PDJT's Immunity Brief before Supreme Court has brought out a war to submit as many Amicus Brief's to the SC opposing Trump's immunity claim. There have been at least, 45 YES 45 Amicus Brief's(Friends of the Court) submitted.

The majority are obviously OPPOSED TO THE IDEA that the President but MOSTLY TRUMP, does not have immunity. See how that works.

We should call it "Amicus Brief War", prior to Civil or Revolutionary War

Case is SET FOR ARGUMENT ON April 25, 2024

Anon's you can find all the filings and documents of this case on:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-939.html

you can use this link below to look up any case via name, case # etc. There are and have been 22 cases with Trump involved.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx?Search=&type=Docket

All the documents submitted to the Supreme Court by Kari Lake & Finchem on the voting machines, and all the problems they foundUse link below to check up on Kari's case, very import. Curt Olsen is the lawyer and wrote everything.

No. 23-1021

Title: Kari Lake, et al., Petitioners

v.

Adrian Fontes, Arizona Secretary of State, et al.

Docketed: March 18, 2024

Linked with 23A622

Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Numbers: (22-16413)

Decision Date: October 16, 2023

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-1021.html

>>20707892

I thought 45 Amicus Brief's were a lot, I was wrong:

The SC case to settle if PDJT can be removed from the ballot by Coloradofor a fake Insurrection, that the left lost badly,THEY SUBMITTED 86, YES 86 Amicus Briefs submitted to the court, not all from the left but the super majority were the left.

Seriously "the left" thought they had a winning argument.

This case was"The Amicus Brief World War"

These people are insanely desperate! This is not TDS any longer it'sTDS requiring an Insane AsylumMaybe "TDSIA". thoughts anons?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-719.html

>>20708004

Ok this is how this actually went:

Garland and DOJ/FBI work with them,DOJ wanted to arrest more, but it will effect Bidan's re-electionwhen it gets out.

So Garland told Sedition Hunters, we'll compose a letterthat you can put on your letterhead to send to us== to arrest 1,000s and 1,000s more of citizen. In this scenario Garland and DOJ is just responding to a citizen's request. And they will do it quickly.

Trump and others have warned us, we are next on a large scale, this might be it?

I they do this and arrest a 100,000 or more, it's a great scare tactic to prevent people from voting, or others things.

They have been ready to go full NAZI MARXIST since they got there, since they are not winning so easily on Trump cases, they are just accelerating their time frame.

See how that works?

BTW guaranteed FBI/DOJ set up the group before J6 with, agents, operators, plants, etc in the group, that are on the payroll FBI and DOJ. The gov set up this group. Has anyone researched them thoroughly?

>>20708092

That is so freaking cool!!! Police SS etc. SS has doubled, tripled and quadrupled in the last two years.

>>20707801

This video is the final end of the FED, there is no question at this point, that they are destroying the country intentionally. This needs to accelerated at a rapid rate.

>https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1778157381907513802

>>20707803

If everything is classified why is he talking at a restaurant? Wouldn't that be treason, talking about the inside actions of FED

>>20707801

O'Keefe better get super spy protection, he's kicking more than a Bee Hive, this is the NWO he's exposing. How do these people get trapped so easily, (maybe not easily)?

>>20707768

YES, YES, YES!

>>20707768

>>20707768

House Republicans Join Democrats to Block FISA Re-Authorization Bill over Privacy Concerns

Story by James Lynch April 10, 2024

A group of House Republicans voted with Democrats on Wednesday afternoon to derail legislation designed to reauthorize the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and address longstanding concerns over mass surveillance.

Over a dozen Republican lawmakers joined with Democrats to tankthe Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act,a bill that would re-authorize FISA section 702 for five yearsand institute a series of reforms to mitigate perceived abuses by the intelligence community.

The vote comes after months of debate over two separate bipartisan FISA authorization proposals in the House Intelligence Committee and Judiciary Committee respectively. The bill proposed by the Judiciary Committee would have required a search warrant to conduct FISA searches on American citizens, a key difference between the two packages.

Three members of the House Freedom Caucus, Representatives Matt Gaetz (R., Fla.), Anna Paulina Luna (R., Fla.) and Tim Burchett (R., Tenn.) came out against the legislation earlier today, leading the Republican opposition. Additionally,former president Donald Trump spoke out against FISA re-authorization ahead of the procedural voteand claimed it was used to spy on his presidential campaign.

“KILL FISA, IT WAS ILLEGALLY USED AGAINST ME, AND MANY OTHERS. THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN!!!” Trump said on Truth Social this morning. He was likely referring to the FBI’s discredited Crossfire Hurricane investigation of Russian collusion claims based on the debunked Steele Dossier. Special counsel John Durham found the FISA authorization process was abused during the investigation in order to spy on formerTrump official Carter Page, despite the lack of evidence against him and factual errors on the FISA applications.

Acoalition of hardline conservatives and progressives have objected to the warrantless monitoringof American citizens made possible by loopholes in FISA section 702, a law crafted to enable intelligence officials to conduct warrantless surveillance on foreign threats.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R., La.) urged Republicans to get behind the FISA authorization bill despite his agreement with Trump on the intelligence community’s past FISA abuses. Johnson noted the Trump administration used FISA to help kill terrorists and touted the accountability measures in the legislative package. (this guy just betrayed Trump, what dirt do they have on him? It’s really got to be bad.) Johnson’s rift with the hard right on FISA authorization and military aid for Ukraine could add momentum to Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s (R., Ga.) challenge to his speakership after less than a year.

The intelligence community led by FBI director Christopher Wray has pushed for FISA re-authorization to ensure the ability of U.S. officials to thwart foreign threats. Wray argued last year the warrant requirement would be equivalent to a ban on searching Americans because of the bureaucratic delays created by the application process.

FISA authorization is set to expire on April 19 and it’s unclear if congress will be able to re-authorize the program in time. Republicans are reportedly meeting at 4.p.m eastern to discuss the situation.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-republicans-join-democrats-to-block-fisa-re-authorization-bill-over-privacy-concerns/ar-BB1lpxo2#

Picture:

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson listens during a press conference following a House GOP caucus meeting at the Capitol on April 10, 2024.

House blocks FISA reauthorization bill after Trump says ‘kill FISA’

The vote was 228 to 193 to block the ruleUpdated: April 10, 2024 2:53pm

The GOP-led House voted to block the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act reauthorization bill on the House floor Wednesday after it passed out of the Rules Committee on Tuesday.

The vote to block the rule providing for House floor consideration of the bill was 228 to 193. Thelatest vote reportedly marks the seventh time a rule that has failedon the House floorunder House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.

The "Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act" would have extended Section 702 of FISA for 5 years. A group of amendments to the bill including a warrant requirement had cleared the Rules Committee on Tuesday night.

Former President Trump had posted on Truth Social that the GOP should "kill FISA" shortly before the scheduled vote. Johnson reacted to Trump's post ahead of the vote.

"I look forward to talking with him about it. Here's the thing about FISA, he's not wrong, of course, they abused FISA," Johnson said, referring to the launch of the Russia collusion probe. "These reforms would actually kill the abuses that allowed President Trump's campaign to be spied on." (Johnson willingly lies all the time, so much for Biblical View. Trump shouldn't talk to him ever again)

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., applauded the 19 Republicans who voted to block the bill from advancing.

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/house-blocks-fisa-reauthorization-bill

Bill Barr blasts Trump for call to kill FISA: ‘Crazy and reckless’

(Barr STFU, no one trusts you anymore, you lie, and lie and lie again. Does he realize at least 100 million American's hate him intensely?)

Fear mongering just starting.

by Alexander Bolton - 04/10/24 5:09 PM ET

Former Attorney General Bill Barr on Wednesday denounced former President Trump’s exhortation for Congress to kill the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) as “crazy and reckless” and warned there will be “blood on people’s hands” if the intelligence community’s surveillance authority expires and there’s a terrorist attack on the United States. (FF already set up by IC agencies, Anon's spread the word, that's the warning)

Barr, who served in Trump’s Cabinet in 2019 and 2020, noted that Trump at one time supported the expanded surveillance powers authorized under Section 702 of FISA and warned that political “posturing” against extending that authority would be dangerous to national security.

“I think it’s crazy and reckless to not move forward with FISA. It’s our principal tool protecting us from terrorist attacks. We’re living through a time where those threats have never been higher, so it’s blinding us, it’s blinding our allies,” Barr told The Hill in an interview.

“I think President Trump’s opposition seems to have stemmed from personal pique rather than any logic and reason. The provision that he objects to has nothing to do with the provision that’s on the floor,” he said, referring to the legislation that would reauthorize Section 702 of FISA, which stalled in the House on Wednesday after 19 Republicans voted to defeat a rule to move it forward not long after Trump said it should be killed.

“KILL FISA, IT WAS ILLEGALLY USED AGAINST ME, AND MANY OTHERS. THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN!!!” Trump posted on Truth Social, his social media platform, shortly before the House GOP conference met to discuss the legislation.

Hours later, the House voted 193 to 228 to defeat the rule to advance the reauthorization of surveillance authority. The House vote leaves the future of legislation extending Section 702 of FISA, which expires on April 19, unclear.

Barr argued that Trump’s statement itself is incorrect, pointing out that the wiretap of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page during the 2016 election had no connection to Section 702. “The part of FISA that was abused during Russia-gate had to do with getting wiretaps for American citizens, and that’s not what’s being considered. This is our ability to exploit foreign communications, and there are no Fourth Amendment issues with respect to the collection of this information,” Barr said of the Section 702 surveillance authority.

“I believe this will result in attacks on the United States we’re not able to intercept,” he warned.Barr pointed out that Trump supported extending Section 702 authority while he was president but then later waffled on the issue.

“Initially, he was willing to have it reauthorized and told me to go ahead and get it reauthorized, and then he flip-flopped around about it depending on who the last person to talk to him was,” he recalled. “As he became angrier and angrier about the left’s attacks on him over Russia-gate, he became less willing to support reauthorization.

“I think that is improper because this is protecting the national security, and the objections he has to Section 1 don’t apply here. I feel there’s a lot of political posturing here. I don’t think when it comes to something this important in protecting the country there should be,” he said. Barr warned that allowing the intelligence community’s surveillance authority to expire could backfire in a major way on Republicans who block the reauthorization of FISA if there’s an attack on U.S. soil that could have been otherwise prevented.

“I hope for Republicans’ sake that there are no attacks, because if there are, I think there will be blood on people’s hands for doing this. It’s reckless,” he said.

And he said the future of intelligence agencies’ ability to surveil foreign threats could be significantly compromised if Trump is elected and continues to opposed Section 702 of FISA.Asked if future surveillance authority would be jeopardized if Trump returns to the White House, Barr said: “Who knows? It would seem that way.” (Not so veiled threats)

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4586620-bill-barr-blasts-trump-for-call-to-kill-fisa-crazy-and-reckless/