Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 7:49 p.m. No.20709527   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20709278

Has Ben is such a fucking bad ass when he talks like this. I remember when he single-handedly took out a gorillion HAMAS fighters with, using only his wits, his kippah, 3 matzo balls and a broken bottle of Manischewitz he used as a makeshift knife. Kek. It was so real in his mind.

Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 7:54 p.m. No.20709560   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9572

>>20709541

Muh "Muslims" (tm). Christianity and Islam are branches off of Judaism. You're all the same religious ideology (tm). Kek. Also isn't it Jewish organizations who are pushing for mass migration and open boders? Just making observations.

Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 8:17 p.m. No.20709677   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9683 >>9694 >>9782

>>20709528

The hubris of the Tribe (tm) is absolutely fascinating. Every response from Loomer is pure projection, but somehow she manages to make herself the victim, as though she were personally being "attacked" (tm) by Iran and Palestinians. Each poast is pure accusatorial projection at all Americans, as she opines on Tucker's interview, yet rather than admitting the fact that thereISJewish discrimination towards Christians in Israel, she slides immediately into a whataboutism about Muslims treatment of Christians. Even when this Andrew cat brings up "America First," Loomer deflects the shot, implying she alone defines what "America First" is, by going so far as to blood libel Palestinians with the (alleged) "DEATH TO AMERICA" (tm) narrative. Then, she falls back to muh "Shoah" (tm) on Oct 7th to hammer in her narrative, as though she felt her mere invocation of it would silence any and all opposition to her comments. Their self-deluded notion of "Chosen One" (tm) status really does make thembelievethey should be deified by all non-Jews. The concept that not everyone believes what they do eludes them.

 

Watching these people completely collapse as they do everything in their power to stop what is coming, is a remarkable experience. They're completely oblivious to anything that isn't about them. Incredible.

Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 8:29 p.m. No.20709723   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9732

>>20709709

>the fact that you think you can needle me doesn't make your use of '(tm)' any less annoying. It makes what you say seem like your being childish and vain.

Kek. That's projection. Next time, don't whine about something beyond your control. Simple as.

>so go ahead, criticize me and ignore my advice

Moar projection. I didn't criticize you in the slightest - in fact, I corrected your grammatical mistake - and you didn't give me any advice. You whined about something you didn't like.

> it doesn't bother me at all.

Apparently, it does.

Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 8:43 p.m. No.20709789   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9902 >>9959

>>20709732

>grammar and spelling aren't the same, anon.

Grammar is a set of rules used for a writer's creation of sentences and written structure. Your sentence was grammatically incorrect.

>you ought to consider your own use of words, too.

Kek. You'reBIG MAD.

>no, anon, you don't bother me.

Apparently, I do. Enough to tell me that you find my poasts "annoying" (tm). But tell me again how I'm not bothering you? eye roll

>I was tyring to give you some friendly advice.

Kek. No, you weren't. You made it quite clear I was "being annoying" (tm) to you. Now, you could have been the bigger person and not said anything. Sure it's "annoying" (tm), but that's just you, right? I mean, it's not like I'm slaughtering civvies by the thousands, right? You made a comment, 'cos youchoseto. That's your right. But the outcome you wanted didn't happen, as I didn't acquiesce to your demand.

>but you have to a pissy jerk, because that's what you do, right?

Kek. Grab your minerals and man up, Anon. Reddit breeds weakness.

Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 9:04 p.m. No.20709865   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9897

>>20709820

Soโ€ฆ.. was this a hit and run? Guy had his CCL and FOID, so he was in the clear on that. Obviously ex-military or ex-law enforcement. If he hit the car and fled, that should be a felony. Something tells me someone pulled some strings to get him off on a lesser charge. If there was actually no accident, the cameraman could be seen as the "aggressor" (tm) in court. Why would he get out of his car to film this guy. The video itself, would be inconclusive.

Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 9:07 p.m. No.20709876   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20709855

>Kek. There are Jews and there are Goyim.

Kek. The "White" Jews appear to not like the "Non-White" Jews. You'd think they'd have learned after Hitler, instead the "White" Ones act just like him. That's Nazi shit. Kek.

Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 9:20 p.m. No.20709945   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9956 >>9970

>>20709854

>Didn't Trump sign an EO saying Jews are a different species?

>I might be paraphrasing.

Indeed he did. EOs only apply to Federal Agencies, though. It does cause some problems, however. SCOTUS already said that "Jews" are a "sub-group" (tm) of Caucasoid. Jews kinda screwed themselves there. See, a Synagogue got vandalized a few decades ago and when they caught the vandals, the vandals were charged with a hate crime and sentenced. However, because it was a "religious hate crime" (tm), the Jews of the Synagogue had to pay to repair all the damages. That didn't bode well for the Synagogue, so theyappealedtheir own ruling to sue for damages, saying they were attacked based off "race" and not "religion" . Well, that set a fire and one of the lawyers for the vandals, called for a dismissal, as her client claimed it had nothing to with "race" as they thought "Jews were white." So, the Synagogue appealed and was ruled against. That didn't satisfy them, though so they appealed again, losing yet again. This synagogue went through each circuit, finally making it's way to SCOTUS, who gave them a pyrrhic victory: They shot down their appeal, but did define that since "some Jews identified as White," Jews should be classified as a "Sub-group" of Caucasoid. The opinions of the court are absolutely hilarious. In the end, the Synagogue spent more money on appeals, losing every time and getting branded as "White" by the Supreme court in the process, than it would have for them to have just paid to repaint the synagogue.

 

https://casetext.com/case/shaare-tefila-congregation-v-cobb

 

https://casetext.com/case/shaare-tefila-congregation-v-cobb-2

Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 9:34 p.m. No.20710010   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0023

>>20709959

>your projecting again.

You're.

>you messed up the meaning of the words you used meanwhile accusing me of 'grammar errors when it was a simple spelling mistake.

No, Anon. I'm the one that knows the difference between "lose" and "loose." Take the L.

>get some sleep anon, you're obviously warn out and you've got no one to badger who will have 'feelz' because of you're mean-bitch persona.

*Worn Wow. You really got butt-hurt. Fill out this form and get back to me.

>seriously I liked that you were bold and unfiltered in what you had written, I just think that the constant use of (tm) is sophmoric and unnecessary.

Sophomoric. sighs* This is 8Kun, Anon. Nobody gives a fuck what you think. If you like what I have to say, then read it. If it "annoys" you, don't. I don't care either way. My use of Trademark, is in mocking derision at (((those))) who believe they're "superior" (tm) to all others 'cos their "invisible Deity" (tm) says (allegedly) told them they are. It doesn't matter whatyoufeel is unnecessary, as I'm not you, nor am I beholden to your beliefs. You made your opinion known, I took the piss out of you for it and now you're incessantly whining about it. Grow. The. Fuck. Up.

>if you need to think of me as an enemy, I hope you can get past it.

That's your projection, not mine. You're nothing to me. Just another Anon I spoke to, in passing.

>but you had to take it as an attack, so sad.

Kek. You really have a high opinion of yourself, don't ya?

Anonymous ID: 92384b April 10, 2024, 9:38 p.m. No.20710035   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20709970

Yeahโ€ฆ. when I had to read these case files 2 decades ago, I couldn't help but laugh about it. I never did find out the amount they spent, but I dug up articles on it and the damage was a couple of hundred in paint and not the tens of thousands they probably spent in appellate courts.