Anonymous ID: 010512 July 7, 2018, 1:01 p.m. No.2072581   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2592

>>2072544

>article shill

 

lullllzzzzzzz

 

hahaha… yeah man, the article that promotes Q. You guys are cracking me up right now. Hilarious.

 

>>2072501

>>2072549

These anons get it. Ever since discussion of the forbidden article has came up, the shills have been hitting us with everything they got. Lotta projecting, tons of gay and midget porn, and all the other etc.

 

They know this article lends credence to our movement. (((they))) are scared.

Anonymous ID: 010512 July 7, 2018, 1:02 p.m. No.2072594   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2650

>>2072573

>Refers to like a dozen anons as "her"

 

STFU dumbass… your disinfo is of snopes quality. No wonder you prefer we stick to having normies read what washing post or newsweek says about Q

 

Ur glow stinks of cum and blood. Disgusting.

Anonymous ID: 010512 July 7, 2018, 1:06 p.m. No.2072639   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2651 >>2661

>>2072592

Have you ever heard of search function? Go back through last couple breads and search the ids of those posting pro article and anti-article and you can clearly see who the fucking shills are.

 

This isn't rocket science. We have all the tools we need. That article snaps normies into action and gives them something they can be proud of being part of…. WE ARE Q… WE control the message, no matter how bad some of you feeble minded anons are at determining who the shills are and what is being slid away from.

Anonymous ID: 010512 July 7, 2018, 1:14 p.m. No.2072710   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2072584

Fuck you. There were a half a dozen of us trying to talk about it but we were shilled by fags like you that for whatever reason, couldn't just filter us???

 

Like a shill tactic to IP Hop and post a buncha times asking questions about a seemingly overall positive article regarding Q movement was published…. cool story. You should sell used cars in Omaha. You would be great on a used car lot.

Anonymous ID: 010512 July 7, 2018, 1:17 p.m. No.2072749   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2920

>>2072697

Exactly!

 

Occam's Razor.

 

Between yesterday's catalog attack and today's, we've had insurmountable shilling of the absolute worst kind… including the lethal gay pelican porn tactic… now what has directly coincided with that entire timeframe?

 

It's like all the Q is larp and "I'm giving up" larps left and came back as the "abolish the article" and "the article is grotesque" shills while having their minions post midget and gay porn as well…

 

Nothing is a coincidence. Connect dots much?

Anonymous ID: 010512 July 7, 2018, 1:21 p.m. No.2072780   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2072587

So filter and move on… quit announcing to the anons your intentions on degrading the first ever pro Q article we've had in the history of the movement… that's the shit that only (((they))) would do.

Anonymous ID: 010512 July 7, 2018, 1:42 p.m. No.2072970   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2072876

Yep and that article was the only one to mention the tippy top proof…. and they published the ben garrison cartoon… no hit piece would have done that.

 

I seriously can't figure out why anons are being peruaded by loud shills to overlook this article? It's really powerful. Just send it around to a couple normies and find out quickly.

Anonymous ID: 010512 July 7, 2018, 1:46 p.m. No.2073004   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3034

>>2072827

What in that article was made u mumbo jumbo? Example pleaes?

 

What, you gonna say Q didn't mean We Are All Q when he said WE ARE ALL Q???

 

TRY HARDER YOU PELICAN FAGGOT.

Anonymous ID: 010512 July 7, 2018, 2 p.m. No.2073115   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3142 >>3144 >>3158

>>2073047

Plausible deniability you dumb fuck. We can't doxx Q… If WE ARE ALL Q, just like Q told us too, then it's impossible to doxx Q

 

For nat'l security issues… c'mon anons… do you really need this shit spelled out for you?