TYB
"Christ is King"
Why?
Because Jesus broke through the matrix, the false narrative, the 'notion' (it always has been and always will be merely a 'notion' without substance) that humanity is divided by ethnicity or religion, that the logical structure of the human mind differs between people by race, class or nation, this is why Christ is King.
>That didn't work.
That right there didn't work/
>Xi murdered 20% of the Chinese population just to say he fixed poverty. That's the biggest documented genocide, to date.
No it isn't, nice try though.
The biggest documented genocides were perpetrated by the Communists under Stalin, Mao, by absolute numbers, and Pol Pot by relative numbers.
Mockery, knowing it was buckling under blackmail.
>Majority of us still banned.
Anon just guessing, but maybe the threat of 'infiltration' is still far too great, similar to the Q drop when Q confirmed that the reason Secret Service took everybody's Q shirt away at a rally was because they learned of a threat by the cult to kill or shoot or do something sinister under false flag of Q.
But no harm in forwarding this list to Elon.
You're just trying to put the world under your preferred "better" chains, anon.
>Christ is "King" (tm) because theytoldyou he is.
No, Anon says Christ is King because the message, the information, the teachings, are Kingly.
>but all these "organized" (tm) religious are a cancer on humanity, as a species.
What would you say in response to philosophers who allege that the abstract concept of "humanity" is just another God concept, another religion, to constrain and limit the individual from doing anything they want as a "unique" being?
They say "Humanism" is just a more recent iteration of an ongoing system of chains to brainwash people to keep them under control.
What say you?
BTW, Christ is King is not trademarked, putting (tm) there is silly and stupid.
No, Jesus was awakening the world to the filth that is coming from you.
Revelation 2:9, biatch.
SP is a meme pattern not a person.
As much as some try to 'personify' the information, so that they can attack the person as a substitute for attacking the messages, because they can't refute the messages, they will never succeed.
It's why they're going mental in naming anons as specific ethnicities or religions, as if that even means anything other than the labeller's own psychology, they're in chaos like a bunch of chickens with their heads cut off.
As much as you try to push the false narrative that Satan controls Judaism, you're only revealing your panic that that false narrative isn't succeeding in protecting the cult and can't use millions of people as human shields.
Soros doesn't "represent" anyone.
>Wrong. I'm making a point, quite clear. Your religious beliefs are just that:yours
Anon was making a point. Why deny Anon what you claim you are free to do?
When you emphasize "yours", you're just manifesting the form of the chains you want to impose into the world, the chains that are "yours".
>The "message" (tm) is written in text that can't be verified as fact.
The moral teachings are facts.
>It's that simple. Just 'cos youbelieveit, doesn't make it true, Anon.
That is a trivial truth that betrays your own statements. By your own logic, everything you "believe" doesn't make it true.
>You'll believe that you were lied to about humanity's history, but can't fathom you were lied to via religious ideology.
Anon is not denying that there are lies said by people.
But that doesn't mean all religion is a lie.
>Then I would say they're still deeply entrenched in religious idiocy.
Think you misunderstood, I am talking about philosophers who explicitly stated that what YOU are advocating is just another form of "religious idiocy". That you're not in fact proposing any escape from religion, but imposing just another form of it.
>As I sad before, if you want to believe in that shit, it'syourbusiness.
Why do you say this as if you're not totally and completely bound by that very same principle? That all the shit you're writing here is nothing but your business to seemingly be kept to yourself?
Why do you get to write as if what you write is "objective" whereas everything anon writes is "just anon's opinion"?
>All the Abrahamic Triumvirates are a disease.
None of you can just keep your shit to yourselves. No, you have to "spread the word" (tm) even when people don't want to hear it
Isn't that what you yourself are doing right here and now? That you can't just keep your shit to yourself, that you have to write what youbelieve, as if anons have to see it and not just you thinking it?
>and with all the bullshit we've seen in just the past 50 years or so, all the wars and death we've seen thanks to you and your cousin religion, you think you're going to makeanyheadway with me? Kek.
Stalin and Mao were the biggest genociders ever, and they were atheists.
>Your belief in an invisible "God" (tm) is "silly and stupid," but I digress…
Love is invisible, does that mean it doesn't exist?
>But what war is America in?
Hello Mr. Sacks, we direct your attention to the southern border where there is an INVASION taking place.
>Trump’s attorneys countered that the social media posts in question “do not establish any willful violations,”and claimed that reposts of other people’s statements do not constitute violations.
Indeed. The world has Q+'s back.
Has Rand Paul gone into the SCIF yet?
Heard a rumor that everyone anti-FISA who go in, come out pro-FISA.
Q said "FISA goes both ways".
hmmm