>>20787390 (pb)
>anon-shill claimed that it was "well - known"
The post you linked to doesn't do that.
Are you retarded and now doubling down?
In fact the post that you linked to was a response to 2 posts not answering a simple question - is there a video with kav and the "woman". So I guess that's a "no" then.
>Which is false
What you write is factually incorrect and anyone can check that that what you claim happened hasn't happened.
>Dude even claimed the Board has gotten more slow and stupid
Maybe you are new here and can't even figure out that there are more than 1 person posting.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt.
Still taking this as another, actually the 4th "no, there is no video with both of them", which is quite surprising.
>fuck off
I was calling out your misinformation, but gave you the benefit of the doubt.
Now you are doubling down even further.
Imagine being triggered that much by a question, then making shit up in your head. Who is supposed to trust what you say, when you can't even read posts on here correctly, and when you get told that you can't, you attack the one trying to help you out.
>why care
Good question regarding your posts.
Anon asks question.
>reply to it, screaming, but don't answer question
1 or 2 threads later
>reply to it once more, screaming even further and kicking, don't answer the qiuestion either, but now making shit up and calling anon a shill based on made-up nonsense and shit.
1 thread later
>reply to it once more, making even more shit up
You seem obsessed, but also not in reality.
Go back to the thread and re-read it carefully.
After that come back here and tell me that you are sorry.
>sauce for non existing video
>give me sauce that Santa doesn't exist
Are you a leftie?
Also shouldn't that be a peer-reviewed sauce, just to make sure it's "accurate"?
You flipping out because of a question being asked and making tons of shit up and attacking anyone who calls you out, while not answering the simple question, is saying a lot.