Anonymous ID: 64a50e July 7, 2018, 3:44 p.m. No.2074065   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4114

Can an actual anon help me understand why SLP is a compromised news site? Looked at their articles, did a little digging…. seems to be a fine news site.

 

Why all the anons screaming foul about this? Smells Shilly.

Anonymous ID: 64a50e July 7, 2018, 3:55 p.m. No.2074170   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2074114

Didn’t find one fucking thing that discredits the source. I wouldn’t be asking if I did. U obviously don’t have an answer for me. Thx for shilling tho.

Anonymous ID: 64a50e July 7, 2018, 4:10 p.m. No.2074321   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4443 >>4454 >>4499 >>4552 >>4605

GREAT, a thousand anons hate on SLP and not a single one of you faggots can offer me any proof why I should believe they are compromised

 

Def smells like pelican shit to me.

 

Seriously anons, I’ve been digging and haven’t found anything that says we should be comparing them to infowars or even cnn, as some anons have done.

 

What’s the hang up about SLP? Somebody please reply with sauce on why they’re compromised. Would love to know. Thx.

Anonymous ID: 64a50e July 7, 2018, 4:20 p.m. No.2074401   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4541

>>2074347

Hey BO… why is everyone piling on SLP like they're some compromised outlet… I still can't figure out what is making anons so butt hurt about this shit?

 

Look over SLP's site, dig a little and tell me it's not clear they're on my side.

 

I've asked for sauce and for anons to show me why this SLP is some clown operation but the evidence just isn't there.

Anonymous ID: 64a50e July 7, 2018, 4:31 p.m. No.2074501   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4555

>>2074454

>>2074464

 

No, I fucked it up cus I barely know about the source… and upon multiple requests from anons who are bashing it, I ask for sauce on why I should discredit them and consider them compromised, said anons reply with absolutely nothig…. as seen in both your dumb ass replies. Thx for helping!

 

Lurq Moar, then kys.

Anonymous ID: 64a50e July 7, 2018, 4:33 p.m. No.2074517   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4531 >>4554 >>4702

>>2074499

Seriously anon…. I have yet to see any advice… even half ass speculation which should lead to me discrediting the SLP and they can't offer up anything. Kinda weird… nothing in notables about it either. Why are we supposed to be writing off this media outlet again?

Anonymous ID: 64a50e July 7, 2018, 4:36 p.m. No.2074541   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4564

>>2074347

>>2074401

Sorry BO, meant to say BLP… it's a new acronym for me… but seriously, please enlighten us as to the credibility of this news agency?

 

They're taking more flacc than cnn does out here and I can't figure out why. Their articles seen in line with our message.

Anonymous ID: 64a50e July 7, 2018, 4:51 p.m. No.2074678   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4750

>>2074059

Thx for reposting those. I went back and read the Atlantic article you posted… I'm still confused. How does this show that SLP is a badoutfit? If anything, reading between the lines here leads any anon to see they are someone we would get behind.

 

How is Jack Posobiec related to BLP? You can't just post some pics of Posobiec and claim he's involved with BLP?

 

I'll repost your article SS's here so anons can read it themselves. This is evidence in support of BLP, in my opinion.