NEW YORK STANDS WITH TRUMP!!!❤️🇺🇸
This is beautiful
0:55 25 minutes ago
https://rumble.com/embed/v4n0vlo/?pub=4
video on Current Mood
0:32
https://rumble.com/embed/v4n0lkl/?pub=4
YOU WEAK POS!!! #FJB
Reporter to Bidan: What would you say to Iran? You gotta admit this is funny
0:14
https://rumble.com/embed/v4mqd5h/?pub=4
Anons, please check this out for me. I'm on my computer and trying to cut and paste title to video with an American Flag from il Trumpo's videos to a Word doc, NONE of the FLAGS will paste on windows 365 Word doc==, at least for this rumble site. Then I tried to download flags from Windows online pictures, and for some reason they all failed to download. All other emojis on il Trumpo's videos can be cut and pasted
Please see if this happens with you. Try to copy this below, to a Word document on your computer
THEY ONLY RESPECTED THE REAL PRESIDENT!!!🇺🇸
This is what it looks like when posted to Word doc
THEY ONLY RESPECTED THE REAL PRESIDENT!!!US
But when I copy it from Word with the US on the end, and post it online the flag miraculously shows up
Bannon Connects Lincoln's Assasination To The Present Day Political Assassination of Trump
9:10
https://rumble.com/embed/v4n1guo/?pub=4
The MSM is drooling on PDJT in the court house. They are so fucking sick.
Mike Davis: NY Democrat Judges' Kids Are Profiting Off The Banana Republic Charges Against Trump. We've crossed the Rubicon. Nothing screams democracy like a trial in hellhole countries against political opposition (kek)
14:55
https://rumble.com/embed/v4n1ja6/?pub=4
April 15, 2024
The Trump Trial in Manhattan is an Indictment of the New York Legal System 1/2
Below is my column in the New York Post on the start of the Trump trial today in New York. I have long been critical of thecase as a clear example of the weaponization of the criminal justice system. No one seriously believes that Alvin Bragg would have spent this time and money to prosecute what is ordinarily a state misdemeanor if the defendant was anyone other than Trump. One does not have to like Trump to repel from the spectacle about to unfold in Manhattan.
Here is the column:
The famous Roman philosopher and oratorMarcus Tullius Cicero once said, “The more laws, the less justice.” This week, New York judges and lawyers appear eager to prove that the same is true for cases against Donald Trump.
After an absurd $450 million decision courtesy of Attorney General Letitia James, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg will bring his equally controversial criminal prosecution over hush money paid to former porn star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.
Lawyers have been scouring the civil and criminal codes for any basis to sue or prosecute Trumpbefore the upcoming 2024 election. This week will highlight the damage done to New York’s legal system because of this unhinged crusade. They’ve charged him with everything short of ripping a label off a mattress.
Just a few weeks ago, another judge imposed a roughly half billion dollar penalty in a case without a single victim who lost a single cent on loans with Trump. (Indeed, bank officials testified they wanted more business with the Trump organization).
Now Bragg is bringing a case that has taken years to develop andmillions of dollars in litigation costs for all parties. That is all over a crime from before the 2016 election that is a misdemeanor under state law that had already expired under the statute of limitations. Like his predecessor, Bragg previously scoffed at the case. However, two prosecutors, Carey R. Dunne and Mark F. Pomerantz, then resigned and started a public pressure campaign to get New Yorkers to demand prosecution.
Pomerantz shocked many of us by publishing a book on the case against Trump — who was still under investigation and not charged, let alone convicted, of any crime. He did so despite objections from his former colleague that such a book was grossly improper.
Nevertheless, it worked.Bragg brought a Rube Goldberg case that is so convoluted and counterintuitive that even liberal legal analysts criticized it.
Trump paid Daniels to avoid any publicity over their brief alleged affair. As a celebrity, there was ample reason to want to keep the affair quiet, and that does not even include the fact that he is a married man.
It also occurred before the 2016 election and there was clearly a benefit to quash the scandal as a candidate. That political motivation is at the heart of this long-delayed case.
It is a repeat of the case involving former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards. In 2012, the Justice Department used the same theory to charge the former Democratic presidential candidate after a disclosure that he not only had an affair with filmmaker Rielle Hunter but also hid the fact that he had a child by her. Edwards denied the affair, and money from donors was passed to Hunter to keep the matter quiet.
The Justice Department spent a huge amount on the case to show that the third-party payments were a circumvention of campaign finance laws. However, Edwards was ultimately found not guilty on one count while the jury deadlocked on the other five.
With Trump, the Justice Department declined a repeat of the Edwards debacle and did not bring any federal charge.
https://jonathanturley.org/2024/04/15/the-trump-trial-in-manhattan-is-an-indictment-of-the-new-york-legal-system/
2/2
But Bragg then used the alleged federal crime to bootstrap a defunct misdemeanor charge into a felony in the current case. He is arguing that Trump intentionally lied when his former lawyer Michael Cohen listed the payments as retainer costs rather than a payment — to avoid reporting it as a campaign contribution to himself.
Thus, if he had simply had Cohen report the payment as “hush money,” there would be no crime. (WTF)
Once again, the contrast to other controversies is telling. Before the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton’s campaign denied that it had funded the infamous Steele dossier behind the debunked Russian collusion claims.
Thefunding was hidden as legal expenses by then-Clinton campaign general counsel Marc Elias. (The FEC later sanctioned the campaign over its hiding of the funding.).
When a reporter tried to report the story, he said Elias “pushed back vigorously, saying ‘You (or your sources) are wrong.’” Times reporter Maggie Haberman declared, “Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year.”
Likewise, John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign chairman, was called before congressional investigators and denied categorically any contractual agreement with Fusion GPS.
Sitting beside him was Elias, who reportedly said nothing to correct the misleading information given to Congress.
Yet, there were no charges stemming from the hiding of the funding, though it was all part of the campaign budget. Making this assorted business even more repellent will be the appearance of Cohen himself on the stand. Cohen recently was denounced by a judge as a serial perjurer who is continuing to game the system.
Cohen has a long record as a legal thug who has repeatedly liedwhen it served his interests. He has a knack for selling his curious skill set to powerful figures like Trump and now Bragg.
For those of us who have been critics of Cohen from when he was still working for Trump,it is mystifying that anyone would call himto the stand to attest to anything short of the time of day . . . and even then most of us would check our watches.
Fortunately witnesses are no longer required to put their hand on the bible in swearing to testify truthfully in court.
Otherwise, the court would need the New York Fire Department standing by in case the book burst into flames.
So this is the case:A serial perjurer used to convert a dead state misdemeanor into a felonybased on an alleged federal election crime that was rejected by the Justice Department.
They could well succeed in a city where nine out of ten potential jurors despise Trump.
Trying Trump in Manhattan is about as difficult as the New York Yankees going to bat using beach balls rather than baseballs. It is hard to miss.
However,this is a Pyrrhic victory for the New York legal system. Whatever the outcome, it may prove a greater indictment of the New York court system than the defendant.
Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.
https://jonathanturley.org/2024/04/15/the-trump-trial-in-manhattan-is-an-indictment-of-the-new-york-legal-system/
(now would be a good time for God to send his justice to the participants in this case, for lying and using it to destroy our President. Whatever Bidan et al do, President Trump will always be our president.)
I kinda think Turley is starting to see the left is a bit crazy and radical.