So tired of money being the "solution" to piece of shit cops. They break the law, we the people pay.
That question is not up to the federal government. They do not have that authority. It's up to each state individually.
Powers not enumerated to the federal government by the constitution are reserved to the states or people respectively.
Where does the constitution claim to protect the unborn? Where does the constitution grant the federal government the authority to decide it does?
You're trying to claim the federal government has to decide if it has the authority to do what it doesn't have the authority to do. Just like with weed. The federal government does not have the authority to prohibit citizens from using weed, that's why when the states legalized it the feds didn't do anything, they CAN'T. They also CAN'T do what you claim they should do, they do not have that authority.
Jesus said oaths are of the evil one. An oath is a false sense of security. While the oath means something to you, to those taking it it may mean nothing, or they have as Q puts it, "A higher loyalty".
In case you haven't figured this out, the people who have fucked up the country swore an oath too.
The point is, the feds don't have the authority to decide that. The states do. No, the feds do not have total authority, you clearly don't understand how our government was designed to function and believe the nonsense you've seen in media.
You know the declaration of independence means absolutely nothing to the constitution right.
The declaration of independence also tells you government is granted authority by consent of the governed. What happens when you don't consent to paying taxes?
No they don't kek. Seek reality.
You do understand the federal government is not the final authority right? We the People can overturn the government at any point, just like jury nullification. If the state says yes, the feds say no, and the people say yes, the feds are fucked.
Like Q said, power belongs with the people.
The federal government does not have the authority you think they do. Apparently you're as afraid of the people waking up and remembering that as they are. kek
Sorry to burst your bubble, I'm a conservative. I'm an actual conservative though and believe in the rule of law and limiting federal government, not the RINO bullshit.
No you just want someone to swear an oath to make you feel better while they serve a "higher loyalty".
I believe EVERY state should outlaw abortion, but it's just that, it's up to the STATES. The federal government does not have the authority, no matter how much you want to argue they do. That's why roe was overturned.
How do you define a citizen of the United States?
I agree with you it's a ridiculous double standard to allow abortion but charge someone with murder if they kill the baby in attacking the woman. I'm against abortion, but I'm ALSO against the federal government exercising authority they do not have. I'm also against them setting shit like this up to get people to argue for them to do so.
When did I say I'm concerned with a single religion? The fact is many in government who swore the oath serve a higher oath.
They're not restrained by an oath, as Q told you… "A higher loyalty". YOU want people to believe the oath restrains them.
You're confusing "person" with "citizen". The constitution forbids states from making laws depriving CITIZENS of rights. So if the government says a baby has rights under the constitution t, they would have to declare an unborn baby a citizen.
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."
I wouldn't join the military because I wont sell myself like a prostitute. I will not swear an oath so I will never seek being "sworn" into anything. I'm not a mason or vatican shill.
I'll say whatever I want.
That's what I asked you. How do you define a citizen?
You say the feds have the right not the states, but the law disagrees with you. You're arguing for MORE federal control rather than less, because feelings.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.
Feds don't have NEARLY the authority they've tried to exercise and many believe they have.
The federal government is governed and restricted by the constitution. Any power not granted to the federal government in the constitution is reserved to the states or the people respectively.
Again…
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities ofcitizensof the United States.
That's already well defined.
Do you understand the constitution LIMITS federal government and what they have the power to do? You keep thinking the feds are the top authority, they're not. WE THE PEOPLE are.
You can't honestly be this ignorant.
All personsbornor naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
I didn't say that did I? You're arguing feelings while not understanding law and insisting I'm ignorant for understanding the difference.
No I didn't, you're trying a strawman again.
I didn't say no state has the right to ban abortion. I said it's states rights and the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT doesn't have authority over the states on abortion.
You REALLY need to work on your reading comprehension.
Pure nonsense. Notice you're now arguing for the woman. It's not about Truth for you, just the argument.
That's up to the STATES to decide.
You're arguing for federal authority the feds do not have, while denying the states authority, then lying and projecting the denial of the states authority onto me.
No, you clearly do not.
So, if the Supreme Court today decided that white people are 2/3rds of a person, that's it, the states have no say?
Who does the constitution limit?
Notice you're still arguing for the right of the woman to have an abortion, while you were arguing the opposite earlier.
So much nonsense from you. Like I said, not about the Truth, only the argument.
You make so many nonsense assumtions, you clearly don't know the constitution, and claim yourself to have "destroyed" truth. kek.
Where does the constitution say you have a right to an abortion that the state can't ban?
I agree it's a ridiculous double standard, but it's up to the states. The federal government doesn't have the authority.
Why the partial quote? He said there is none good but God.
He also said we're One with God.
I said when ALL you can do is name call, not "because" you name call. The fact is you have no argument kek.
>terms are defined as to what a citizen is
It already is clearly defined. The 14th amendment clearly defines it. The same amendment that says the states can't deny a right or privilege of a citizen.
Your error is believing the constitution says a citizen has a right to an abortion.
It's a state issue.
When you deny the least of these, you deny Him. Make sure you don't reject Him because He doesn't meet YOUR expectations.
Where does the constitution define a person as unborn, and where does the constitution grant the federal government the power to do so?
It sounds like you need a new amendment, which is up to the STATES.
To interpret and determine if it's constitutional, NOT to define. Only the states have the power to modify the constitution with 3/4 approval.
Let's say the court says white people are 2/3rds of a person, the STATES can immediate overturn it.
Ultimately though, the power belongs to We the People. THEY answer to US.