Kash Patel
@Kash
Judge Cannon unseals DOJ docs that Jack Smiths band of miscreants redacted, showing Bidens GSA possessed boxes of 45s papers before they shipped them to MaL.
Translation: #GovernmentGangsters possessed ‘classified’ docs, shipped them to 45, then charged him, because they became illegal in transit? Another DOJ/FBI rig job, just like Russia Gate
Congress- where are the flipping subpoenas
Apr 30, 2024, 1:01 AM
https://truthsocial.com/@Kash/posts/112358412351935750
Kevin Sitton (22LR/NATO)
@dweebyee
4h
Replying to @Kash
Just so we’re clear: This is like the DEA ringing your door bell, handing you a kilo of coke, then slamming you against the wall, charging you with possession with intent to distribute.

here2help1
@here2help1
4h
Replying to @Kash
CAUGHT AGAIN!!!! WHEN IS THERE GOING TO BE CONSEQUENCES FOR ALL THIS TREASON TAKING PLACE?????????


Kevin Sitton (22LR/NATO)
@dweebyee
3h
Replying to @Kash
What’s REALLY outrageous is that those bastards were trying to obstruct, obfuscate and hide exculpatory information like this from the court, the public, and from trial.
=
Judge Cannon should call for the disbarment of the entire prosecutorial team.

idpatriot64
@idpatriot64
4h
Replying to @Kash
The so called Republicans aren't going to do jack shit. They're in on it. They want Trump out so they can continue to get their share of the grift.

Fairysweet
@Fairysweet
4h
Replying to @Kash
Our entire government is corrupt and infiltrated.

patriotsmatter
@patriotsmatter
4h
Replying to @Kash
Like I’ve said many times before, it’s a crime syndicate not a government. Folks better wake up to what they’re dealing with.
Patriot_Peach_Forever
@Patriot_Peach_Forever
4h
Replying to @Kash
Where is our Congress? It's as if we don't have one, except when they want to notify us they are stealing more money.

Diana Wray
@seaglassshore
4h
Replying to @Kash
Congress is so busy defending other countries, they don’t have time for the American people. A disgrace…..
Notable
Nayib Bukele is not an economic genius like Javier Milei, good start or cover up?
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Wow! It looks like Deranged Jack Smith, a sick PSYCHO, got caught. BIG “STUFF!” See story in Rob Schmitt opening on NEWSMAX. AMAZING — MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Apr 29, 2024, 11:49 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112358128694176117
1149
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 04/15/2018 20:03:34 ID: bbec14
8chan/qresearch: 1056025
Anonymous 04/15/2018 20:00:16 ID:9961bd
8chan/qresearch: 1055967
Image Name: LynchTarmacICanHaz2.jpg
Filename: 1a97cffc9cbca5f8454077559f0d72e435a4d1b9ace4265a8fe0bc165ed0745a.jpg
Image Name: LynchTarmacICanHaz.jpg
Filename: 9f4208dfa2e44ada7bc33d882fbd79ce97c4a7ddc1e25a3436ce3b6b61202c09.jpg
Image Name: LynchTarmac2.jpg
Filename: ee98e58bd8fbac1a33fc32421ba28669b2af11b557e00d0525403f91fc4c4e07.jpg
Image Name: LynchMuhSCOTUS1.jpg
Filename: 7683cc3528fa74ac24f86b63d8b23b2f6fe0cb8d901ec3df1fafcec18e6e9259.jpg
Image Name: LynchButYouPromised1.jpg
Filename: 9f2d392e1a191276ffc04c2e6558c9b397d14281a96a9b417078cd198c6826f2.jpg
>>1055924
We thought it was Scalia.
Thanks for spelling it out – Ruth Bader Ginsberg. I need to fix Muh SCOTUS meme.
>>1055967
Think timing.
LL remains AG HRC.
HRC appoints new AS replacement.
RBG steps down.
LL steps up.
New AG.
‘The Plan’.
Q
i find your knowledgeable post helpful
tyvm
i want to know what jack smith's real name is
that was never solved
Paul Sperry/ @paulsperry_ 04/26/2024 13:28:25
ID: Twitter Web App
Twitter: 1783911021154873754
NEW: FEC and state records reveal Matt Colangelo NY DA Bragg's lead prosecutor presenting case against Trump to jurors gave $400 to Obama, $150 to Democrat Dave Min and $150 to Democrat Steven Dettelbach. Colangelo previously served as deputy assistant to President Obama
BREAKING: AttorneyMatt ColangeloIs the Link Between Soros Backed DA Bragg’s Office and the Obama White House and the Biden DOJ
by Joe Hoft Apr. 3, 2023 1:35 pm
We knew Soros-backed Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg wasn’t smart enough to put the bogus Trump indictment together himself, but he was dumb enough and corrupt enough to follow through with it.
The real culprit behind the “get Trump” radicals in New York is the corrupt, newly hired, former Obama-Biden DOJ attorney named Matt Colangelo.
Attorney Mike Davis unloaded Colangelo’s name along with Steve Bannon on the War Room today.
In their interview, Davis noted that Matt Colangelo is the link between the Biden DOJ and DA Bragg in their corrupt acts in targeting and putting together a BS indictment against President Trump. This guy was in the Obama White House and the Biden DOJ and appears to have been brought in to indict President Trump on whatever he could come up with.
This is a great example of how Obama destroyed the US DOJ and made it anti-American, biased, and corrupt.
Davis and Bannon dissected the corrupt actor pushing anti-American full woke actions in the corrupt DOJ now working with Bragg, Colangelo.
Colangelo was one of the first corrupt actors brought into Biden’s DOJ in a top position. This is the guy who acted with others to indict the likes of Americans who were praying outside of abortion clinics.
Only a few months ago, the former Obama DOJ radical was hired by DA Bragg in New York.
This radical is who’s behind indicting President Trump and he’s totally connected to Obama and Biden.
It’s all just a political hit job by the American Trump haters in the Obama-Biden Administrations. These people hate America. Obama called for change but his change was the total destruction of America, economically, internationally, and morally.
Mike Davis shared more on how Bragg’s phony legal theory exposes The Clear Political Hit-Job On President Trump.
Obama wanted to change America by destroying all that was good in this country. Indicting Trump has been his dream ever since citizen Trump challenged Obama’s birth certificate.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/breaking-corrupt-and-woke-attorney-matt-colangelo-obama-and-biden-lackey-hired-by-ny-da-bragg/
Paul Sperry / @paulsperry_
04/26/2024 12:11:07
Twitter: 1783891565934457143
Mike Davis / @mrddmia
04/02/2023 14:33:19
Twitter: 1642596085049827328
Prior Manhattan DA, US Attorney, FEC, and Bragg declined to prosecute Trump for settling nuisance claim in 2016
Disgruntled, unethical prosecutors resign—and run to media
Bragg hires Obama-Biden political operative
Witch Hunt
Indictment https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/31/nyregion/alvin-bragg-trump-investigation.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
Mike Davis / @mrddmia
04/02/2023 14:47:41
Twitter: 1642599699713757184
In December, Soros-backed Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg hiredMatt Colangeloto revive the “zombie case” against Trump.
The media portrayed Matt as a “former senior DOJ and NY AG official.”
Failed to mention?
Matt was a political appointee for both Obama and Biden Administrations. https://t.co/sgmy71DtMP
Mike Davis / @mrddmia
04/02/2023 14:49:05
Twitter: 1642600054979698690
https://www.justice.gov/archives/asg/staff-profile/former-acting-associate-attorney-general-matthew-colangelo
Mike Davis / @mrddmia
04/02/2023 17:15:19
Twitter: 1642636852510457856
Who is Matthew Colangelo?
When Bragg appointed Colangelo in December, CNN simply reported he was "a senior official in the US Justice Department and before that served as an attorney on the Trump Foundation investigation with the New York attorney general’s office."
But CNN failed to report Colangelo is a lifelong leftwing activist (including NAACP lawyer for 7 years) and senior Democrat political appointee for nearly 15 years:
currently appointed to made-up position in Soros-backed Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's office (to get Trump; first indictment ever of a former president; bogus, trumped-up charges previously declined by prior Manhattan DA, US Attorney, FEC, and Bragg himself)
acting #3 in Biden Justice Department (then as #2 to radical #3 Vanita Gupta, when Biden and Garland appointed her; leader in politicizing and weaponizing Biden DOJ, including prosecuting Christians praying outside of abortion clinics while giving amnesty to abortion-industry activists terrorizing Catholic Churches, crisis-pregnancy centers, and Supreme Court justices and families in homes)
senior lawyer for disgraced Democrat New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (including his Executive Deputy Attorney General for Social Justice) (to get Trump) (Bragg served as chief deputy attorney general when Colangelo brought dozens of lawsuits against Trump administration and led investigations into Trump Foundation and Trump's finances)
senior White House economic advisor to President Obama
top aide to Obama Labor Secretary (and future DNC chair) Tom Perez
top lawyer to Obama DOJ Civil Rights Division head Tom Perez
Colangelo has never served as a line prosecutor or defense attorney.
Colangelo has never served as a line prosecutor or defense attorney.
Colangelo has never served as a line prosecutor or defense attorney.
Colangelo has never served as a line prosecutor or defense attorney.
Colangelo has never served as a line prosecutor or defense attorney.
He is simply a senior Democrat operative, brought in by Bragg to get Trump.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/05/politics/matthew-colangelo-manhattan-white-collar-investigations/index.html
Paul Sperry reposted…
looks like a nasty spook that is now mind controlled
good lord protect don jr
Paul Sperry/ @paulsperry_ 04/26/2024 21:49:22
ID: Twitter Web App
Twitter: 1784037088993677434
NEW YORK POST Editorial Board:Trump Impeachment 'Whistleblower' Eric Ciaramella Is A Venal Biden Hack, No Democracy Defender
https://nypost.com/2024/04/20/opinion/eric-ciaramella-a-venal-biden-hack-is-no-democracy-defender/
Scratch a ‘defender of democracy’ like Eric Ciaramella — he’s a venal Biden hack
Remember Eric Ciaramella, the intelligence community lackey generally credited with sparking off the first Trump impeachment frenzy?
He’s widely ID’d as the anonymous accuser who in 2019 claimed the then-prez had made Ukraine military aid conditional on an investigation of Biden family corruption in the country.
Yet when Joe Biden did exactly that — threatened to axe Ukraine aid over a political demand — Ciaramella didn’t do a thing, as Paul Sperry reports at RealClearInvestigations.
Oh, sorry: He did say “Yikes” in an email about Joe’s abrupt 2015 crusade to choke off the aid spigot unless the former Soviet-bloc nation fired top prosecutor Victor Shokin.
Shokin just happened to be investigating energy firm Burisma, where First Son Hunter had a hugely lucrative gig on the board — and had been identified as a key target by Hunter’s shady business associates.
That definitely merits a yikes. Possibly an oof.
Maybe even a WTF.
Hmmmm: What about a tipoff to a reporter or to Congress?
That would make sense, if Ciaramella were a selfless, fearless public servant.
Surely this was the very definition of a public-interest story on which the whistle needed blowing loud and clear.
Except that when Eric felt moved to do his bit to save America from the greatest threat it’s ever known, that threat was Democrats losing elections.
Given the vast network of Biden Mafia members who benefited from Hunter’s foreign dealings and the ever-increasing tide of evidence damning him, Uncle Jim and “big guy” Joe himself, the pretense that it was innocent is becoming impossible to sustain.
Yet as far as the available records show, Ciaramella — with the face of a Reddit moderator and the spine of a jellyfish — did nothing much after his impotent “yikes.”
Or at least nothing of any value to the American people, i.e. the group whose interests he was supposed to be serving.
He did work with the Biden flunkeys trying to do damage control over amply deserved bad press from Hunter’s crooked Burisma job.
And Barack Obama’s former Ukraine Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt sounded dubious in closed-door 2020 testimony before Congress that Ciaramella actually was surprised by the news about Shokin.
That allegation makes sense, given that Ciaramella seems to have served as Biden’s main consigliere on Ukrainian affairs.
Paul Sperry/ @paulsperry_ 04/26/2024 21:57:29
ID: Twitter Web App
Twitter: 1784039133028966797
NEW YORK POST Editorial Board:
"Yet when Joe Biden did exactly that — threatened to ax Ukraine aid over a political demand — Ciaramella didn’t do a thing, as Paul Sperry reports at RealClearInvestigations"
https://nypost.com/2024/04/20/opinion/eric-ciaramella-a-venal-biden-hack-is-no-democracy-defender/
Paul Sperry/ @paulsperry_ 04/25/2024 12:15:15
ID: Twitter Web App
Twitter: 1783530220160430312
DEVELOPING:RealClearInvestigations found at least 160 instances where Trump impeachment "whistleblower" Ciaramella shows up in Biden's OVP emails. They reveal his role advising Biden intersects w/ the Biden impeachment inquiry incl the $1 bil quid pro quo
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2024/04/17/impeachment_whistleblower_was_in_the_loop_of_biden-ukraine_affairs_that_trump_wanted_probed_1024937.html
Impeachment ‘Whistleblower’ Was in the Loop of Biden-Ukraine Affairs That Trump Wanted Probed
Above, Vice President Biden meets ex-Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk at the White House in June 2016 as his Ukraine adviser Eric Ciaramella (right) looks on.
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
April 17, 2024
The ‘whistleblower’ who sparked Donald Trump’s first impeachment was deeply involved in the political maneuverings behind Biden-family business schemes in Ukraine that Trump wanted probed, newly obtained emails from former Vice President Joe Biden’s office reveal.
In 2019, then-National Intelligence Council analyst Eric Ciaramella touched off a political firestorm when he anonymously accused Trump of linking military aid for Ukraine to a demand for an investigation into alleged Biden corruption in that country.
But four years earlier, while working as a national security analyst attached to then-Vice President Joe Biden’s office, Ciaramella was a close adviser when Biden threatened to cut off U.S. aid to Ukraine unless it fired its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. At the time, the corruption-riddled energy giant was paying Biden’s son Hunter millions of dollars.
Those payments – along with other evidence tying Joe Biden to his family’s business dealings – received little attention in 2019 as Ciaramella accused Trump of a corrupt quid pro quo. Neither did subsequent evidence indicating that Hunter Biden’s associates had identified Shokin as a “key target.” These matters are now part of the House impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
“It now seems there was material evidence that would have been used at the impeachment trial [to exonerate Trump],” said George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who has testified as an expert witness in the ongoing Biden impeachment inquiry. “Trump was alleging there was a conflict of interest with the Bidens, and the evidence could have challenged Biden’s account and established his son’s interest in the Shokin firing.”
Ciaramella’s role – including high-level discussions with top Biden aides and Ukrainian prosecutors – is only now coming to light thanks to the recent release of White House emails and photos from the National Archives.
The emails show Ciaramella expressed shock – “Yikes” is what he wrote – at Biden’s move to withhold the $1 billion in aid from Kyiv, which represented a sudden shift in U.S. policy. They also show he was drawn into White House communications over how to control adverse publicity from Hunter taking a lucrative seat on Burisma’s board.
Yet there is no evidence Ciaramella raised alarms about the questionable Biden business activities he witnessed firsthand, which is in sharp contrast to 2019. In that instance, he was galvanized into action after being told by White House colleague Alexander Vindman of an “improper” phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. During the call, Trump solicited Zelensky’s help in investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden’s role in the company.
Some former congressional investigators say Ciaramella effectively helped cover up a scandal far worse than what Trump was impeached over. What’s more, he failed to disclose that he had a potential conflict of interest stemming from his connection to the matter Trump asked Zelensky to probe when he lodged his complaint against Trump. RealClearInvestigations was the first to identify the then-33-year-old Ciaramella as the anonymous impeachment “whistleblower,” something major media continue to keep under tight wraps.
Ciaramella worked under CIA Director John Brennan when President Obama made Biden his point man on Ukraine in 2014, the same year Burisma hired Hunter. The next year, the CIA detailed Ciaramella, a longtime advocate for aid to Ukraine, to the White House, where he worked closely with Biden and his staff as a top adviser on key Ukrainian policies. After Biden left office, he stayed on at the GOP White House until mid-2017 even though he’s a Democrat, working as a Ukrainian and Russian analyst on Trump’s National Security Council. Co-workers there accused him of trying to sabotage Trump, including allegedly leaking sensitive information to the press.
Above in the foreground, an unidentified, bespectacled aide resembling Eric Ciaramella aboard Air Force Two during Vice President Biden's Dec. 6, 2015 flight to Kiev. This was the trip when Biden threatened to withhold military aid if Burisma prosecutor Viktor Shokin were not fired, which he soon was. The White House identified those in the cabin with Biden as Ukraine energy adviser Amos Hochstein, standing; and, seated, Carlyn Reichel, Kate Bedingfield, and Elissa Slotkin.
Vice President Joseph R. Biden Archives
RealClearInvestigations has reviewed more than 2,000 pages of newly disclosed archived emails from the former vice president’s office related to Ukraine, of which more than 160 contained references to Ciaramella. They reveal that his role advising Biden’s office potentially intersects with the current impeachment inquiry in several areas. Chiefly, Ciaramella focused on aid to Ukraine and anti-corruption reforms in the country. In that capacity, he:
Hosted, cleared into the White House, and met face-to-face there with senior Ukrainian prosecutors.
Gave a “readout” of the meeting to his superiors, who in turn pushed for Shokin’s firing.
Traveled with Biden to Kyiv during the 2015 trip during which Biden demanded Shokin’s firing.
Wrote media “talking points” for Ukrainian officials.
Huddled with the top Biden officials involved in discussions concerning the $1 billion aid package and Shokin, including: Amos Hochstein; Victoria Nuland; Geoffrey Pyatt; Bridget Brink; and Michael Carpenter.
Corresponded with Biden officials coordinating responses to negative media reports about Hunter’s cushy and controversial Burisma job.
“Point of contact”: Eric Ciaramella taking notes next to Biden's security adviser Michael Carpenter (right) in a June 2015 meeting with Ukrainian officials at the White House.
Ukraine.com
Former Obama-Biden administration officials have confirmed in recent closed-door congressional testimony that Ciaramella was a key part of Biden’s process for making policy in Ukraine. In 2016, for instance, a White House photo shows him taking notes at a White House meeting Biden held with then-Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk to discuss Ukraine’s anti-corruption reforms and other issues.
Ciaramella also worked directly with top Obama and Biden administration diplomats on Ukraine, including senior State Department official Victoria Nuland. “Eric was regularly the clearing authority to get me into the White House for interagency meetings on Ukraine,” Nuland revealed in a 2020 Senate deposition. Asked if she ever discussed Ukraine policy and Shokin with Ciaramella, Nuland testified: “Of course, I did. He was part of the interagency process. He was also on my negotiating team for the six, seven rounds of negotiations I did with the Russians on [the disputed Ukraine region] Donbas.”
Ciaramella was directly involved in talks concerning the massive U.S. aid package to Ukraine that Biden conditioned on the removal of Shokin, who at the time had seized the assets of the corrupt Burisma oligarch employing Hunter Biden. He also arranged and participated in White House talks with Ukrainian prosecutors visiting from Shokin’s office.
White House visitor logs confirm Ciaramella escorted Shokin’s deputy prosecutor, David Sakvarelidze, into the White House for a January 2016 meeting. A White House agenda for the meeting lists Ciaramella as “point of contact” for the Ukrainian delegation. He also checked in Andriy Telizhenko, the Ukrainian Embassy official who says they discussed Burisma and Hunter Biden during the meeting and struggled to understand why his U.S. counterparts were suddenly hostile to Shokin after praising him in earlier talks.
Emails from the time show Ciaramella appeared surprised to hear about the linkage between the $1 billion loan to Ukraine and the dismissal of Shokin. Though Biden maintains he insisted Kyiv oust Shokin because he was too soft on weeding out fraud in entities that included Burisma, Ciaramella suggested he didn’t share the view that Shokin was corrupt. “We were super impressed with the group,” Ciaramella added, “and we had a two-hour discussion of their priorities and the obstacles they face.”
U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs/Finance Committe
"Yikes": In an email, Ciaramella expresses shock at the quid pro quo to oust the Ukrainian prosecutor.
U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs/Committee on Finance, Page 134
On Jan. 21, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt emailed Ciaramella and other White House aides an article from the Ukrainian press – “U.S. loan guarantee conditional on Shokin’s dismissal.”
“Yikes. I don’t recall this coming up in our meeting with them,” Ciaramella replied, referring to the White House meeting he hosted with top Ukrainian prosecutors.
But in a closed-door 2020 deposition before the Senate, Pyatt sounded skeptical that Ciaramella was in the dark about the decision. “I think you have to ask Eric what he meant by ‘Yikes,’” Pyatt told Senate investigators. He said that he believed conditioning the loan guarantee on Shokin’s removal “obviously came up in those meetings” hosted by Ciaramella, suggesting that Biden’s aide knew of the quid pro quo before Pyatt circulated the article about it from the Ukrainian press.
The day before he hosted the Ukraine prosecutors, Ciaramella received an agenda from a State Department official that asked him to “note the importance of appointing a new PG [Prosecutor General], reiterating that Shokin is an obstacle to reform,” according to emails. The agenda also called on Ciaramella to “ask the del [Ukrainian delegation] what high-level cases are on the docket for prosecution,” which raises suspicions in some quarters that Biden’s advisers were fishing for information about Shokin’s plans for prosecuting Burisma oligarchs, something Hunter Biden had been asked to find out.
In a Jan. 21 email, Pyatt told Ciaramella to “buckle in” because, as he later explained to Senate investigators, the deal was a “difficult issue” and “there was going to be political controversy around this [news].”
The former ambassador demurred when asked if conditioning the $1 billion on Shokin’s firing was Biden’s idea or came from his office. “It was the – our interagency policy,” he testified, adding, “I don’t remember when the vice president would have weighed in on this.”
However, Pyatt allowed that it was a sudden change in policy. “At the beginning,” he said, “it was not our expectation that Shokin’s removal would be necessary.” Indeed, an Oct. 1, 2015, memo summarizing the recommendation of the Interagency Policy Committee on Ukraine stated, “Ukraine has made sufficient progress on its [anti-corruption] reform agenda to justify a third [loan] guarantee.” Ciaramella was a member of the IPC task force, which monitored Shokin’s office. The next month, moreover, the task force drafted a loan guarantee agreement that did not call for Shokin’s removal. Then, in December, Joe Biden flew to Kyiv to demand his ouster.
If what Ciaramella expressed in his email (which he knew would be part of archived White House records) was a genuine reaction, it appears that Vice President Biden went against the recommendation of one of his top NSC advisers on Ukraine. If Ciaramella were genuinely alarmed, he might have blown the whistle on his boss like he did on Trump, but he stayed mum. If, on the other hand, Ciaramella were a party to the quid-pro-quo discussions, as Pyatt suggests, then he had “a direct conflict,” noted Derek Harvey, the former congressional investigator involved in the first impeachment. Either way, Ciaramella clearly found himself in the middle of a major controversy.
Just weeks prior, White House photos indicate that Ciaramella traveled with Biden on the same December 2015 Air Force Two flight the vice president took to Kyiv to threaten Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to ax Shokin. Republicans have accused Biden of pushing Shokin’s ouster to block scrutiny of his son’s actions.
“Biden called an audible and changed U.S. policy toward Ukraine to benefit his son on the plane ride to Ukraine,” House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer said, and “later bragged about withholding a U.S. loan guarantee if Ukraine did not fire the prosecutor [Shokin].”
Biden and his supporters have repeatedly claimed Shokin had to go because he wasn’t cracking down on corruption and that everyone else in the administration, as well as Europe, agreed Shokin should be fired. This remains the prevailing narrative in major U.S. media. But around that time, Shokin had conducted a raid of Burisma oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky’s home, seizing his house, cars, and other assets.
IRS Special Agent Joseph Ziegler, who examined Hunter’s emails as part of his investigation of Hunter for tax evasion, said Shokin was identified as a “key target” in emails exchanged between Hunter and Burisma officials in November 2015 – the month before Biden traveled to Ukraine to demand Shokin’s removal. Just days before Biden arrived in Kyiv in early December 2015 to demand Shokin’s ouster, Hunter allegedly called his father from Dubai following a meeting there with Burisma official Vadym Pozharskyi, who asked him to pressure his father to shut down Shokin’s investigation. Vice President Biden was familiar with Pozharskyi, having met with him in April 2015 during a dinner at the Cafe Milano in D.C. arranged by Hunter.
“The unstated goal was to have the Ukrainian prosecutor removed in an effort to close the criminal case against [Burisma founder] Zlochevsky,” Ziegler said in recent testimony before the House impeachment inquiry. After Shokin was pushed out of office, the Burisma investigation dried up.
Ciaramella tried to marshal a defense for Biden in the whistleblower complaint he sent to Rep. Adam Schiff in August 2019. He listed among Trump’s concerns at the time of the fateful July phone call “that former Vice President Biden had pressured Poroshenko in 2016 to fire Shokin in order to quash a purported criminal probe into Burisma Holdings.” But Ciaramella attempted to pour cold water on the notion by referencing a Bloomberg News article that quoted a “former senior Ukrainian prosecutor” who falsely claimed “that Mr. Shokin in fact was not investigating Burisma at the time of his removal in 2016.”
White House emails reveal that Ciaramella was looped into messages sent by Biden’s communications team, who were concerned that Hunter Biden taking a position on corrupt Burisma’s board created unseemly optics and undercut their boss’ mission to clean up corruption in Ukraine.
In a Dec. 8, 2015, email, for example, Biden’s communications director Kate Bedingfield copied Ciaramella on a link to a New York Times article headlined, “The Knotty Ties Between Joe Biden, His Son and Ukraine.” Bedingfield is quoted in the story, authored by James Risen, denying Hunter had traveled with his father to Ukraine in an attempt to downplay his influence. She also said Ukrainian officials never raised his position on the Burisma board with Biden as an issue of concern. Risen got spun, however, on the issue of compensation for Hunter, reporting that it was “not out of the ordinary.”
At the time, Burisma was paying Hunter, who had no energy sector experience, $1 million a year just for lending his name to its board. It turns out that Hunter never traveled to Ukraine for a single meeting in the five years he sat on Burisma’s board. Republicans suspect Biden got the prosecutor ousted to keep the money flowing from Burisma to the Biden family.
Career State Department officials led by George Kent, who was stationed in Ukraine at the time, tried to get Biden’s aides to raise the issue of potential family conflicts with the vice president. Despite their concerns, Biden never asked his son to step down from the Burisma board, which would have made all questions go away. And despite Kent and other officials identifying Burisma founder Zlochevsky by name as a corrupt actor in Ukraine, Biden himself never publicly called Zlochevsky out as corrupt while Hunter served on his board and pocketed millions in payments from him. For all his talk of fighting corruption in Ukraine, Biden failed to distance himself from one of the most corrupt oligarchs in the country.
Harvey, who served as the staff investigator for the Republican side of the House Intelligence Committee during the 2019 Trump impeachment hearings, said: “The [Biden] impeachment inquiry should compel Ciaramella to testify since we now know he was involved in communications about Biden using the $1 billion in aid to extort Ukraine into firing Shokin.”
Harvey said Ciaramella would make a valuable material witness against Biden in the probe, which centers on whether Biden used his White House clout or political influence on behalf of his son’s foreign paymasters. White House photos indicate Ciaramella took notes during his meetings with Biden, his staff, and Ukrainian officials – materials that lawmakers could subpoena along with his testimony.
Another former staff investigator noted that Ciaramella is no longer protected by federal whistleblower laws. He has left the government and now works as a senior fellow focusing on Ukraine and Russia for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, where he is consulting with White House officials and pushing for billions more in U.S. aid for Ukraine – including “a Marshall Plan for the Ukrainian military.” Through a spokesperson, Ciaramella declined to comment.
“None of the whistleblower protections apply to this particular situation,” said Jason Foster, former chief investigative counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee and a whistleblower expert. He also noted that the Whistleblower Protection Act doesn’t shield whistleblowers from any other conduct they might have been involved in, including their own conduct. Nor does it give them a legal right to anonymity.
A spokeswoman for the House Oversight Committee, which is leading the Biden impeachment inquiry, declined to say whether Ciaramella is on the witness list. “I don’t have anything for you on this at this time,” said House Oversight Communications Director Jessica Collins. However, Comer has publicly described the “whistleblower” impeachment of Trump as a “cover-up” operation for the alleged Biden blackmail scheme in Ukraine involving U.S. aid and the Burisma corruption probe.
What Ciaramella witnessed and what he documented in notes he took during high-level Biden-Ukraine meetings could now be relevant to the active impeachment inquiry of President Biden. The House may have little choice but to hold the kind of hearings the Democrats blocked during the earlier impeachment by keeping Ciaramella’s identity – and his own potential conflict – secret.
As the catalyst for Trump’s impeachment, Ciaramella could now be a reluctant witness for Biden’s.
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2024/04/17/impeachment_whistleblower_was_in_the_loop_of_biden-ukraine_affairs_that_trump_wanted_probed_1024937.html
Paul Sperry/ @paulsperry_ 04/25/2024 12:22:25
ID: Twitter Web App
Twitter: 1783532021513322498
NEW: In a closed-door deposition, US Amb. to Ukraine Pyatt suggested Ciaramella faked surprise at Biden holding back aid to Ukraine to help his son, when he replied "Yikes" in a 2016 email, and that Ciaramella was in the loop on the scheme the entire time
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2024/04/17/impeachment_whistleblower_was_in_the_loop_of_biden-ukraine_affairs_that_trump_wanted_probed_1024937.html
nah, he belong to one of those shadowy groups
unacknowledged special access project USAP's
Sen. Chuck Grassley: “At the center of the [Ukraine foreign influence] plan was Alexandra Chalupa.”
Paul Sperry/ @paulsperry_ 04/26/2024 11:56:10
ID: Twitter Web App
Twitter: 1783887805879341541
FLASHBACK: FEC Found DNC, Hillary Operative Broke Campaign Finance Rules Coordinating 2016 Election Interference Op Against Trump with Ukraine, Then Reversed Its Finding after Jan. 6
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2022/03/10/election_overseer_found_dnc_chalupa_broke_rules_over_ukraine_then_reversed_its_finding_after_jan_6_820892.html
Election Overseer Found DNC, Chalupa Broke Rules Over Ukraine, Then Reversed Its Finding After Jan. 6
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
March 10, 2022
Though ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was never charged with conspiring with Russia, he did go to jail for, among other things, failing to register as a foreign agent for Ukraine. The Democratic National Committee operative who helped get him booted from the campaign should be investigated for the same violation, Republican Senators say.
Former DNC contractor and opposition researcher Alexandra “Ali” Chalupa not only worked closely with the Ukrainian Embassy and Clinton campaign, trading dirt on Manafort and Trump, but also Congress and the Obama White House, State Department and even the FBI. “At the center of the [Ukraine foreign influence] plan was Alexandra Chalupa,” GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley of the Senate Judiciary Committee has asserted.
“Chalupa’s actions appear to show she was simultaneously working on behalf of a foreign government, Ukraine, and on behalf of the DNC and Clinton campaign, in an effort to influence not only the U.S. voting population but U.S. government officials,” Grassley said in a July 2017 letter to then-deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.
“Chalupa’s actions implicate the Foreign Agents Registration Act,” he said. “It is imperative that the Justice Department explain why she has not been required to register under FARA.”
Chalupa maintained Justice looked into the complaint and cleared her within four months, finding no FARA violations. (Rosenstein at the time had just appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller to take over the Russiagate probe after reportedly considering invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office.)
Chalupa is an important figure in the anti-Trump conspiracy plot Special Counsel John Durham is investigating, according to sources familiar with his probe. Though she is a material witness in his inquiry, it is not immediately known if she has been interviewed by his investigators. Questions sent to her attorney went unanswered.
Questions are also being raised about how the Federal Election Commission handled her case in an investigation the agency quietly conducted from 2017, when it first received a complaint about her, until it closed it in 2021.
In a little-noticed 2019 letter to Chalupa, the FEC stated that its attorneys “found reason to believe that you violated [the Federal Election Campaign Act] by soliciting, accepting or receiving contributions from foreign nationals,” noting that “the Ukrainian Embassy made in-kind contributions to the DNC by performing opposition research on the Trump campaign at no charge to the DNC.”
In a separate letter to the DNC, the commission found that the Democratic organization “does not directly deny that Chalupa obtained assistance from the Ukrainians nor that she passed on the Ukrainian Embassy’s research to DNC officials.” Further, it stated that DNC officials “may have authorized Chalupa to act as an intermediary [with the Embassy] to solicit and receive negative information about the Trump campaign.”
But on Jan. 13, 2021 – the day the House voted to impeach Trump over the Jan. 6 Capitol riot – FEC attorneys suddenly reversed themselves and recommended the commission take no further action against Chalupa or the DNC. In a 4 to 2 vote, FEC commissioners closed the case. Voting with the majority, longtime Democratic commissioner Ellen Weintraub dismissed the Ukraine-DNC collusion allegations as “Russian disinformation.”
Defending the DNC in the case was Clinton attorney Marc Elias, then of Perkins Coie, which refused to comply with the commission’s subpoenas for DNC depositions and documents, including phone records.
"We attempted to interview several former DNC officials who interacted with Chalupa on the Manafort issue, but each denied our interview request,” acting FEC General Counsel Lisa Stevenson said in a case report.
She said investigators were forced to rely primarily on testimony and documents from Chalupa, even though Chalupa claimed she could not access critical text messages with DNC officials. Stevenson said investigators put more stock in Chalupa’s testimony than that of Andrii Telizhenko, the Ukrainian Embassy official who swore Chalupa coordinated with the Ukrainian government in an election interference plot. Chalupa told investigators she thought Telizhenko might be “a mole for the Russian Federation.” She also suggested he was “mentally unwell."
Stevenson also decided not to investigate fresh evidence of potential wrongdoing that surfaced late in the case and cast doubt on Chalupa’s candor in her sworn 2019 statements.
"Chalupa apparently made two other requests of the embassy related to exposing Manafort, which she did not mention but which [senior Ukrainian Embassy official Oksana] Shulyar disclosed in June 2020,” Stevenson said. "Shulyar recalls that Chalupa separately asked for the embassy to talk with a journalist writing a story on Manafort and to approach a member of Congress (unidentified, but most likely [Democratic Rep. Marcy] Kaptur given Shulyar’s description) to initiate a congressional investigation into Manafort.”
Nevertheless, the top FEC attorney claimed investigators didn’t have time to explore the revelations and urged the FEC to button up the case.
"These requests [by Chalupa] could support finding additional violations of the [FEC] Act and commission regulations, but in light of the time remaining within the statute of limitations and the lack of further specific information regarding these requests — the existence of which was not revealed until late in the investigation — we do not recommend that the commission expend further resources in pursuing such a finding,” Stevenson said.
However, the federal statute of limitations on such matters runs five years, which means investigators had another six months to evaluate whether the new information constituted a violation.
In addition to omitting critical information from her testimony, Chalupa appears to have made up a story about Telizhenko trying to bribe her friends to collect dirt on her. “Chalupa identified two individuals who she claimed were approached by Telizhenko and offered money in exchange for dirt on her,” Stevenson noted. “However, when we interviewed these individuals, both denied that Telizhenko had made any such overture to them."
Perkins Coie is now a central target of Durham’s ongoing investigation. Former Perkins lawyer Michael Sussmann faces felony charges related to his work digging up anti-Trump dirt for the Clinton campaign in 2016. And Durham recently brought his former partner Elias before his grand jury to testify under subpoena. Durham also has obtained thousands of pages of subpoenaed documents from Perkins.
While it cannot be determined if Durham has subpoenaed DNC documents, he has received documents from “the Clinton campaign” under subpoena, according to a recent discovery filing in the Sussmann case. And he presumably has access to the cell phone Chalupa used to contact DNC officials in 2016, since the FBI imaged it after she claimed she’d been hacked by the Russians.
Chalupa has denied coordinating DNC opposition research with the Ukrainian Embassy in 2016 or breaking any laws, even though she admits discussing Manafort’s activities in Ukraine with embassy personnel and trying to get then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to issue anti-Manafort statements during the campaign.
The former Clinton White House aide and longtime DNC operative insists she acted out of a sense of patriotism, not politics – a common refrain among officials who fueled the Trump-Russian “collusion” hysteria.
The Ukrainian-American claims she wasn’t just trying to protect her ancestral homeland but also America.
“I was moved to warn Americans out of a sense of duty to our country,” Chalupa said in a statement to the FEC. “Not for a moment did I view that doing so was a partisan issue, but rather was purely out of national security interests. … Again, this was not a political issue, but rather a matter of U.S. national security."
She maintained that an explosive January 2017 Politico exposé by Kenneth Vogel and David Stern – “Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire” – that formed the basis for the FEC complaint against her and the DNC was “malicious” and filled with “false accusations” against her. She also speculated that Vogel was used by Trump operatives who “planted” the story with Politico to create a “counternarrative” to distract attention from the Russiagate narrative, which was raging at the time thanks to the January 2017 leaking of the Steele dossier.
“It is worth noting that in late 2017, I met with Ken Vogel for almost two hours and Vogel apologized to me for the Politico article and offered to write another one for the New York Times [where he now works] to clarify the truth,” Chalupa said. However, she said she no longer trusted the award-winning investigative reporter and declined the offer.
Vogel, who now reports for the New York Times, did not respond to requests for comment, but Politico has not retracted its story or appended any corrections to it. And Chalupa has not attempted to sue the news site for libel. That would be difficult, since she doesn’t deny telling Vogel that Ukrainian Embassy officials were “helpful” to her crusade to raise the alarm about Manafort and Trump, or that they provided “guidance,” though she contends she was “sleep deprived” when he called and asked her about it. She also doesn’t deny telling Vogel she traded information and leads with the embassy.
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2022/03/10/election_overseer_found_dnc_chalupa_broke_rules_over_ukraine_then_reversed_its_finding_after_jan_6_820892.html
Paul Sperry/ @paulsperry_ 04/24/2024 22:43:53
ID: Twitter Web App
Twitter: 1783326032105292251
BREAKING:According to deposition transcript, Biden's Ukraine coup architect Victoria Nuland confirmed Eric Ciaramella was "in charge of Ukraine policy" under Biden & cleared her into WH meetings on Ukraine, where they discussed Prosecutor Shokin & Burisma
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2024/04/17/impeachment_whistleblower_was_in_the_loop_of_biden-ukraine_affairs_that_trump_wanted_probed_1024937.html
Paul Sperry/ @paulsperry_ 04/19/2024 10:26:41
ID: Twitter Web App
Twitter: 1781328569857187846
Subpoena Eric Ciaramella
https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6351207265112
3:52
https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6351207265112
this area of the interwebs is for Q research
you dont belong here, go back to pornhub
filturd
InteractivePolls
@IAPolls2022
 2024 GE: Emerson/The Hill
ARIZONA
 Trump 48% (+4)
 Biden 44%
.
GEORGIA
 Trump 47% (+3)
 Biden 44%
.
WISCONSIN
 Trump 47% (+2)
 Biden 45%
.
PENNSYLVANIA
 Trump 47% (+2)
 Biden 45%
.
NORTH CAROLINA
 Trump 47% (+5)
 Biden 42%
.
NEVADA
 Trump 45% (+1)
 Biden 44%
.
MICHIGAN
 Trump 45% (+1)
 Biden 44%
538: #9 (2.9/3.0) | 7,000 RV | 4/25-29
https://truthsocial.com/@IAPolls2022/posts/112359829875336617
Diamond and Silk
@DiamondandSilk
Do you trust Ron?

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
14h
I am very happy to have the full and enthusiastic support of Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida. We had a great meeting yesterday, arranged by mutual friend Steve Witkoff, at his beautiful Shell Bay Club in Hollywood, Florida. The conversation mostly concerned how we would work closely together to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. Also discussed was the future of Florida, which is FANTASTIC! I greatly appreciate Ron’s support in taking back our Country from the Worst President in the History of the United States. November 5th is a BIG DAY!!!
Apr 30, 2024, 12:14 AM
https://truthsocial.com/@DiamondandSilk/posts/112358226967544988
Darla.
@soliYHWH
6h
Replying to @DiamondandSilk
Skull & bones, never.
https://truthsocial.com/@Duphorn
And hold your breath.
Dan Scavino
@DanScavino
0:24
Apr 30, 2024, 7:05 AM
https://truthsocial.com/@DanScavino/posts/112359842146667725
Dan Scavino / @DanScavino 04/30/2024 07:05:30
ID: Not Available
Truth Social: 112359842146667725
00:00
00:00
00:00
Image Name: 1a7996c70b400dd0.mp4
Filename: 1a7996c70b400dd0.mp4
ENCODING GONE WRONG?
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
7h
Rob Schmitt: “It’s amazing what’s been exposed…in just how filthy this case is…”
5:39
https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/I/y/F/q/IyFqr.caa.mp4
Apr 29, 2024, 11:36 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112358078358175912
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Rob Schmitt: “Bombshell docs point to 'coordinated' legal assault on Trump”
Bombshell docs point to 'coordinated' legal assault on Trump: Rob Schmitt Tonight
BOMBSHELL: Rob Schmitt and Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discuss findings which reveal potentially damning insight on a "coordinated" legal assault wag…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8_twUaxkbw
Apr 29, 2024, 11:23 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112358025771956733
BOMBSHELL: Rob Schmitt and Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discuss findings which reveal potentially damning insight on a "coordinated" legal assault waged against Trump regarding the classified documents case.
9:12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8_twUaxkbw
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
More on New Green Swindle:
How Much More Per Kilowatt Hour via Illegal Votes?
.15449 ("Green") - .09556(Con Edison) = +.05893
.05893 (increase) divided by .09556 (Con Ed base) = 62%
CC: @TalkoftheSound
https://truthsocial.com/@Rasmussen_Poll/posts/112359979120911141