Muchos Gratias, Pastelero!
>>20807045 (PB)
>Oct 30
Up coming Monday 30th's
> thought he had high odds of scoring some poon
Thinking with his little head. Wonder if the lying rat was also caught cheating on his wife? That would be GOLDEN.
James, can we get an interview with the wife, just for KEKS?
That's funny, considering what they call
antisemitic in the New Testament is based on
the Old Testament/Torah descriptions.
The Old Testament tells us the Biblical history of Edom,
occupying Judah and rebuilding Solomons Temple,
and multiple times describing Edomites as Jews.
It's not antisemitic, it's Biblical Fact.
And they want to yet again censor it.
Remove the New Testament and the world
will still read in the Torah, who the Jews really are.
>it was the romans
Not according to the book.
While the Romans militarily occupied Judah,
The Jews, as the RULERS, were still permitted
running their own government and judging
by their own laws. That's why the Jews
delivered Jesus to Pilate, with accusations he'd
broken [their] laws.
[They] simply used Pilate, as the tool,
thereby according to their laws, absolving
themselves of doing the actual deed.
Their cunning has never known any bounds.
Listen Jew shill, we all see your slide. Scripture is very clear.
Nice try soy boy snowflake Agent Smith.
Advanced KEK.
Israelites, Judeans, were not Biblical Jews.
Yes, some Jews "believed on Him"
1 Thessalonians 2:14
For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:
Correct, remember Herod, an Edomite Jew, reigns as King, while under Roman occupation.
Looks like you failed reading and comprehension in school.
What were the teachers remarks?
Wait, let me guess, Short attention span and lack of focus?
Identity theft which goes back to 568 BC. Edomites.
Just because he knew they would kill him and he was willing to fight his cause till death, doesn't mean they didn't kill him.
Flawed shill logic, which you continue inserting into the argument, like it's your own personal slide, which you discovered, adding bonus Sheckles to your pay check.
Genesis 18:26 Context
23And Abraham drew near, and said, Wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked? 24Peradventure there be fifty righteous within the city: wilt thou also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are therein? 25That be far from thee to do after this manner, to slay the righteous with the wicked: and that the righteous should be as the wicked, that be far from thee: Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? 26And the LORD said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes. 27And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes: 28Peradventure there shall lack five of the fifty righteous: wilt thou destroy all the city for lack of five? And he said, If I find there forty and five, I will not destroy it. 29And he spake unto him yet again, and said, Peradventure there shall be forty found there. And he said, I will not do it for forty's sake.
He said, "Salvation is of the Jews", prophesying that they would kill him and sacrifice the lamb.