“Pro-rape” child safety officer for Google was just fired…

April 19, 2024 (12 hours ago)

Sometimes the trash takes itself out. Case in point: Dr. Kate S., a proud “rape apologist” who was part of Google’s “child safety” team, has just been shown the door. She made headlines for all the wrong reasons after a past tweet of hers went viral. In it, she chastised “Karens” for holding “men of color” responsible for rape. Yes, you heard that right. This disturbing tweet from the so-called Google “child safety” strategist left decent people absolutely floored. It’s a really frightening reminder of who’s been in charge of what we’re supposed to consider “safety” online.

Here’s what Dr. Kate S. had to say about “Karen” women who complain about being raped:

listen to what these karens are actually saying: the sensationalist/vague words, extreme numbers, secondhand accounts describing imagined violence at the cost of ACTUAL violence on the ground in Palestine /

as feminists we should care abt mothers giving birth w/o medical aid, girls too malnourished for puberty, women w/o menstruation pads AND fathers uncles sons who are caretaking their communities feminism is #ceasefireNOW, #freePalestine next, and anti-militarism 5ever

But believe it or not, it actually gets worse. In another tweet, the good doctor weighed in again on “Karens” and their bothersome “rapey” complaints:

“do not be swayed by karens and their crocodile imperial feminism against rape. it plays right into long tradition of yt women weaponizing femininity/motherhood to discipline/punish men of color Emmett Till, Vincent Chen, Rassenschande — all in the name of white sexuality”

Here’s a closeup of her tweet:

Well, we are very pleased to announce that this disturbing, sick, and perverted woman, who was supposedly “protecting children,” has been fired from her position at Google. But hold the applause. Before you think that Google suddenly grew a conscience and actually cares about kids and women, think again.They didn’t fire her because she’s pro-rape. No, they let her go because she participated in some hour-long event aiming to “take over” Google due to their contracts with Israel.

As a side note, people who look like this, expect to be taken seriously.

(Kek Google upset about protests in their office, while they actively direct protests WW, weird!and the Marxist/Communists can work there but not be free.)

Let’s be honest, that’s a lot of mental illness in one photo, folks. Needless to say, pro-rape activist Kate S. took to X, where she announced that she had been fired.

This woman exemplifies what a full-blown Marxist radical looks and sounds like. And guess what? These are the types of people who are in charge of social media. They label us “degenerates” while controlling what we can say and think. It’s downright terrifying to consider the amount of power and influence they wield over public discourse

Here’s what the popular X account “Libs of TikTok” had to say about Kate S’s firing:

FAFO: The r*pe apologist who was in charge of “child safety” at Google claims she was fired today after participating in an hours-long protest and takeover of Google offices.

Sometimes the problems take care of themselves.

Google isn’t the real world; it’s more like a daycare for mentally sick adults. And it seems the inmates who were running the asylum are starting to realize that even the most unhinged corporations have their limits. It’s a shame that being “pro-rape” isn’t enough to get you fired from Google, which just goes to show the depth of the cesspool we’re dealing with. However, the good news is that they’re not too big to fall. Much like the US, Google is facing its own kind of internal demolition at the hands of radical left-wing crazies, like Dr. Kate S. Sure, it’s a slow burn, but one that could eventually lead to their downfall, God willing.

https://revolver.news/2024/04/pro-rape-child-safety-officer-for-google-was-just-fired/

>>20747703

If you the crazies an inch, they’ll take a mile. PS: always remember Antifa is just an idea. Wray said so, so we should believe him.

When did the IBF become a terrorist organization?

==Trump cuts into Biden’s lead among young people, poll finds

The president is still leading with people under 30, but by smaller margins than four years ago.==

By LISA KASHINSKY

04/18/2024 05:00 AM EDT

Former President Donald Trump is cutting deeper into President Joe Biden’s lead among young voters, according to a new poll.

Biden leads Trump, 45 percent to 37 percent, among people ages 18 to 29 in a Harvard Youth Poll released Thursday, with 16 percent undecided. That 8 percentage point margin is much smaller than at this point in the 2020 election. At that time, Biden was leading Trump by 23 percentage points among young people.

Biden’s margins widen when the pool is restricted to registered and likely voters. But, still, his 19-point lead over Trump among the voters under 30 who are considered likely to turn out is significantly smaller than his 30-point advantage this time four years ago.

Biden holds wide leads among likely voters who are non-white and women — up by 43 points and 33 points over Trump, respectively. He trounces Trump among the higher-educated set, leading the presumptive Republican nominee by 47 points among likely voters who are college graduates and 23 points among college students.

But Biden’s margins are far slimmer — or nonexistent — among other key demographics. He’s just 6 percentage points ahead of Trump among likely voters who are young men, according to the poll, and just 3 points ahead among white voters. When it comes to young people without college degrees, Biden and Trump are in a dead heat.

And though there are fewer of them, Trump’s younger voters are far more enthusiastic about the former president than their peers who are backing Biden, according to the poll. More than three-quarters of Trump voters said they enthusiastically support the Republican, while just 44 percent of Biden voters said the same.

“Make no mistake, this is a different youth electorate than we saw in 2020 and 2022, and young voters are motivated by different things,” John Della Volpe, polling director for the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics and an expert on polling young voters, said in a statement.

“Economic issues are top of mind, housing is a major concern — and the gap between young men’s and young women’s political preferences is pronounced,” he said.

The Harvard youth survey is the latest to show Trump rising among the nation’s youngest voters, another potential warning sign for Democrats whose presidential candidates have long been able to successfully court that bloc.

Indeed, while Biden’s lead is 26 points among likely voters ages 25 to 29, it falls to 14 points among those ages 18 to 24.

Still, the survey shows some reasons for concern for Trump, too. Biden’s overall lead grows if the former president is convicted in any of his criminal trials, with the Democrat jumping up 10 points among all young adults, 8 points among registered voters and 9 points among likely voters.

But third-party candidates threaten to erode Biden’s margins, putting more data behind a scenario Democrats have long feared. Biden would still win the youth vote with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Cornel West and Jill Stein on the ballot, the Harvard pollsters said, but potentially only by a handful of points.

And Biden’s job approval rating among younger adults is just 31 percent.

Meanwhile, Biden’s approach to the ongoing Israel-Hamas war could cost him at the ballot box. More than half of young adults, 51 percent, support a permanent cease-fire in Gaza — which Biden has stopped short of calling for — a viewpoint that cuts across party and demographic lines. Just 10 percent of young people oppose it.

Just a fifth of young Americans believe Israel’s response to Hamas’ Oct. 7 incursion is justified, while 32 percent believe it is not.

(Kek Harvard poll and college students, what could go wrong.)

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/18/poll-trump-cuts-into-bidens-lead-among-young-people-00152970

>>20747760

I really like to see politico and dems freaking out about polls

>>20747760

If they have a lot of undecided, they are decided they just don’t want to tell anyone

>>20747785

Oh that right BlM was an idea, wait no Wray said it in a Congress meeting too. He said Antifa was unorganized and no head to lead. I remember it distinctly, its more like a loosely connected idea.

During J6 arguments, Gorsuch references Kavanaugh hearing where 200 ‘insurrectionists’ were arrested…

1/2

The Supreme Court is right now in the thick of a heated debate over a federal obstruction statute that’s been used to go after hundreds of January 6th political prisoners. This isn’t just any legal tussle—it has massive implications for these punished patriots and also for the election interference case against President Trump.

Everyone’s watching closely.

The case at the heart of all this is Fischer v. United States. The big question is: Can federal prosecutors use a law created after the Enron scandal to punish the January 6 defendants? This law makes it a crime to “corruptly” obstruct or impede an official proceeding. But defense attorneys are pushing back hard. They argue that the DOJ is using this law as a “dragnet” to catch and punish those who disagree with the current regime. Before January 6, this statute wasn’t even on the radar unless there was some level of evidence-tampering involved. But now, it seems like it’s being used to silence anyone who goes against the Biden regime, unfairly targeting over 350 J6 defendants. It’s yet another disgusting example of how legal powers can be twisted to clamp down on dissent and make an example out of those who stand up to the powers that be.

It’s anybody’s guess how the justices will swing on this one, especially in today’s supercharged political climate.Yet, Justice Gorsuch is already tearing into Biden’s DOJ, which seems set on painting their protestersas the only ones who “protest the right way.” Gorsuch isn’t buying any of that twisted logic.

End Wokeness:

Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch nukes Joe Biden’s DOJ over January 6th sentences:

Gorsuch lists multiple cases of folks who “obstructed a Congressional proceeding” without receiving a 20 year sentence.

1. Sit-ins at a trial (Kavanaugh protests)

2. Pulling a fire alarm (Rep. Bowman)

3. Hecklers in the crowd (Palestine)

4. Mostly-peaceful protests (BLM)

So, in a nutshell, DOJ attorneyElizabeth Prelogar is arguing that the difference between the January 6 defendants and all the other radical left-wing protests, like BLM Marxists, Kavanaugh whackos, Pro-Hamas radicals, climate nuts, etc., is because she possesses magical powers, somehow knows the “intent” of every J6 defendant, and is labeling them as “different” and “corrupt,” unlike the gentle souls who protest all things right-wing.

Sure, like these fine, upstanding folks:

Because nothing says “average American protester,” like clubbing innocent people in the head with a pipe because you’re mad about the outcome of an election.

Clearly, Justice Gorsuch wasn’t buying what Ms. Prelogar was selling.

BBC:

On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justices heard two hours of arguments over the law’s interpretation. However, it remained unclear how they would rule.

A lawyer for a man who stormed the Capitol and was prosecuted under the law argued before the Justices that “a host of felony and misdemeanour” crimes already exist to prosecute his client’s actions.

The 2002 law passed in the wake of the Enron accounting scandal, Jeffrey Green said, was not one of them…

https://revolver.news/2024/04/during-j6-arguments-gorsuch-references-kavanaugh-hearing-where-200-insurrectionists-arrested/

>>20747816

2/2

US Solicitor GeneralElizabeth Prelogar counterargued that rioters deliberately attempted “to prevent Congress from certifying the results of the election,” therefore obstructing an official proceeding. (She wasn’t at all convincing)

Both fielded sceptical questions from the Justices.

At one point, Mr Green argued that there is no historical precedent in which the law was used to prosecute demonstrators.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor replied: “We’ve never had a situation before where (there was an attempt) to stop a proceeding violently, so I am not sure what a lack of history proves.”

On the other hand, Ms Prelogar fielded questions from Justice Neil Gorusch on whether the law could then be stretched to apply to a “sit-in that disrupts a trial” or “a heckler” at the State of the Union Address.

“Would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison?” he asked, appearing to reference an incident in which Jamaal Bowman, Democrat House representative, pressed a fire alarm in the Capitol.

Of course, Justice Gorsuch is talking about the Democrat Congressman who tried to stall a vote by pulling a fire alarm and then lied about.

Gorsuch also referenced the Kavanaugh hearings, where 200 frothing females screeched and humped the ground like unshaven banshees over Justice Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court hearing. Apparently, these angelic ladies weren’t trying to “stop” the hearing; maybe it was just their time of the month and they were acting out, or something.

NPR:

It took less than two minutes for the first protester to be ejected from Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s opening day of testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Seconds later, a second demonstrator was thrown out of the hearing room, followed by another, followed by another.

“This is a mockery and a travesty of justice,” yelled one protester this week. “Kavanaugh can’t be trusted,” shouted another. Some protesters wore shirts that read things like “I am what’s at stake.” Others arrived on Capitol Hill dressed as characters from The Handmaid’s Tale, the story of a dystopian future in which women are treated as property of the state.

At least 227 demonstrators were arrested between the start of the nomination hearings on Tuesday and the end of testimony on Friday, according to the U.S. Capitol Police.Most of those charged this week with disorderly conduct, crowding or obstructing paid fines of $35 or $50.

Look, we all know if those were right-wing protesters behaving that way at a Supreme Court hearing, they would’ve been tossed in prison immediately. The US injustice system has been weaponized by the Biden regime. And further to that point, January 6 was such a horrific so-called “insurrection” that not a single defendant has ever been charged with 18 U.S. Code § 2383—rebellion or insurrection. Isn’t that interesting? Let’s hope that when all is said and done, J6 political prisoners will sue the hell out of anyone and everyone who ever called them an “insurrectionist.”

https://revolver.news/2024/04/during-j6-arguments-gorsuch-references-kavanaugh-hearing-where-200-insurrectionists-arrested/

I thought Prelogar was very unconvincing, she kept on saying with Antifa and BLM “she didn’t think the government could victim them, but grandmothers walking and praying in the Capitol can go to jail on this bogus twisting of Justice. She sure got in line quickly with Bidan Admin. Highly educated and now being used as the mafia)

Bannon On European Elites: “They’re All Gonna Give Money And Fight Until The Last Ukrainian Is Dead”

I think was posted yesterday but McCaul, says Johnson is a man if God, he knelt down asked God to tell him the right thing to do. The next morning he got up and he said “he wants to be on the right side of history”, meaning I want to be the most well known speaker so my name is in the books. He’ll be in the books all right, the first or second shortest serving speaker in America’d history.

Than McCaul compares Johnson to Churchill. Man McCaul drinks too much. He should be in a soap opera. No wonder Americans don’t trust Congress or Senate!

7:56

https://rumble.com/embed/v4nm3a5/?pub=4

Col. Harvey: “The Russians Do Not Have The Capacity Or The Desire To Expand The Fight Past Ukraine”

I really like Derick Harvey, he worked for Nunes investigating the Russiahoax with Patel

12:46

https://rumble.com/embed/v4nt809/?pub=4

Steve Bannon On Mike Johnson Promulgating Democrat Rule: “This Is Complete Capitulation”

These people are stupid! Johnson is a traitor

14:59

https://rumble.com/embed/v4nt7pt/?pub=4

E.J. Antoni Explains How The Government Implicitly Taxes You Through Inflation. We are bankrupt already, this is just to stab the body with more knives. Its only to maintain balance until the election to fake everyone out. The hidden taxes with inflation

9:24

https://rumble.com/embed/v4nta7l/?pub=4

Dr. Gina Loudon: How Are The Jurors Supposed To Be Impartial When The Whole System’s Against TrumpStephen A Smith is revealing the progressive strategy that is failing

This is good

14:48

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ntaoh/?pub=4

>>20748194

This is funny, she gives a psychological view of how people are perceiving the lies about Trump. They are actually pushing them to align with Trump

Steve Bannon Applauds Stephen A. Smith For Offering Clear Insight Into Minorities’ Shift To MAGA

4:08

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ntbdi/?pub=4

Giuliani Warns Of NY Jurors Lying About Their Political Affiliation In Order To Join Trump Trial. Two lawyers appointed to the juryUnheard of!

8:50

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ntbwo/?pub=4

BREAKING: Rep. MTG Joins Thomas Massie In Plan To Oust Speaker Johnson For Lack Of Action. How to hell are they gonna hire another republican speaker?Who are they going to put up to put in as speaker.

Did Johnson think that dems wouldn’t sabotage the Republican party.

16:33

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ntce6/?pub=4

>>20748337

Really, I think the death threats are real. But I think McCarthy was always aligned with them. He’s willing to $27 or $72 million to destroy MAGA in congress, and defeat anyone who supoorts Trump.

One day McCarthy will have an ice cream cart again, or be in jail.

A lot if dirty crooked things happen there.

Where is Matt Gaetz, he used to be on media and interviews constantly and he seems to have disappeared? Has anyone seen him lately?

>>20748327

My question if they oust Johnson who will they nominate. Massie won’t be strong enough, they won’t get a majority with Gaetz, besides the fact he’d do a better job. Its never gonna be MTG, I like Biggs, he’s stronger then Johnson, but its a guess if he would do it.

Johnson was never the right choice, he was too weak and vulnerable

I don’t see Jim Jordan being able to handle it, he lets people do things that are stupid.

Is there anyone you can think of?

What do they get threatened with? Hawthorne was right, its all blackmail

>>20748414

Seems like at this point, but they get a lot a power. I think Congress is run like the Mafia and has been for 60 years.

Term limits on both the Congress and Senate, after the 2nd election they are in like flynn, and start going down the crooked path.

If they eliminated lobbyist contact, they may actually do their jobs

>>20748328

It really is, no one thinks about tye psychology of people hearing this injustice. The media thinks the hatred is stronger, but previous wrongs done to them have a big effect

>>20748222

Kek.

So the Trump Curse comes in different gifts? Cool

Pray for Mike, you can tell he’s pretty warn out. Get The Best Deals For The WarRoom Posse At MyPillow Today

I really love and respect Mike Lindell. He never quits

2:23

https://rumble.com/embed/v4ntcd3/?pub=4