Kek. Go eat dinner with the fam and spend some time hanging with WifeAnon, only to find there's fuckery afoot?
Kek. They're kvetching about this, but their own religious ideology teaches Jews they're "Chosen" (tm) and the rest of us non-Jews are "mere animals in human form meant to serve" (tm)? Whining about "hate is taught" in schools, but don't pay attention to hate taught from supremacist, religious ideology. Fucking unreal.
>Bernie accusation taking off on X
Isn't the Bernie story crazy? He's been "Independent" (tm) all his career, but he pretty much votes lock-step with Democrats. But they "forced" (tm) Sanders to rape a boy or they'd rape his family and they made his family watch? I'm just making observations, but it's kinda wild that they're trying to run the sympathy angle concerning Sanders, but no one else got that treatment.
> a coward
Kek. This is Bernie Sanders we're talking about. Somehow he avoided the Vietnam draft.
That one made me kek.
>I will never stop anime shitposting.
>It's literally in the constitution.
Kek. Pegasus Ryu Sei Ken!>
>20764442
>there's LITERALLY no mention of anime in the constitution
Um, that would be the First Amendment, Anon. Shitpoasting is free speech.
So lift the veil finally and drop all the censorship, all together? Just make it MO that anything which violates the law is verbum non grata. The rest, no matter how much people do not like it, is fair game?
Solution seems simple.
You forget to login, BO?
>no, didn't forget.
>figure you'd know who replied.
So you're admitting you do not want a free flow of information and that you poast anonymously? Dasting…..
>put out or STFU, attention whore
Kek. She did turn out to be a fender lizard, didn't she?
>I don't really see what faggot shit you're getting at, you're actually retarded.
I know what he's getting at. I can empathize with their opinion. As "BO/BVs," who have the power to delete poasts, it does make one question motives when they also post anonymously.
>Do you need everyone to have a username or some faggot shit like that?
BO/BVs are namefags, regardless. Occam's razor still applies in the situation. As I said, I empathize with the opine. Either way, I do not care. I'll be here until the world ends or the Plan is done.
>my autism
On that end, my fren, I cannot relate. I'm just an analyst thanks to years of abuse as a child. I observe patterns of human behavior. Logically, I see no reason for an Owner or Volunteer to be "logged out," but that's just me and as you said, everyone's entitled to an opinion. It's why I've always respected yours. o7
I'm merely making observations. If they're admitting they poast when not logged it, it does give credence to the thought that they may do so to steer the narrative. I'm not saying it'strue, but it's not like that play isn't one of many from the Playbook.
>nothing to do with logging in or out, just whether or not the name field is filled in
Perhaps they're newfags? They don't read UIDs. Again, I was responding to BO about censorship of notables. I wasn't bitching, or complaining or anything. It was talking about a Baker who didn't like RT articles. Some anons do, some don't. BO offered up their own opine on the matter. I merely suggested to make it MO that everything is on equal ground when it comes to the information war, so long as it wasn't against the law and again the BO said no. I find that surprising, is all. We're here to expose the truth to the world, but some truths are more truthful than others, it seems.