>>2081334

Baker Advice

When you start the new bread, it often hangs at 100%.

Ignore it. Open a new browser tab and ctrl-f for your post number. When you find it, click on its

number and finish your bake there. When done, close the original tab. Announce in previous bread.

The above has always worked for me. Just remember to work from the index, NOT the catalog.

>>2081382

BO, can you verify this baker? With all the shills around and no baker graphic, I'd like some assurance.

No offense, prospective baker. If you're really a baker, I'm sure you understand.

>>2081449

Thanks, BO.

>>2081382

Hope you weren't offended by my comments, Baker. Godspeed.

>>2081501

Another baker already took it, confirmed trusted baker by BO…

>>2081415

>>2081449

>>2081536

I recognize your graphic, Baker. Which baker are you for next time I get or give a handoff? (not baking this time, as I'm going to bed now)

>>2081559

Works for me. Good night.

>>2081707

There's nothing so sure to make someone a conservative than to have gainful employment.

Trump has done this for more blacks and hispanics than every president before him. THAT

is why #walkAway is going viral.

>>2081750

The original post makes good points. Perhaps it is Q pointing to false emails and false flags

>>2081764

but the points made are valid. I think it should be a notable.

>>2081676 Anon makes salient points re: Recent Q pics (Anti-Q in tenor)

Baker, your call.

>>2081924

I disagree. Q posted those pics (or reposted, replied, whatever). Anons are being asked to ignore

discrepancies or questions. We should never ignore anything Q posts. It is for us to figure it out.

Perhaps Q wants us to make a connection between the discrepancies and something Q

already mentioned or will mention soon. If we ignore any evidence, we might be missing something

very important later.

I say put it up as a notable.