>>2073952

>>2073903

Oh Shit anons. Look at this!

The Ultimate Question: Is The Plan to Collapse The Entire Branch of the Judiciary??

The article Q highlighted is not about Qanon, it's about eliminating the Judiciary!!!!!

>"Q's drops may actually be aiding an attempt to dismantle the judiciary altogether. Should it succeed in pushing this distrust across the public….this narrative may actually serve to weaponize Americans into removing the only barrier left to toppling democracy and clearing the way for an EMPORER to ascend to the throne."

"But what if this is the actual plan?"

http://www.amerika.org/politics/qanon-the-path-to-dictatorship/

>>2073952

>They can end this at any time simply by asking POTUS, right?

That's right! End the Judiciary NOW!

>>2074045

They look just like more Q proofs. IMO, not notable.

>>2074192

military tribunals baby

>>2074200

Fuck you. Did you even read the article Q posted???

>>2074180

Are you fucking stupid? Did you read the article Q posted with his Ultimate Question Post? Damn.

>>2074237

>>2074280

>>2074270

Let me spell it out for you faggots. Look at the damn pic. This is Q's post, not mine. HE linked the article and then asked what is the ultimate question? It is not my question. Read the damn article before jumping my shit about this. READ IT!

There is a question in it.

But what if this is the actual plan?'

This is not MY question. But it sure as hell seems like it's the question Q wants asked. What if it is the ACTUAL PLAN?

How many times has Q said to

TRUST THE PLAN.

How many times has Potus said the system is corrupt?

Discount it if you want, makes no difference to me. But don't say you weren't warned.

>>2074252

whatever man. All I know is the clues Q gives us and the total dysfunction of the judiciary system. (Awan?) We better start paying attention. Q sure isn't asking about WhoIsQ.

>>2074436

He linked it and asked that question. Take it to mean what you want. If that is their plan, I think we need to know.

My first thought was yeah, justifies the use of tribunals. But I do not want to be ruled by an Emporer not by the military.

>>2074305

it's a no-win situation, kek

>>2074447

He's been doing that for months now. Nothing new there.

>>2074558

I think you'll find the worst offenders are paid to be here to cause discourse, divide. discredit, etc. Also, many anons are at the end of the rope. This has been 8 months of pure torture. And no relief in sight. Being kind will get kind in return, usually.

I agree about R. Forgot about the sig. Take what he says as tho from an anon. I too want to see the culture here improve. Just don't see it happening because of the nature of the board.

A little disappointed others do not see what the ultimate question is.

>>2074589

Doesn't negate the fact he has said it before and said it often.

>>2074687

Not notable to me.

>>2074730

He linked a post that contain the article and then asked those questions. I'm not exaggerating idiot. Look at it for yourself. And I never said any fucking thing about endorsing it. Just stop replying.