2 people calling for all of these to be notable:
But NONE of them have source links. Most don't even say where the article is from.
Just a heads up.
Oh, and I'm not agreeing with them btw. I just wanted to point out they are not linked to source & don't say where article is from
It's alllll talked about in depth in previous thread. But you know that already doncha!
IF YOU CAN DODGE A WRENCH, YOU CAN DODGE A SHILL!
*Now picture a big Q in that wheelchair :)
I still don't understand why they are harping on RR for those documents right now. They HAVE to know that a lot of them are part of different investigations & they don't want to show what they have yet to the people under investigation. I mean at the very LEAST they know the 302's are going to be used to clear Flynn. AND RR even said that the FISA warrant he signed wasn't the one that is public. So theres that investigation…They have to know this. I think that's really the only part I'm still confused on
That ID posted NOTHING with links to Sources. Nothing saying where the article came from
That too, but with the shilling going on, I'm SURE one of them would say
"OMG! YOU DONT THINK Q POSTS ARE NOTABLE?!"
lol…But The no source linked to those articles is really sketchy, especially given whats going on the last 18 hours
What does that have to do with what I asked…So you are saying he wants to fuck up all these ongoing investigations that are ALSO important to go after U1? Doubt it. U1 will get investigated but not at the expense of ongoing FISA/Flynn/Leaks/etc etc investigations
That dude is totally stalking you.
No. NONE of them link to ANY source. They don't even say what publication they are from. This was all discussed at beginning of this thread. Are you trying to start this shit all over again?!!?
Find all SOURCES & link them to each one. Otherwise just stop
You are so much nicer than I am lol. Hopefully they listen to you