Anonymous ID: 3995e5 April 15, 2024, 9:38 a.m. No.20728253   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8278

>>20728242

it no longer matters if decent people exist in the system, that is just a deflection to have hope. The very nature of the system requires that people trust it to be fair and unbiased. So no matter who it is now the perception of inequality especially in the law will exist. There is no solution to this either. The laws that people hold to be true are nothing more than the dictates of the corrupted that they place on to the system.

Anonymous ID: 3995e5 April 15, 2024, 9:46 a.m. No.20728286   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8350

>>20728278

its not impossible but until people start actually thinking and putting these garbage ideas behind us including that of religion, the bullshit will continue. The solutions will require creativity and compassion and not just a knee jerk reaction to the problem because that just sets people off into the try to over correct the problem.

Anonymous ID: 3995e5 April 15, 2024, 10:53 a.m. No.20728582   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8601 >>8605

>>20728545

yup and when they can change the law from one day to the next and when there is no balance either it makes no sense. I am not even sure reverting to a common law system works. At what point is there just going to need to be an amnesty on all crimes. Because at this point people currently incarcerted or being penalized in some form should have no trust in their verdicts were delivered fairly. Courts will be facing a major problem soon enough. Maybe this leads to the jubilee concept. I agree there is a big difference about the knowingly vs ignorance. Judges Knowingly violate the constitution. Its all a crock of shit.

Anonymous ID: 3995e5 April 15, 2024, 11:23 a.m. No.20728682   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20728661

every person who votes should be able to participate in a class action lawsuit against the state of their residence and also the federal government as this point.

Anonymous ID: 3995e5 April 15, 2024, 11:28 a.m. No.20728701   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8710

>>20728694

jury of your peers is a stupid concept. Like you said who is Trumps peer? Who is your peer? Can the average idiot understand a court case when most just want to get home at the end of the day and not deal with it. The entire system is broken top to bottom. There is no such thing as an unbiased trial.

Anonymous ID: 3995e5 April 15, 2024, 11:35 a.m. No.20728733   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8744

>>20728710

IQ and reading tests I think should be brought back not just to vote but perhaps also for jury duty. During muh civil rights movement it was declared illegal for people to administer such tests, BUT I think that was a huge mistake. When people are randomly selected and even in court the lawyers can petition to have jurors removed and not essentially stacking the pool with people who would be in favor or agianst depending. The concepts of citizenship need to be reevaluated. Starship troopers model, of service perhaps. Multiple ways of doing that. Back when you are talking about when the intent was, the communities were much smaller and people knew their neighbors or at least knew someone who knew someone. It is almost too large to handle at this scale currently.

Anonymous ID: 3995e5 April 15, 2024, 11:42 a.m. No.20728766   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8783

>>20728744

exactly. The average IQ is about 100 give or take on average, and then when you include race and sex it goes lower. White women for example score pretty average but they are just the full of themselves karen midwits. It is just a cluster fuck that no one wants to really address because sadly there are very complicated areas of this, and sadly that is also reality. So how does Trump get a Jury of his peers, will the jury be able to understand reasoning and logic of someone who plays "5D chess" when they can barely play checkers? NO.