>>2081315 [trigger warning, trigger warning]
To me, this is a more than fair concern/explanation etc. Muh "all pictures are originals…think of what that means" (until they're proven to be stock images). Then it's "muh, disinfo is necessary" or, the most recent retort, "when you hold said pic 36 degrees away from dead center, and you enhance the contrast and stretch the edges, you will see they are, in fact, different images!"
So I ask, what purpose is served creating doubt and confusion among the GA, on the very cusp of breaking through to mainstream, and the answer is "Q is sending messages to the other side and there's no reason for you to understand…this is 5d chess for crying out loud!"
I'll tell you what this cluster-fuck accomplished. Now no journalist will dare looking a fool by asking the President what the meaning of Q is. Even Jim Accosta has standards!
People jump on my jock anytime I post anything that borders on a rational question. I get it though:
"Trust the Plan!"
While each day brings more reports of the lunatic-left acting violently towards conservative, law-abiding citizens.
Shills don't bother calling me out for my
'muh feelings.'
I'm becoming a Concerfag and proud of it.
"Trust BUT VERIFY" (emphasis added)