>>2072290

>>2072283

no. for some reason, BO and CM never gave us an explanation.

>>2072345

it's incredibly sketchy..

BO has been weird lately..

>>2072394

the truth can stand on it's own merit, absolutely

but the truth can easily be covered up

stop spreading complacency and inaction

we are doing as Q says and BEING HEARD

FIGHTING

anons, the catalogue is broken for the second time and we haven't gotten a single explanation as to what is happening. it was shillcon 1 on a night shift when it's usually quiet. filled with gay porn. all because of this article.

what is happening?

why is it happening?

does this make any sense?

what happened to honor and integrity?

free speech vs. censorship

critical free thinking vs. appeals to authority

what is happening with this board?

>>2072440

think logically, anon.

think critically.

who else is here?

(((they))) are here.

i would love for a journalist to come on here, but this is the best we've got right now and attacking it is antagonistic to the cause.

beggers can't be choosers.

>>2072467

thank you. i shine brightly everywhere i go, anonymous or nor. i am of the light. god bless you.

>>2072484

i agree, never settle for less.

this is an excellent article.

>>2072419

nothing fake or gay about it.

and you're right, it does more bad than good for the cabal who don't want anyone reading it.

>>2072422

i'll pray for you, and for us all

may truth come to light.

>>2072530

Q himself said "we are Q"

if you have a problem with me saying it, take it up with Q

the power lies with us, we the people.

that is why Q needs us to spread the truth.

without us, without you the people, this operation will fail. wake up. we are not sheep. we are powerful.

>>2072418

that is what is currently happening.

anons are being divided over this article.

the catalogue is broken for the second time.

no explanation from BO or CM.

Q is quiet.

we are being tested.

>>2072432

>>2072432

>>2072432

>>2072432

>>2072593

"we shouldn't even bother trying to prove Q to people"

what the fuck man.

lurkers, ask yourselves why this is happening.

help the anons defending this article.

>>2072617

disinformation is real.

disinformation is necessary.

>>2072605

this independent journalist made us look like the brave revolutionaries that we are.

every other journalist has made us look like neo-nazis, "the great unwashed", conspiracy theorists etc etc.

pay attention, anons.

hold the line.

>>2072666

the new tactic is to claim that one independent journalist is dismantling the movement by writing an article in support of the movement.

pay attention, anons.

why is this happening?

>>2072676

we must not be talking about the same thing. idk who this Lee person is. i'm talking about the big league article that's bringing all the porn and shills to the board and breaking the catalogue for the second time with no explanation from BO and CM.

>>2072698

i've been on this planet for 13 billion years and your old vs. young division tactics don't work on me.

wwg1wga, bitch.

>>2072719

THIS SCREENSHOT IS NOT FROM THE SAME ARTICLE

PAY ATTENTION ANONS

ANOTHER TACTIC: USING SCREENSHOTS FROM OTHER ARTICLES TO DISTRACT FROM AND DISCREDIT THE BIG LEAGUE ONE.

>>2072727

well fuck. we are being attacked on all sides. fucking shit. thank you for bringing this to my attention.

>>2072731

ah i understand.

i've been defending this article nonstop. see if i were a shill i would attack you for this. but this is actually a legitimate criticism of the article - which i've been asking for anons to counter with instead of ad hominem attacks. i am grateful you brought it to my attention. i suggested we dig on the writer and BLP but i hadn't gotten a chance myself.

the only thing i will add is that article was written in march 2017 before Q was around. idk if it discredits the who is q article but it does call it into question. thanks again.

>>2072807

there was an increase. i did not say they were new. i said they came out in droves during a night shift. which is unusual.

i also didn't say the issues with the catalog have anything to with BO. only that we weren't provided with an explanation. i think critically and have no reason to believe some fuckery isn't afoot. i love you, anon. wwg1wga.

i'm done talking about the big league article

1. the writer used to be a fan of alex jones - questionable

1. the lee stranahan thing is worrisome and i think more important to focus on right now. we are being attacked on all sides.

wwg1wga. going back to the real world.

>>2072899

idfk

i just scrolled on his twitter and it looks bad but i'm probably wrong. i'm tired. if it's not a big deal then fuck that guy but i can't be on here for 3 more hours defending Q against shills. i'm tired.

>>2072910

oh i didn't consider it may be related to him/her. so fucking annoying

>>2072891

i don't really care that i revealed an ID from last night.. it's obvious i'm the same person to anyone who has some semblance of intelligence.

nah i'm not shaking. kinda tired from battling shills, but i'm good.

have a great day!

anons, doubt anyone cares but just wanted to put this here for the record

i don't wanna dox myself but 4 people so far have revealed a fact about me on this board in this bread. idk how they know. i am one of 2-4 people defending the big league article and the fact that this is happening and they were able to somehow figure this out about me is mildly scary. i haven't addressed them. but this shit is getting too real.

i love you all, good luck

>>2073030

outed yourself, bitch.

can't wait til you and every other criminal on this board is arrested.