Anonymous ID: fe5f49 July 8, 2018, 8:03 a.m. No.2080328   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0342 >>0348 >>0382 >>0404 >>0448

>>2079795

Don't understand how this is still up for debate. They are different photos.

ABC Stock Photo:

10 Folds on the curtain fully visible, 11-16+ obstructed by chair

Q Photo:

11 Folds on the curtain fully visible, the rest partially obstructed by a chair at a different angle

 

They kept trying to disprove the selfie using different stock photos from news stories, and still failed on that one. They've stuck to their guns on this one, though, and it doesn't make sense.

Anonymous ID: fe5f49 July 8, 2018, 8:08 a.m. No.2080357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0365

>>2080342

>>2080348

Question:

 

Seems like things are back to "Pre-Thursday Night" with BO/BV/Bakers. What in the ever living fuck happened to the board? It seems like it was being ran by shills for a couple of days with people's IP Hashes getting exposed, etc.

Anonymous ID: fe5f49 July 8, 2018, 8:19 a.m. No.2080430   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0453

>>2080403

>>2080059

There is no try, only do.

 

>>1822612

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1822262.html#1822612

 

Your photo is an edit of an edit. You're doing the same thing that everyone else does when they run out of arguments; just attack the source. "Q's uploaded photo is a farce, so there ya have it; debunked".