>>20726034

i was a liberal / progressive.

most (majority of everybody - but more right-wing people caught on, TeaParty etc.) in the Liberal camp they couldn't see the attack for what it was, since they felt USA deserved it. It fulfilled their expectations.

That clouded their reasoning?

dunno.

But i'd already studied about the corruption of USA - so… no disillusionment.

Thinking for many who have, or had, an illusion about USA, they can't let go of the idealized perception?, and that keeps them from seeing the crime(s)?

I could be completely wrong; there could be other reasons.

I was amazed, and still am, that so few people caught on.

But then that quality of the public - to be ignorant - re-expressed with even worse stupidity over the Eugenics program.

I'm just amazed people can't see it.

>>20726118

honor is real.

for something like honor to be fake

(there has to be something real to be falsified / mocked/ inverted.)

>>20726418 pb

>>20724266 pb

^ THIS

>>20726495

>>20726530

maybe always as a guy?

or maybe that's a twin?

>>20726533

nah / real satanist.

was reading interview with director ferrelly.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/peter-farrelly-breaks-down-15-141500876.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

(brother Bob was one of the "cancelled at the last minute 9/11 alleged attack plane flights)

he says om order to have a character do shitty things and "get away with it" in the perception of the audience, the character has to be likable. So he sets up the likable-ness before he has them do the shitty moves.

That's probably what's done with Obama / HRC .. all them. They are made to appear personally likable. I know that was done with W. Bush.

>>20726441

We're supposed to think they are compassionate, with artistic sensibilities

https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/tucker-carlson-interviews-dr-naomi?

"Tucker Carlson Interviews Dr. Naomi Wolf

Renowned author recognizes what most prominent liberals are unable to see. "

>>20726095

"what I found most intriguing was Carlson’s question about why Dr. Wolf was virtually alone among prominent liberal democrats in recognizing the pandemic response for what it was—that is, one of the most illiberal set of policies ever inflicted on the American people.

The question reminded me of the last line of Moby Dick, in which the narrator, Ishmael—the sole survivor of the destruction of the whaling ship Pequod—says, “And I only am escaped alone to tell thee.”

>>20726652

'Cept Trump failed to collude.

kek

Damn. spoiled their plot

fascinating - too! this board is the only place "eccentrics" such as myself and those like me, can post / speak / share.

tuckers interview of naomi wolf on YT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlYYvMB1mlM

>>20726670

>>20726668

>>20726664

Aren't Judges supposed to be even-handed; without prejudice? And by law, even avoid theAPPEARANCEof bias.

Actual bias is irrelevant for being named unfit to try a case; theappearanceof bias alone will render the person tainted.

Why. because the power of the Judiciary rests upon the appearance of righteousness. If there's a doubt, only, the case will taint the reputation of the Judiciary.

>>20726663

fb1 is off of charts.

Remember it was Mueller who was in charge of the 9/11 "investigation" which never happened. Investigation was taken over by citizens - same with JFK murder

"Debunking those Crazy Conspiracy Theorists"

>>20726670

>>20726668

>>20726664

Aren't Judges supposed to be even-handed; without prejudice? And by law, even avoid theAPPEARANCEof bias.

Actual bias is irrelevant for being named unfit to try a case; theappearanceof bias alone will render the person tainted.

Why. because the power of the Judiciary rests upon the appearance of righteousness. If there's a doubt, only, the case will taint the reputation of the Judiciary.

>>20726663

fb1 is off of charts.

Remember it was Mueller who was in charge of the 9/11 "investigation" which never happened. Investigation was taken over by citizens - same with JFK murder

"Debunking those Crazy Conspiracy Theorists"