Anonymous ID: 580066 April 15, 2024, 11:57 a.m. No.20728836   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8844 >>9464 >>9570

Constitutional Law, Courts, Criminal law April 13, 2024 (This one is pretty funny)

“Nonsensical”: Another Federal Judge Rejects All of Hunter Biden’s Claims for Dismissal

 

While some legal analysts continue to boost Hunter Biden’s legal claims, the reviews in actual courts are far less glowing. Recently, we discussed a federal 'judge rejecting all eight motions of Hunter Biden to dismiss his tax charges in a stinging opinion citing a conspicuous lack of actual evidence to support their claims. Now, U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika has also rejected those claims in the gun case in Delaware, calling Hunter’s arguments “nonsensical.

 

Legal experts like MSNBC’sAndew Weissmann have slammedthe gun charges as “an abuse.” Hunter Biden’s counsel has argued selective prosecution and a bar on charges (based on the defunct notorious plea deal) in both cases. While these arguments were given great credence on some networks, they were stomped on by actual judges applying the law to the case.

 

Abby Lowell and Hunter’s defense team have insisted that he is the victim of selective prosecution, but Special Counsel David Weiss has eviscerated those claims. In a recent filing, Weiss dismissed many of Hunter’s claims as“patently false”and noted that he virtually flaunted his violations and engaged in obvious efforts to evade taxes and hide his crimes.

 

Weiss further noted thatother defendants did not write “a memoirin which they madecountless statements proving their crimesand drawing further attention to their criminal conduct.” (KEK)

 

It was a devastating take-down of Hunter’s claims, but it did not address the conspicuous omission of charges brought against Menendez, including FARA charges.

 

It also does not address the fact that the Justice Department not only allowed the statute of limitations to run on major crimes, but sought to finalize an obscene plea agreement with no jail time for Hunter. It only fell apart when a judge decided to ask a couple of cursory questions of the prosecutor, who admitted that he had never seen an agreement this generous for a defendant. Weiss noted in his filing that they filed new charges only after Hunter’s legal counsel refused to change the agreement and insisted that it remained fully enforceable.

 

Judge Noreika is equally unimpressed by the arguments of the Biden team. 'She almost mockingly noted that “Defendant’s articulated protected class is apparently family members of politically-important persons.” She later added:

 

Defendant’s claim is effectively that his own father targeted him for being his son, a claim that is nonsensical under the facts here. Regardless of whether Congressional Republicans attempted to influence the Executive Branch, there is no evidence that they were successful in doing so and, in any event, the Executive Branch prosecuting Defendant was at all relevant times (and still is) headed by Defendant’s father.”

 

The court also rejected Hunter Biden’s effort to subpoena Trump, former attorney general Bill Barr, and two other senior officials who served in the Trump Justice Department.Again, she noted that it was the Biden administration that decided to prosecute Hunter Biden on the firearms offenses.

 

Here is the decision: Hunter Biden Gun Decision

 

https://jonathanturley.org/2024/04/13/nonsensical-another-federal-judge-rejects-all-of-hunter-bidens-claims-for-dismissal/

Anonymous ID: 580066 April 15, 2024, 12:40 p.m. No.20729024   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9464 >>9570

Academia, Criminal law April 11, 2024

Berkeley Prosecutors Cut Probation Deal for Scientist Who Tried to Kill Colleague

(CCP paid off the cops and judge is my guess)

 

I have been a criminal defense attorney for my entire career, butthere is a case out of Berkeley, California that is a real head scratcher. David Xu was the chief metallurgist for a company called Berkeley Engineering and Research (BEAR) andwas caught on tape trying to poison a colleague. His actions are blamed for not only causing harm to Rong Yuan, but her parents. After spending only 10 days in jail, Alameda Countyprosecutors and a judge signed off on a probation deal in the case.

 

Xu was arrested back in 2019 after Yuan became suspicious that her illness (which she thought might be cancer) might be related to a water bottle that she used at work. When her parents used the bottle to cook, they also became ill.She set up a spy camera at work and caught David Xu tampering with the water bottle. It was tested and found to contain “extraordinarily high levels of cadmium, a poisonous heavy metal.”

 

That seems a pretty strong case for two counts of poisoning and an attempted murder prosecution.

 

Yet, theprosecutors dropped the attempted murder charge and accepted a pleaon the two poisoning counts. Then a probation officer recommended no jail time. The officer wrote that:

 

“The defendant is highly educated and living at home with his wife and children. He is employed and earning a stable income. Although this matter represents the first and only offense, it was serious in nature and could have resulted in death or serious illness of the victims…. It is the hopes of this deputy that the defendant will take advantage of this second chance and can satisfactorily complete this probation.”

 

Even on the two poisoning counts, one would expect some jail time. This man hurt three people and could have killed a colleague.

 

Yet, Alameda County DA Pamela Price signed off on letting Xu spend less than two weeks in jail for his crimes.

 

It is not clear what it takes to get actual jail time in Alameda County under Price. The San Francisco Chronicle was unable to get sentencing data from her office and Price is the subject of a recall campaign over her lax enforcement record.

 

https://jonathanturley.org/2024/04/11/berkeley-prosecutors-cut-probation-deal-for-scientist-who-tried-to-kill-colleague/#more-217850

Anonymous ID: 580066 April 15, 2024, 12:51 p.m. No.20729060   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20729053

He's only like by MAGA, not many MAGA in Congress. He said himself, the RINOs would never allow it, MAGA has to get more than 86 America First reps. Hopefully some of the RINOS will be replaced this year.

Anonymous ID: 580066 April 15, 2024, 12:54 p.m. No.20729075   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9083 >>9099

>>20728982

Interesting this is not only the 150 year anniversary of Lincoln's Death, it's also the 5th anniversary of the burning down of Notre Dam. You know how these Satanists like their dates and numbers.

Anonymous ID: 580066 April 15, 2024, 12:56 p.m. No.20729085   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9464 >>9570 >>9599

This whole Trump case is a COUP: "They're The Destroying The City": Zere Reveals How Biden's Migrant Crisis Is Eroding New York City. Plus what is happening in the Trump trial today

 

12:05

 

https://rumble.com/embed/v4n1k0n/?pub=4

Anonymous ID: 580066 April 15, 2024, 1:13 p.m. No.20729168   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9183 >>9464 >>9570

(picture of McKesson the aggressor)

15 Apr, 2024 17:12

Policeman can sue Black Lives Matter activist – US Supreme Court

Critics argue the ruling sets a dangerous precedent threatening free speech and right to assembly

Policeman can sue Black Lives Matter activist – US Supreme Court

 

A Louisiana police officer will be allowed to press charges against BLM organizerDeRay McKesson after losing several teeth and suffering brain damage during a civil rights protest, the US Supreme Court has ruled.

 

In July 2016, McKesson led a Black Lives Matter demonstration in Baton Rouge over the fatal police shooting of an armed black man named Alton Sterling. During the protest, Officer John Ford was injured by a rock or piece of concrete thrown by one of the activists, who has remained unidentified.

 

Ford’s lawsuit claimed McKesson should have known the protest would turn violentwhen it started and is therefore liable for his injuries. Initially dismissed by a district judge, it was revived last year by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear McKesson’s appeal.

 

McKesson was arrested by Baton Rouge police on the day of the protest but was later released and charges against him were dropped. In November 2016, the city paid out a $100,000 settlement to 92 activists arrested during the riot, amounting to about $230 a person after legal fees.

 

Backed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), McKesson had argued before the Fifth Circuit that he was engaging in free speech and assembly activities protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. In a 1982 case involving black civil rights activists in Mississippi, the Supreme Court ruled that participants in such activities were shielded from liability arising from the conduct of others.

 

The appeals court rejected this line of argument, though one dissenting judge invoked Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s 1965 march in Alabama and said that political upheavals – from marches to riots – have “marked our history from the beginning.”

 

Judge Don Willett argued that the majority’s legal theory “would have enfeebled America’s street-blocking civil rights movement, imposing ruinous financial liability against citizens for exercising core First Amendment freedoms.”

 

The ACLU has warned that the ruling could set a precedent, making it easier to sue protest leaders for illegal conduct of attendees, which would “stifle activism seeking political or societal change,” according to Reuters.

 

McKesson was one of the early leaders of the Black Lives Matter movement, which claimed that police across the US were racist and too aggressive towards African Americans.The district judge that rejected Ford’s initial lawsuit had argued that Black Lives Matter is an idea and not an entity, and therefore can’t be sued. (If they have a body then they are not an idea, doesn’t matter what they name themselves. Cop out just like Antifa, which Chris Wray backed.)

 

https://www.rt.com/news/596003-blm-activist-sued-protest/

Anonymous ID: 580066 April 15, 2024, 1:23 p.m. No.20729238   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Isn't this wonderful news anonsWe thought we had craziness at the max, but hey, why not make people more crazy so they don't notice Muslims taking over their countries, and Muslims especially hate any kind of fags, so another way to depopulate the real citizens. Brilliantly evil idea!

 

https://www.rt.com/news/595997-german-parliament-sex-change-once-year-law/

Anonymous ID: 580066 April 15, 2024, 2:16 p.m. No.20729483   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9570

(KEK, seems like the Bidan, Dems, Ukraine and RINOs propaganda on Russia is not working out so well==)

14 Apr, 2024 20:56

US Republicans trust Trump over the Pentagon – poll

The party’s voters see the former president as a more reliable source of information about the Russia-Ukraine conflict

 

America’s Republican voters believe former President Donald Trump is a more reliable source of information about the Russia-Ukraine conflict than either their government or the media, a new poll has shown.

 

The CBS News/YouGov survey, released on Sunday, found that 79% of Republicans trust Trump for information on the Ukraine crisis. That compares with 60% trust for the US military, 56% for conservative media outlets, 33% for “journalists in the war zone,” andjust 27% for the US State Department.

 

The poll, which was conducted earlier this week, also showed waning public support for continuing to send weapons to Kiev. Just 53% of US adults believe their government should give military aid to Ukraine, down from 72% two years ago. While 74% of Democrats favor continued weapons shipments, independents are evenly divided (50%-50%), and 61% of Republicans are opposed.

 

Opposition to Ukraine aid is even higher among Trump supporters, 69% of whom say the US should not send more munitions to Kiev. Among other Republicans, 55% hold the same view, and 45% say Washington should continue to arm Ukrainian forces.

 

Republicans also are less likely to view Russia as an adversary. Just 29% of Republican voters say Moscow is an “enemy” compared with 47% of Democrats and 36% of independents. More than three in ten (31%) of Republicans see Russia as an “ally,” the poll found, while 40% say it’s “unfriendly.”

 

Views of Russia vary not only by political party, but also by age. Americans aged 50 and above – old enough to have been an adult during the Cold War – are about 50% more likely than younger respondents to see Russia as an “enemy.” However, only one-third of US adults realize that their country won the Cold War. Other responses were that the US lost (5%), neither won nor lost (32%) or “don’t remember” (30%).

 

Support for Ukraine aid is highest (72%) among Americans who believe the US has a “responsibility to promote democracy” across the world, the poll showed. Among those who see no such obligation for their country, only 28% believe Washington should give military aid to Ukraine'''.

 

Just 39% of US adults approve of how President Joe Biden is handling the Ukraine crisis. Similarly, 33% approve of Biden’s response to the Israel-Hamas war. Six in ten Americans say their president should urge Israel to either scale back or halt its military operations in Gaza.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/595952-republicans-trust-trump-over-pentagon-on-ukraine-poll/