that I have ever wondered if I should really be questioning, challenging, or critiquing a political official is this person, who has gone so far as to order people to be imprisoned without a trial for criticizing him."

 

"If you criticize Alexandre De Moraes, you get banned or perhaps imprisoned, which is why I spent every second up until this show started on the phone with my lawyers."

 

"Alexandre De Moraes is the target of people's criticism, so in his view, he's the victim of people's illegal speech. He then initiates his own legal process to get these people arrested or censored, and then he sits as the judge in his own case—a case that he himself initiated. A case that he considers himself the victim. Then, he judges these people guilty and orders them to be arrested or banned from the internet."

 

"Do you know how repressive a censorship regime has to be for the New York Times to write an article like this? Regardless of how authoritarian or repressive you think Bolsanaro is, the institutions acting against him, in particular this Supreme Court, have become more repressive."

 

The full episode with

@ggreenwald

is below. VIDEO

Anonymous ID: b7d501 April 8, 2024, 1:44 p.m. No.20698236   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8332

>>20698190

RAPTURE is a word which doesn't appear in scripture. It's a contrived description of an event which doesn't habben the way rapture misinterprets it. All events are described to habben here on earth. No one is going anywhere.

Anonymous ID: b7d501 April 8, 2024, 2:05 p.m. No.20698310   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8334 >>8357 >>8360 >>8400 >>8412

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

@MRobertsQLD

·

16h

Who was the Australian scientist?

 

For which agency did they work?

 

CSIRO?

https://twitter.com/MRobertsQLD/status/1777197996742255060

 

Peter Daszak was the scientist, Eco Health Alliance in cooperation with the CIA/DAARPA, was the agency. CSIRO may be involved, like the Doherty Institute in Melbourne which received serum samples from Ukraine biolab.

 

Camus

@newstart_2024

Senator Rand Paul: "So one of the cool things I have discovered about Covid-19 is, they borrowed Oracle supercomputer, a scientist from Australia and the wanted to see which animal that virus would attach best to….it didn't attach to any animals very well but it attached perfectly to humans. This does not happen, it's almost proof positive that this was manipulated in a lab. And what you do in a lab is you actually speed up evolution and you direct evolution, because you keep infecting mice that have human lung markers, so it thinks it's infecting a human lung and you do it over and over again, you get the sickest mouse, one with the highest viral load you take that out and you infect the mice again. And each time you pass it through the virus you get the sickest and the most infected mouse and you do it again. You're selecting for the worst, the most deadly, the most efficiently…What really was sort of the smoking gun though is we discovered that the way the virus is genetically constructed is virtually identical to a research project from 2018 that had dr. Baric from UNC, dr. Shi from Wuhan and dr. Peter Daszak from New York. They actually applied for money to create something that looks very suspiciously like Covid-19. They didn't get the money for it, but almost everybody believes now that dr. Shi went ahead in China and did that project, created that virus, probably to create a vaccine, probably was an accident that had leaked out. But we have all of this evidence now and yet it's been like pulling teeth to get a Democrat anywhere in congress to sign even a records release…"

Source: The Highwire with Del Bigtree (Rumble)

https://twitter.com/newstart_2024/status/1777066433064681763

 

Video Rand Paul…

Anonymous ID: b7d501 April 8, 2024, 2:09 p.m. No.20698334   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8400 >>8412

>>20698310

Australian Scientist who used super computer to detect man made virus status.

 

Here's Professor Nikolai Petrovski, vaccine expert and inventor from South Australia. Rand Paul just discussed his work about the virus binding to Human ACE2 better than other animals. It was perfectly adapted from day 1.

 

Humanspective

@Humanspective

This is not common knowledge. Professor Nikolai Petrovski, vaccine inventor in South Australia, just a few weeks into the Pandemic, new confidently that the virus was probably man made.

 

To the amazement of Dr Drew in this podcast from 10 x months ago, who thought it was new research, Nikolai Petrovski discusses how in "The first few week of 2020, when the viral sequence was first released" he was only "modelling the virus to build a vaccine".

 

The other clip is from an AMPS seminar held just over a year ago, which works in well with the DR Drew clip.

 

"If it's come from an animal source, then there should be an animal out there who's ACE2 binds better to the virus than Human ACE2, [but] rather than finding some exotic animal at the top of the list, we found Humans"[and it was] so well human adapted.

 

"It took a long time to get published, because the narrative was, that [it] was not an acceptable question to be asking."

https://twitter.com/Humanspective/status/1770644296167047471

Anonymous ID: b7d501 April 8, 2024, 2:14 p.m. No.20698357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8400 >>8412

>>20698310

Humanspective

@Humanspective

·

Mar 23

"In silico comparison of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species and implications for virus origin". - Nikolai Petrovsky

https://twitter.com/Humanspective/status/1771498776668041364

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-92388-5