Anonymous ID: ee9e14 April 16, 2024, 12:21 a.m. No.20731694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1698 >>1958

>>20731344

>>20731369

>>20731374

👆️👆️👆️👆️👆️👆️👆️

That, there, is synchronicity; yet synchronicity negates causality which, presently, is present.

High correlation? Definitely, yes.

Related? Definitely, yes.

Was attempted in the past yet somehow fell apart? Definitely, yes.

The question then becomes one of construct: Was the A.I. comment, correct?

Does the other primary party "know"?

I do not recall a coat.

Are other parties aware? Yes.

Coats? Yes.

How connected?

https://youtu.be/rSGnNMnvM6M?t=531&si=dVemF6q6-jHxVJbU

The pieces of the puzzle begin to take shape.