Kek. I'm so tired of these faggots pushing the bullshit narrative that "Biden is calling the shots" (tm). That mother fucker can't even wipe his own ass, but they want to say he's muh "Mastermind" (tm) of the Lawfare against Trump? Give me a fucking break!
>>20760736
>Jews at a BBQ party with God.
"Holocaust" (tm)
>>20760773
>WHO IS IN CONTROL?
Biden's Jewish Cabinet. It's time people stop bullshitting about (((them))).
>That slap-down didn't take long. Letitia James argued her case and the Judge ruled. Whole thing took about an hour.
While I'm loathe to use a sportsball reference, I'll make an exception in this case, as it's interesting she threw her hail mary during the first quarter.
>erbody gettin cheeks clapped around Diddy
I'm more interested in all the mother fuckers that went to these parties, knew about it and did nothing.
>elon is a nigger
Kek. It's interesting that most of us are still banned, but he's got the temerity to harp on muh "Free Speech." Absolute faggot is faggot.
>Did nothing? Why do you think they were there? To 'party' too. Wake up.
Diddy's parties were a litmus test, Moran. Look it up.
>Can lurk but faggot statement stands.
Indeed. I know the play, though. Elon is dependent on the bot farm, 'cos they feed the click bait, which in turn produces more ad revenue for muh "X" (tm). When Trump wins in November, which coincides with Elon's charging to poast scheme, Elon will "finally eradicate the bot problem" (tm) and will release all accounts under a general amnesty, finally freeing people's private information from being illegally held by his company.
We're still a threat to his ecosystem.
>The parties had NDA, open drug use, service, and sex. For decades.
Didn't stop Kappy, did it? They all knew and said nothing. Their lives were more important than the children they were raping. But keep making excuses for them.
>did you know his roommate michelle was promoting ivermectin before c19?
Indeed, I did. Ivermectin is the complete destruction of the Pharma industry, of which, they are completely dependent on.
>Not making excuses.
Except you are. You're literally coughing up all these different ways theycouldn'ttalk about it.
>Rightly stating that all were partaking.
And you canprovethis undeniably? You know for absolute certainty that every party-goer "participated?"
>Participated in criminality or not exposing criminality witnessed, yes all.
Indeed….. I was making reference to (your) comments about the rape and pedophila, but you're right. It's not about that. We need to go after all of them. Doesn't matter if we can prove anything. They're all guilty by association, right?