insta faggot filter.
Why won't you add some self identifying text to accompany your self identifying famefagging shitty memes so genuine anons can filter your aese forever and never have to confronted by lame arsed meme attempts?
Because you are a supper faggot is why.
Even though I state your arse is filtered, you programme will not allow you not to respond and you will reply with another crappy meme that annon will thankfully not see.
Tell your bot-handler to do a flip.
Try to identify me in next bread without that image.
>That exception
They were just a couple of examples.
Anon is sure there are multiple ways to identify individual posters, but those methods identified are not used to promote an online identity.
That makes all the difference.
He was always a famefag.
Great. When you see my posts in the next bread, a simple I see you response will be sufficient to prove your skills are greater than your mouth.
Anon would love to see some evidence backing up this clone theory apart from a shit load of photos showing some physical similarities.
Anon is not saying black project cloning doesn't exist, but the theory of replacing public faces with clones stretches the credulity unless the clones were created at the time of birth of the original, and this is not beyond credulity, but anon has seen no evidence to support this.
Anons deal in facts, but entertain possibilities.
You were either dropped on your head at birth and suffered brain damage or else you are a bad actor.
There is no in between except retardation. There is always that option.
Which one is it?
Show me evidence backing up your statement and I am willing to reconsider my position.
I can say any old shit online, but that doesn't make my words true without supporting evidence.
>like what.
Oh, I dunno, maybe a published medical journal or even unpublished, as long as sources are cited and verifiable;
How do we verify anything here on QR?
>Have you seen Boys From Brazil?
Yes, gregory Peckory, anon has.
But a fictional film is evidence of what?
Oh yeah, I almost forgot, they have to show you what they are doing.
If we go by this supposition, every film ever made lays out their diabolical intentions and actual practices.
Oh, anon is very familiar with predictive programming, but how is one supposed to separate the wheat from the chaff without additional evidence to back it up?
Oh, bravo. Accuse me of being a newfag. That'll work for sure.
Damn, your answers are so convincing I will now accept every post on here as true because muh how do you verfiy.
Anon can comfortably accept this as highly plausible.
>>20844989
Ah, the anti fame/namefaggotry shill arrives to paint genuine anons who decry the practice as shill faggots.
Your shillfu is weak.
The global 2 party system must be destroyed forever.
If all candidates are independent, how can anyone control them all?
A great actor indeed.
Despite the physically dissimilarities, some schmucks still bought it?
WWG1WGA
The David Icke clip is so prescient.
Shame he was fed so much crap that he gobbled up like nectar of the Gods believing it to be truth that he discredited himself and any hope for emancipating the masses from their torpor..
Its behaviour reeks of bot stench.
Anus compromised.
Penetration incoming
(Now, wait until confirmation arrives and anon feels like the anon who called unsigned in Q a faggot when Q signedin).
The filtered pigbotfaggot responding further verifies this post as truth.
Go back far enough and we all are.
Icke strikes anon as truly believing what he says. Anon, however, uses discernment and doesn't,