Anonymous ID: 65c463 May 4, 2024, 3:53 a.m. No.20817759   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8274 >>8344 >>8402

i dont believe you

 

Australian lawmakers send letter urging Biden to drop case against Julian Assange on World Press Freedom Day

 

Press freedom groups called for the release of Julian Assange and other journalists around the world fighting legal cases

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/australian-lawmakers-letter-urging-biden-drop-case-julian-assange-world-press-freedom-day

Anonymous ID: 65c463 May 4, 2024, 5:41 a.m. No.20817921   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7929 >>7931 >>7933 >>8274 >>8344 >>8402

IRS Demands Another $20 Billion From Congress, Plans to Hire 14,000 More Employees to Harass Taxpayers and Investigate ‘Discriminatory’ Practices

 

The Internal Revenue Service is demanding a further $20 billion from Congress in order to hire another 14,000 more employees as part of an effort to better “serve taxpayers.”

 

According to IRS Commissioner, Daniel Werfel, the agency needs the money in order to fund technology upgrades and improve its customer service:

 

The IRS will continue focusing on making improvements and efficient use of funding. But to stress the importance of continuing this momentum, the IRS will continue working to make a difference for the nation’s taxpayers. At the same time, it’s critical that the IRS has stable, secure funding to allow technology modernization and taxpayer service improvements to continue into the future.

 

Werfel added that he plans to hire a further 14,000 employees over the next few years, with an estimated workforce of 102,500 by 2029.

 

We believe that figure represents a ‘right-sized’ IRS, reflecting the needs to serve taxpayers and responsibly enforce the law given the complexity of the nation’s tax laws. That number won’t even be a record high for the IRS workforce. It’s still well below the numbers from the late 1980s and early 1990s.

 

His pleas come less than two years after Congress passed the so-called Inflation Reduction Act, which included a staggering $80 billion windfall for the agency to expand its operations.

 

Meanwhile, Werfel also pledged to take steps to address the significant dispraity audit rates between Black taxpayers and other filers, arguing this “degrades trust in our tax system.”

 

“We are overhauling compliance efforts to advance our commitment to fair, equitable and effective tax administration and hold ourselves accountable to taxpayers we serve,” he said.

 

“We have taken swift initial action to dramatically reduce the number of those audits,” he continued. “We have also made changes to the selection criteria for those audits.”

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/irs-demands-another-20-billion-congress-plans-hire/

Anonymous ID: 65c463 May 4, 2024, 6:24 a.m. No.20818098   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8150 >>8344 >>8402

NY vs. Trump: Bragg's own witness, Hope Hicks, implodes case against Trump

 

The only crime here is Bragg’s grotesque abuse of the law.

 

The legal wrangling between two lawyers who executed a legal contract on behalf of their respective clients is what attorneys do every day. It was booked in Trump’s private business records as "legal expenses" because that is what they were. Nothing was falsified, as Bragg claims in his indictment. But the D.A. wants to put Trump in prison for following his attorney’s legal advice.

 

Bragg must have skipped his law school class when the "doctrine of impossibility" was taught. You can’t pick an empty pocket. Nor can you unlawfully influence an election after the election. In his charges, Bragg contends that Trump falsified business records in 2017. But the presidential contest occurred in 2016, making it impossible to even complete the intended crime for which he stands accused.

 

There is no mistaking the boomerang effect here. Voters see this for precisely what it is: a pathetically weak case designed to damage Trump politically to the benefit of President Joe Biden’s reelection chances.

 

Let’s hope the jurors see that, too.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ny-vs-trump-braggs-witness-hope-hicks-implodes-case-against-trump

Anonymous ID: 65c463 May 4, 2024, 6:26 a.m. No.20818105   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8112 >>8165 >>8291 >>8334 >>8344 >>8365 >>8391 >>8402 >>8406 >>8415 >>8416 >>8425 >>8428

START THE COURT MARTIAL PROCEEDINGS: DC National Guard Whistleblower Alleges Trump’s Commander-in-Chief Powers Were Revoked by Military Brass During January 6 Capitol Riot

 

According to Colonel Earl Matthews, who testified before Congress in April, US military leaders revoked President Trump’s Commander-in-Chief powers that day and refused to move in the National Guard – because it might look bad.

 

These military leaders should have been arrested and court martialed.

 

The Daily Mail reported:

 

Donald Trump’s authority as commander-in-chief was ignored by senior military leadership on January 6, 2021, claims the chief legal advisor for D.C. National Guard on that day.

 

Colonel Earl Matthews came forward as a whistleblower to the House subcommittee reviewing the January 6 Select Committee’s investigation.

 

He sat down with DailyMail.com two weeks after the public hearing to explain what he saw happen that day.

 

He claims that Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, and then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, were plotting to disobey any orders handed down by Trump because they ‘unreasonably’ assumed the then-president was going to break the law and try to use the D.C. National Guard (DCNG) to stop certification of the 2020 presidential election results.

 

A lot has been made about the breakdown in military and administration communication when it came to the timeline of deploying DCNG to the Capitol.

 

But Matthews claims senior military leadership was solely focused on getting the heat off of them and putting it back onto Trump.

 

The Select Committee on the January 6 Attack, Matthews claims, was more than happy to lean into this narrative and blame the entire ordeal on the then-president.

 

But Matthews says that senior military leadership essentially stripped the president of his authority as commander-in-chief by preemptively planning to go against orders because they didn’t like the optics of uniformed soldiers at the Capitol.

 

‘I think a very plausible argument can be made that through no fault of his own, President Trump’s command authority over both the D.C. National Guard and the U.S. Army itself had been surreptitiously curtailed by the senior leadership of the Army on January 6, 2021,’ Matthews told DailyMail.com.

 

He continued: ‘Army leadership had unreasonably anticipated an ‘unlawful order’ from the President, an order that the President had no plans to issue, and were preemptively seeking to curtail his discretion to issue such an order.’

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/start-court-martial-proceedings-dc-national-guard-whistleblower