Anonymous ID: 949ed9 April 11, 2024, 7:53 a.m. No.20711459   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20711443

The funny thing is, you can tell that when the time comes he won't be a man and face justice for his malevolent actions, he'll kill himself. Of that I have no doubt.

Anonymous ID: 949ed9 April 11, 2024, 7:59 a.m. No.20711491   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1523

>>20711479

>Why are we titling the breds anyways?

Because that's the way it's done here. Not every bread has been named over the years. There have been a few instances where it was just the bread number though in the past six years that I can remember.

Anonymous ID: 949ed9 April 11, 2024, 9:44 a.m. No.20711999   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Because when it comes to those phone screenshots it went from "Just making sure nothing is missed" a few days ago when questioned about it, to "Making sure new eyes see it" last night. It's all about manipulating newfags.

Anonymous ID: 949ed9 April 11, 2024, 9:51 a.m. No.20712024   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2037

>>20712006

I've been trying to reconcile that post with the blinkies I see zipping around and hovering in the skies at night with increasing frequency as time goes on. Perhaps others not under Q's compartmentalization are taking initiative? Who knows? The appearance, and pushing all day of phone screenshots of MIL tweets, tying other countries' (Canada, Australia, South Korea, etc.) to Q timestamps and drop numbers is awfully suspicious. Reeks of when the Absolute Retards tried creating fake Q proofs in 2021. The US MIL tweets not so much though because a lot of them seem to actually align.

Anonymous ID: 949ed9 April 11, 2024, 9:57 a.m. No.20712054   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2060 >>2075

>>20712037

>>20712037

> When you start to break that rule you open up many sources and claims to be Q comms and that is not appropriate.

Do you deny Dan and POTUS Trump using comms that are "outside of this board?" I get what you're saying, and I understand the judgemental dilemma that this subject creates. It's a discernment thing. If it feels fake, seems fake, it probably is; that's just your instinct talking. I suspect the clowns are mixing in noise to create confusion.

Anonymous ID: 949ed9 April 11, 2024, 10:01 a.m. No.20712085   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2093 >>2104

>>20712075

> but there really is no support or or justification for making that leap to ANY military Twat,

Some do add up. Not from other countries though.

>Dan and Potus Trump are tied to Q and it is very appropriate to make Q post associations

And the US military isn't tied to Q?

Anonymous ID: 949ed9 April 11, 2024, 10:11 a.m. No.20712131   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20712111

> but only Q can lay claim to a Q comm

So why are you laying claim to what comms are acceptable? You're the one claiming they're a false Q comm. I'm saying that they're comms but not necessarily from Q. Look, I find the MIL tweet push tying them to Q posts suspicious too, based upon the words from the poster about wanting to make sure that new eyes see them, but some do line up with the drops. I just think of it as a branch of clockfagging; some of it line up, some of it doesn't.