Mike Davis 
@mrddmia
Dear Liz Cheney:
Do you support the Trump 47 Justice Department charging:
1. Obama, now-Judge David Barron, and other Obama advisors for capital murder for their extrajudicial drone strike on American citizens, including a minor?
2. Biden and his advisors for his illegal mass-parole of dangerous illegal immigrants into America and their natural and probable resulting crimes?
3. Bush 43, your father, and their advisors for mass-murder and war crimes for reckless (at best) reliance on bad intel to invade Iraq?
That’s what could happen without presidential immunity for official acts.
Where does this end?
This is so much bigger than Trump.
x.com/kyledcheney/status/17822
x.com
Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) on X
JUST IN: Liz CHENEY is out with a NYT op-ed pushing for the Supreme Court to reject Trump’s immunity claim in a way that does not allow him to delay his D.C. trial past the 2024 election.
Apr 22, 2024, 4:56 AM
https://truthsocial.com/@mrddmia/posts/112314038185866162
On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Donald Trump’s arguments that he is immune from prosecution for his efforts to steal the 2020 presidential election. It is likely that all — or nearly all — of the justices agree that a former president who attempted to seize power and remain in office illegally can be prosecuted. I suspect that some justices may also wish to clarify whether doctrines of presidential immunity might apply in other contexts — for example, to a president’s actions as commander in chief during a time of war. But the justices should also recognize the profoundly negative impact they may have if the court does not resolve these issues quickly and decisively.
If delay prevents this Trump case from being tried this year, the public may never hear critical and historic evidence developed before the grand jury, and our system may never hold the man most responsible for Jan. 6 to account.
The Jan. 6 House select committee’s hearings and final report in 2022 relied on testimony given by dozens of Republicans — including many who worked closely with Mr. Trump in the White House, in his Justice Department and on his 2020 presidential campaign. Special counsel Jack Smith’s election-related indictment of Mr. Trump relies on many of the same firsthand witnesses. Although the special counsel reached a number of the same conclusions as the select committee, the indictment is predicated on a separate and independent investigation. Evidence was developed and presented to a grand jury sittin
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/22/opinion/trump-immunity-supreme-court.html