that bill would violate the first amendment.
whats libertarian about the idea that by putting this bill forward it is a violation of the first amendment.
wasnt there a time when chess fags had images of this play many years ago now. Do you remember if any pawns were able to make it to the other side and create a new piece.
that is a total bunch of nonsensical crap that does not matter to the constitution and the ability to practice religion even if it offends someone.
thanks might have to dig into this because if there is an added queen, then there is a piece that is not on the board at this time or has not been created. If you just look at the symbolic nature of it.
Why do anons think it is the marshal attack that should be looked at? Its been a long time since I even thought about this, and if there was an answer I do not recall.
Marshall also appears to have maybe castled his king at some point in that game. I see the question is about what side is he saying he was. By move 25 I think which was QF3, white really has total domination of the board.