>>20841280

>Barron Trump. Hasn't said words in public. Zero emotion. Never once seen with a smile. No political views ever expressed. No position on a single belief or foreign policy.

Agree. Without meaning offence & not trying to be ageist, as I know lots of young peeps who are way smarrter than anon in tech/science/math etc etc. But there is always the tomato & fruitsalad thing called 'wisdom'.

eg How does an 18yo have any 'wisdom' / experience / understanding? more to the point why would any 'older' figure give any cred to Baron other than family ties. aka the 'hunter' may or may not be a chip of the same block, 'kidz' don't alway turn out same as parents.

However the biggest 'thing' for this anon, is why would he even want to jump in, given what dad has been going through, why not do a law/business/mechanic/carpenter course or 3, then have a stab at poloticking? just seems strange to throw him in deep end. Ivanka on the other hand might make a great senator or something.

>>20841324

>you think Ivanka's social circles have a lot of MAGA hat wearing folks

Not sure on that, but she has the edge in picking up votes from 50% population. Haven't heard her deliver many speeches, might have one of those whiney annoying voices? but she seems to have 'confidence' which can go a long way, no idea if she has any interest other than running as a decoy for ??? Melania seems more 'support'/wingman rather than 'leader' to anon.

>>20841331

>esus said kill these filthy Jews

Are you sure? Which bibel are you quoting from?

Have you read a bibel? a bibel from pre ~1500AD ? "jew" is a made up word, never existed before ~1500AD. Rothy insert?

>>20841362

>but 3x

ALL 'books' were written by men, to control a few men (who could read), who controlled the first 50%. 2nd 50% controlled by 1st 50%.

ALL BS, maybe old-testy was something, but still a book, written by MAN. inc the BS 325AD catlickers chi-arch BS.

My mis-spellings may be on porpoise ;-)

>>20841368

>no, just no

OK than. No probs. anon search pre 1500AD books & found no mention. You do you, just remember it has been a LOOONg GAME.

Since you seem good at words, did you look up "walking on water" ? Hebrews never seen beefore, so didn't have a word for it, so made one up. Was common in Asia (place of youth)

>>20841377

>KJV

did deeper, go back in time, KJV is a re-write

>>20841409

>well before the 2018 midterms Q expected RED TSUNAMI and went AWOL for awhile after that failed to materialize

Theory: Trump 'won' in '16 (hrc was taken out), then trump was surrounded by deepstate.

Another 4yrs or same-same?

or maybe Trump got some 'bench-time', while the whole sh!tshow came down while brandon / obummer had the steering wheel?

out played?

>>20841417

>at a distance of 2.6 million miles

missed by 'this' much

>>20841446

as much as I hate to admit it, is a US citizen

Are you sure? Somethings just seem sus

>>20841463

>The passage refutes the false claim jew

How does one, logically, refute a false claim?

The word either did or did not, anon couldn't find it, please advise where it first appeared so I can update my learning.

if the word 'jew' was added 'later', and was added by rothy, then fast fwd to 1918/1947 and the whole kazarian (liars, cheats & swindlers) 'story' adds up to a total fabrication. Happy to be corrected with some actual facts, anon wasn't there/around at time, & 'history' is just words in a book &/or opinion, not always 'fact' (propaganda is real, & always has been as a 'weapon)

>>20841476

>not involved in argument between you two but this

anon is NOT looking or trying to 'argue' just researching trying to make sense of bigger piccy, hopefully with those here that seek truth rather than accept truth aka maybe BS with an agenda.

King James Version (KJV), English translation of the Bible, published in 1611 under the auspices of King James I of England.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/King-James-Version

>>20841474

>Everything xxx filthy fuckwit Jews

I corrected that for you. I am NOT a jew, put one in front of me & once has struck me I'll cut his balls off, stick 'em in his mouth & slit his throat. I hate kikes

>>20841486

>terror group by the same name came later

yea funny how that happened. hamas was created by israil also, to play both sides & create opportunities. the kazarian way, always has been.

>>20841488

>meaning the inhabitants of Judea

yea & thats what lead anon to start searching. "from land of judea" makes sense historically.

fwiw anons research points to the ONLY actual "semites" are the Pali's in Gaza.

and again that makes sense to anon, the kazahs stole the word & applied it to themselves.

>>20841497

>The version King James established had already been written prior to 1500AD

really? how does one write a book before one writes it? or do you mean re-write / edit?

YOUR 'logic' fails me, but you do you, code away, I'm just researching trying to learn/understand & spot BS

>>20841528

>I hate kikes

>Glad to hear.

Well sort off, By saying "I hate kikes" I'm implying that kikes actually exist, which they do not. So i'm sorta against something that doesn't exist, except there are many who think kikes do. Conundrum :-)

>>20841529

>This literally translates to "neither Jew nor Greek" in English.

Exactly, allow me to update: (based on MY learning fwiw)

"neither those from Judea or Greece"

>>20841544

>>20841544

>Are you trying to be dense or is it coming naturally?

Naturally, I'm a mental retard, born that way.

And the simple fact that YOU claim to be correct & I am incorrect on something, does NOT make YOU correct, you just think you are.

But I am a retard. Accepted

>>20841551

>Oh they do,

Not in my mind, just kazahs

I have MOST of the puzzle already figured, in my mind, logically, prob is waking up the 8b sheeple, but I see progress on that front, so all good, just waiting for world to catch up really, prob just like you.

>>20841554

>"You just think you are".

Correct

>>20841610

>I imagine legally the Q team can only do so much

don't 'imagine', consider 1 guy, 1 team VS "how da f'ck" does one change the mindset of billions? marketing? ad on FB?

Gonna need EVERYONE (as much as possible) to start asking Q's. Then progress can happen. otherwise just one guy pissing in wind really.

>>20841621

>nd the history of Christianity

cool, di you find the tomb with 2 coffins 1 NS other EW per traditions?

Crux takes a long time, the whole point, to send a msg. 3 days doesn't cut it (flesh wound). did you check the pot residues? embalming & healing oils are different.

Just stuff anon came across doing research, anon wasn't there, i don't think or 'member if i was, dimentia :-)

>>20841637

>Trump is being a bad boy in the courtroom.

Yea, isn't it great, whats the bet he is trying ever so slightly to push the boundary?

Imagine the judge giving Trump some B& B for a few days based on 1st Amen. The media/marketing…HUGE. Is that the GAME?

>>20841740

>faggot ass Merchan to ease it back a bit.

I thought that also, and then Trump amps another level. How far will the Judge go? (they) know that B&B for 1st amen would be a nightmare for (them).

The other cases are after nov from what I saw, which means this STORMY case is it. This is hamberger hill time. (they) can't in all logic lock him up on 1stamen would be really stupid. Add the STORMYLETTER that zipped happened but is not admissible for 'reasons'. Then add Stormy's 'blackout' moment on the bed. So if nothing happened there could NOT have been a 'hush' pmt. Maybe a donation to an 'artist'? Accountant f'ck up over a donation? Forgot to tax deduct the donation?

>>20841783

>Should a former President be cursing loudly in a courtroom? Does that teach his supporters that it is acceptable behavior?

Perhaps better Q is: Should a former(?) President be in court based on BS dem/brandon charges? Wonder what obummer & bush are thinking right about now?

Looking at witnesses is a problem? Shaking head at BS is a problem? Shouting out "f'ck you judge" might be over the top, but that is NOT what is happening from what i have read (but msm so who really knows). But speaking out about his case to the media? why is that a problem for the judge? ANS: Trump was meant to just lay down, he didn't & hasn't. What is at stake is the bigger Q.

>>20841795

>why did the COWBOY butt fucker porn star even get 130 thousand dollars in the first place

From what anon has read, Cohn made the pmt.

It was made becuse an Aussie guy wanted to shut down any neg media before it started. The facts re did or din't happen didn't come into it pre '16. Stormy letter was '18 from memory.

>>20841804

>She never wanted to be President.

Pull the other one. She was NEVER meant to lose, remember? 90% in the polls etc.

Trump did NOT win '16, hrc lost, she was taken out aka Hillaried via wikileaks dumps, (they) never expected that, & could not counter the chess move.

Take a look at Trumps face when he won, he was as surprised as hilldawg was.

>>20841858

>Trump damn sure did win

Well sorta. As I said, hrc LOST, Trump was surprised, f'ckery happened & dems still couldn't cheat so yea Trump "won".

This time it is going to be a WIN, a descisive one imho. Except if biden/brandon/dave gets 150m votes (mostly mail ins), then we are all back to future & square 1, except if that happens there will be a civil war? or social credit scores. Better hope for a RealWIN imho. But need to get rid of "counting/fraud" machines. Hand count & Trump wins by ~65%-70% ???

>>20841954

>ax pusher Chris Cuomo Admits He Has Vax Related Side Effects

Are they serious side effects? Couldn't happen to a nicer scumbag

Karma is a bitch.