>>2071324 (lb or before)

The anon pushing this needs to just post the article and let the hive mind take over. That's the way it works in here. Pushing it too much makes most anons suspicious.

The article does have disinformation in it, intentional or not, and we all know what they are (interviewing anons, leaders, we are all Q, etc.). I personally think the "byline writer" was not the actual author so there could be a good reason for this. On the other side of the coin it serves the purpose of exposing normies to Q and making them curious. I wouldn't get too negative or positive about the actual article.