Notice how ALL babies are blood typed at birth? It is the FIRST thing done and that data goes
somewhere.
MOST interesting, no?
THE BIBLE CODE was, of course, an elaborate hoax…but created much buzz some years back.
Now imagine if all of human history were encoded in the DNA helix and could be accessed in its
completeness! Wouldn't THAT be interesting!
Now consider that all human history, both "past" and "future" were so encoded! Wouldn't you like
to have a drop of THAT precious blood…and the necessary decoding "software"? Would you trade
a few gold tokens for a roadmap of human history and HUMAN FUTURE?
laughing, laughing, laughing!! out loud!!!
And, DEAR BICKLE!! Should you be so blessed to carry this information!! Would you SHARE this
information with those who are clearly not evolved enough to handle it? Imagine what mischief
could be carried out by these little rhesis monkeys armed with the knowledge of the "gods"!
I'm sure YOU, dear Bickle, would be oh so careful and only use this knowledge for GOOD, not
EVIL…oh, ok, perhaps you would have a little taste of the good things in "life"…perhaps a few
would die…but hey…YOU are BICKLE…you deserve such things!
Good eye anon, damn bro
I woke you out of that lurk slumber I see
I would like to know how [they] keep track of their "hidden" children and how many bastards
whoops I mean hidden extentions there are and what that means.
HAHAHA Dear Bickle!
As I stated earlier, if you wish to indoctrinate a child into the way of the wolf, you would put the
child, at an early age, into the wolf's den! The eagle chick belongs in the eagles nest.
Notice how ALL babies are blood typed at birth? It is the FIRST thing done and that data goes
somewhere.
MOST interesting, no?
Something about blood lines.. .. You constantly hear about the reptilian blood line being
RH Negative, that the elites are RH Negative.. is this true?
Any RH- anons here with weird traits?
Who are the "Children of Israel?" Why was their seed blessed? Why were they told not to
inter-marry with other people and to circumcise their sons for identification? Why were they
told to preserve their geneology? Where did Adam and Eve's sons go to get their wives, if
they were the only "humans" on earth?
Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates. They have much
proof to back up their theories, including modern blood analysis and comparative studies
between modern man and lower anthripoids, such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus
monkey.
It has been proven that the majority of mankind (85%) has a blood factor common with the
rhesus monkey. This is called rhesus positive blood. Usually shortened to Rh positive. This
factor is completely independent from the A, B, 0 blood types.
In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had…except in
the case of environmental or selective mutation. We can have any of numerous combinations
of traits inherited from all of our ancestors. Nothing more and nothing less. Therefore, if man
and ape evolved from a common ancestor, their blood would have evolved the same way.
Blood factors are transmitted with much more biological precision than any other
characteristic. It could be argued from scientific scrutiny that modern man and rhesus
monkey have had a common ancestor sometime in the "past". All other earthly primates
share this Rh factor. But this leaves out the people who are Rh negative. If all mankind
evolved from the same ancestor their blood would be compatible. Where did the Rh
negatives come from? If they are not the descendants of prehistoric man, could they be the
descendants of planetary travelers?
All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their
species. Relative size and color makes no difference. Why does infant's haemolytic disease
occur in humans if all humans are the same species? Haemolytic disease is the allergic
reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child. Her blood
builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby
destroying the infant. Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring? Nowhere else in
nature does this occur naturally. This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a
horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding
between two similar but genetically different species.
Why does "science" (ie, the little peoples science)fail to explain how Rh negative is possible?
I'm an expert at trolling for topics that you control freaks don't like discussed.
It seems, I have found it.
Those familiar with blood factors, admit that Rh - humans must at minimum, be a mutation
(if not descendants) of a different ancestor. If a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why
does it continue with the exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor,
if it was within their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor? Difficulties in determining
ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene
characteristic and not affected by the environment.
The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood.
About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene. The average
is only 15%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little. The Oriental jewish people of
Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only
about 1% Rh negative. The Samaritans and the Black Cochin jewish also have a high
percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most
black people.
Could the Basque people be one of these colonies? Or could it have been the original colony
on earth? The origin of the Basques is unknown. Their language is unlike any other
European language. Some believe that Basque was the original language of the book of
Genesis. Some believe it was the original language of the world and possibly of the creator.
Genesis 6:2 "The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them
wives, all of which they chose." Who were the children of these marriages? Genesis 6:4 "God
came into the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, and the same became
mighty of old." From the King James Bible dictionary we find: "menchildren - men of Israel,
male children of God, not children of man - Ex. 34:23." Ex. 34:7 states "The iniquity of the
father will be unto the children unto the fourth generation." It is plain that something is
inherited, could it be the blood?
The American Indians had the tradition of making good friends, "blood brothers", if they
thought they were worthy. Could this tradition have been for a reason? Could they have
actually been checking to see if they were blood brothers (the same type blood)? The
clumping (aggulation) that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is
visible to the naked eye. Could they have been told, by their ancestors, that their blood was
different from that of the rest of mankind except for their brothers and sisters, from other
tribes, scattered throughout the earth. Indian tradition declares that their ancestors were of
cosmic origin. The Indian totem pole is actually a family genealogy.
Why all this preoccupation with genealogy among different people scattered throughout the
earth? No other animal on earth has this preoccupation with ancestry. Where did this
tradition come from? People scattered throughout the earth, who have had no-known
contact with each other all simultaneously have the urge to chart their family tree? Why?
How important could this have been to primitive cave men? Struggling to survive, to chart
their genealogy? They had no understanding of modern genetics and inheritance. So why
should they preserve their genealogy? Were they told to preserve their heritage, until a
future date when they would return and it would be understood? Until a time, like now,
when their descendent would be able to understand the message they were leaving.