US NAVY Comms point to Epstein
NOT NOTABLE
this is a shill narrative attempt to seperate Q from this board.
Unless you are a shill baker you should be able to comprehend plain english from this Q post.
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.4 📁
Jan 8 2018 23:29:38 (EST)
IMPORTANT:
NO private comms past/present/future.
NO comms made outside of this platform.
Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.
PATRIOTS.
Q
shill baker promotes/notables random mil twats with Q posts. Fake news not supported by Q.
shill baker promotes/notables random mil twats with Q posts. Fake news not supported by Q.
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.4 📁
Jan 8 2018 23:29:38 (EST)
IMPORTANT:
NO private comms past/present/future.
NO comms made outside of this platform.
Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.
PATRIOTS.
Q
Perhaps you could enlighten the entire board by pointing to the exception in the Q post below that Q made about random mil twats being valid comms?
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.4 📁
Jan 8 2018 23:29:38 (EST)
IMPORTANT:
NO private comms past/present/future.
NO comms made outside of this platform.
Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.
PATRIOTS.
Q
really?? what would that be other than a shill attempt to distract and divert attention from this board regarding Q.
that is all you got? You can't even understand or rebut an obvious Q post regarding his comms. KYS.
until you deal with this Q post, you have NO argument.
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.4 📁
Jan 8 2018 23:29:38 (EST)
IMPORTANT:
NO private comms past/present/future.
NO comms made outside of this platform.
Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.
PATRIOTS.
Q
However, no connection to these twats and Q can be directly correlated simply for the fact he stated no comms outside this board. When you start to break that rule you open up many sources and claims to be Q comms and that is not appropriate. It only serves to dilute and discredit. It needs to be called out for what it is by anons.
Dan and Potus Trump are tied to Q and it is very appropriate to make Q post associations but there really is no support or or justification for making that leap to ANY military Twat, and that includes foreign mil TWATs this same anon has pushed.
>Some do add up.
maybe…. but how does make it a product or comm of Q? Not sufficient enough to make that leap.
>>And the US military isn't tied to Q?
how does this support Q sending secret comms through Twats when he specifically said that is untrue?
anyone can make comms but only Q can lay claim to a Q comm and he left us with pretty clear information about where we would hear from him and know it was him.
There is already legitimate discussion about the validity of the most recent Q posts on this board. Why all of a sudden to we take at face value that Q is talking through mil twats? This is lazy and more representative of creating a narrative.