>>20776353 (pb)
If you asked 100 people to wear an anti-dust mask against a deadly flu….
>the technology alone is not bad in itself
>it's just another search engine with a broken ESL language construct around it
???
It's like blockchain.
that's also shitty technology looking for a job.
Of course in theory maybe you could use such a language model to find an exit out of this fake everything rat maze.
>nope
You can feed it literally everything and then compare it all against another. You would be able to figure out truth at some point and then you could rate the whole internet communication based on truth and push that.
>pocket AI
lmao no
>lawyers
Simple laws, tiny government (if any at all) and there goes the lawyer scam
lawyers only exist because of ultra complicated law bullshit bingo, and guess who created that bullshit bingo. Yes, lawyer scum.
See, you would go wonderfulAIlawyers.com, where they "only" take 10% of what a scummy lawyer would take. I say fuck that. There shouldn't be a reason for lawyers to even exist.
Or at least they should be held fully accountable. But instead lawyers lie all the time, police lies all the time, nothing matters. And it's "legal" somehow, which is ridiculous.
But of course when YOU lie during a police interview, then they got YOU by the balls, which makes it even more ridiculous.
They are literally creating more work for themselves.
Also see estate agents.
"I made these few photos, look at this nice home, that will be $500"
Now that's also ridiculous.
>But of course when YOU lie during a police interview,
Lie is defined as intentionally saying something that is incorrect, and that's not even required.
You recall something incorrectly, you think it's true, that would make it not a lie, but it would get called a lie.
Meanwhile a lawyer can write bullshit letters and nothing really matters. Or even lie you in the face.
But in quite a few countries it's illegal to record conversations ("secretly"), which would proof that so many pieces of shits lie. That's why recording it is illegal, because it provides proof for the lies.
Of course police has an exception for that. It's either called wiretapping, or an "interview", where the cop pretends to write things down, but you are actually fully recorded, which is another lie.
>pocket AI, as in you phone or something.
No, that's not gonna happen.
Your shitphone is PHONING home all the time.
The "AI" won't be on your shitphone, but on servers not controlled by you and will record everything (they already do that).
>replaced
again: that's not an actual solution to the actual problem. It's like replacing quacks with AI-quacks, that give you the same pills instead of curing you. That simply gives even less people even more control and nothing actually changes in the end.
>shitphone
No thanks.
>fight against police
word vs word, you lose because le police is le more trustworthy and would have never misremembered things or lied
>the body cam footage is bust
>oh my, but you can't blame the cop, because somehow the footage just doesn't exist
Cop says you started an attack and that's taken as a fact UNLESS YOU CAN PROOF THE OPPOSITE
>they say AI will replace lots of jobs
It's the next lie.
They claimed 20 years ago that le fully automated cars will replace everything, and that hasn't happened.
And they called it autonomous, which means self-driving, in reality the best they can do is make it remote controlled, which is a stupid idea to begin with.
>AI
is a marketing term.
AI either has existed for ages, for example in video games, but in the end it's just programming. The "AI" has no thoughts. It can't actually learn anything. You can't show it a car and make it drive within no time like you can do WITH A CHILD.
Show me an actual AI, that I can give Internet standards documents plus User interface guidelines book and it will create the perfect bug free web browser out of that.
Right now all it can do is copy+paste shitty code from shitty websites and pretend that it would work, but it's not. It's basically a digitized Indian, who can't work for shit.
Or let it make "movies". All you will get is existing content remixed. That's all.
the lies are even obvious.
instead of automating something SIMPLE like train control, or well actually a lawyer or a doctor, no, they go for taxi drivers.
Car driving is the most chaos out there.
Computers hate chaos, they can't handle chaos.
For example take even the stupid idea to replace taxi drivers.
Ok, now your customer has a heart attack.
What will the AI do?
First aid?
lmao, no.
In the best case scenario the "AI" will figure out that it should drive to the nearest "AI" hospital.
But a human taxi driver would have first aid knowledge, because they are required to.
Or let's say a police man is on a street, telling drivers that there was a chemical accident, and that they have to avoid this street.
Now your totally automated taxi has to not only recognize that it's an actual police officer, but even understand what he's saying, like a human can. Good luck with that.
That's how stupid these lies are.
you get what you accept.
for example hospitals that are dispensing pills based on fucking shitty written software ("AI").
Now good luck with that.
>can get hacked, a nurse doing that job can't get hacked, sure in theory the computer could do a better job WHEN EVERYTHING IS PERFECT, but that's never the case
>someone made an error, now instead of 1 nurse fucking up 1 thing, one pharmacist fuck up causes 1000 fuck ups, and potentially 10 dead people
>can be simply broken software
>input error
>bit flip or damaged memory
etc. etc.
>we don't know
I see that these corporations like Google can't even get a web browser properly working.
That's simple compared to remote controlled cars and a shitty web browser won't endanger lives of people.