>>2081720

Possible deniability. Messages not intended for us. Diversion ("Q posted a picture! Cross reference guests in WH/AF1 STAT" - some glowing pufferfish)

Whats wierder is that the intended "proofs" where of OBVIOUS stocks. Not edited to try and fool us. Playing with the idea that maybe Q is faking all of it, why go through so much to trouble, the clock, timing trumps tweets, everything else, just to fall flat on a super mega obvious stockphoto?

Those photos aren't for us. I'm sure of it. But the Q timers are.

>>2081824

Honestly. After being on this train on and off since 4ch (life happens), I feel its the small victories that count.

And i want to say something along the lines of "Q works in mysterious ways". He/she is trying to prove a point with the disinfo. As i said, if shit goes sideways, there needs to be cover for a recovery. We dont know the full plan. But as another anon said, >>2081764

There are reasons for him/her posting said info. The widespread redpill will come in time. That im certain of. Even though Q said they might have to "force this" (In regards to the ultimate question) - We anons assume it has to do about Q. (Ergo "Who is Q?") When in reality the info of the ultimate question might not have been reveled. It could be anything from "Why aren't you just declassiying the info?" to "What are the 40k indictments?"

we simply dont know. We might have inside info, Alot of it. but not all of it.

Trust the plan Anon. Future proves past. I am as fustrated as you (and many others are) but stay the course, theres rough seas ahead, and we're going to need every hand on deck.