Just got back and have made no attempt to figure out if you're a NEWBIE making an honest mistake, OR you are a glowing clown fucking up on purpose. It doesn't matter, we will know next thread.

PLEASE NAME THE THREADS IN STANDARD TIME HONORED FASHION:

Q Research General #xxxx (then whatever you like)

Your repeatedly ignoring this request makes those of us Archiving the threads to rename every damn one of them since you aren't following directions. They need to be consistent to maintain any kind of sort order, and the standard was set well before you showed up 2500 threads later. This should not be an advanced concept.

Please acknowledge this and adjust your effort to be a team player rather than acting like you are from the other side.

>>2081892

No I did not.

Do not have the desire to, nor have acquired the means.

Simply getting frustrated, when presumably it's the same baker doing this whenever he/she/it shows up.

There is plenty to do without creating more work for each other, that is all.

>>2081960

Really. How is it you credit me, for another brother copying what I initially wrote?

I appreciated him helping me call attention to what looks like blatant fuckupedness, even if you're paranoid.

Not sure why that bothers you?