Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 8:14 a.m. No.20847037   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7039 >>7041

Biden tells a lie a minute during CNN interview

By Post Editorial Board.1/2

The White House rarely allows President Biden to sit down for interviews, and Wednesday’s chat with CNN’s Erin Burnett shows why.

 

In a brief 17 minutes, Biden told 15 lies — nearly a lie a minute.

 

From whoppers about the economy to prevarications on Israel, Biden spun a fantasyland of a presidency that voters know is false.

 

Here’s a rundown:

 

LIE 1: “I’ve created over 15 million jobs since I’ve been president.”

 

Biden’s favorite falsehood, told over and over and over again no matter how many fact-checks call him out.

 

He took office at the tail end of a pandemic that blew a hole in the economy, when lockdown policies wholeheartedly endorsed by Democrats took people out of the office and onto COVID stimulus checks.

 

He “created” nothing — after the introduction of the vaccine, people returned to the workforce.

 

If anything, Biden’s policies slowed the recovery — it took until July 2022 for the US economy to regain all the jobs lost due to the pandemic.

 

LIE 2: “Other than Herbert Hoover, [Donald Trump] is the only president who has lost more jobs than he created.”

 

The corollary lie.

 

Trump didn’t “lose” jobs; he was president during a global pandemic.

 

And liberals were thrilled to put people on government checks and shut down the world during COVID.

 

They cannot argue that the job market would have been any different in 2020 under a Democrat.

 

LIE 3: “Look at what he says he’s going to do if he gets elected. Says he’s going to do away with what I’ve done on Medicare, reducing the price of Medicare.”

 

There’s no basis for this, as Trump has said he “will never do anything that will hurt or jeopardize Social Security or Medicare.”

 

Further, Trump pursued the exact same executive orders to lower prescription drug prices as did Biden.

 

LIE 4: “You know we have 1,000 billionaires in America. Know what their average federal tax is? 8.3%.”

 

Factcheck.org notes, “The top 0.1% of earners, with more than $4.4 million in expanded cash income, pay an average rate of 25.1% in federal income and payroll taxes.”

 

LIE 5: “We’ve already turned it around [on the economy].”

 

Burnett quoted some tough figures on the economy, noting that the cost of buying a home had doubled, and “Real income when you account for inflation is actually down since you took office.”

 

Biden’s response?

 

Denial.

 

LIE 6: “The polling data has been wrong all along.”

 

Every survey that says people are upset about the economy?

 

Every poll that puts Biden’s approval rating at historic lows?

 

They are all of them, from dozens of different sources, wrong?

 

LIE 7: “There’s corporate greed going out there. And it’s got to be dealt with.”

 

Labor costs increased 4.2% between 2023 and 2024.

 

They increased 5.1% from 2021 to 2022.

 

The costs of everything, from supplies to shipping, rent and taxes, have gone up.

 

Why?

 

Because of the huge amount of government money injected into the system, minimum-wage increases by California and other states, and pent-up demand by consumers.

 

How is Biden going to “deal with it”?

 

Tell companies they can’t raise prices to avoid losing money?

 

https://nypost.com/2024/05/09/opinion/biden-tells-a-lie-a-minute-during-cnn-interview/

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 8:14 a.m. No.20847041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7309

>>20847037

2/2

 

LIE 8: “[Inflation] was 9% when I came to office.”

 

This is the lie of the night.

 

Biden continues to pretend that the US was in terrible shape when he took office, when it was already on the rebound — thanks to Trump’s Warp Speed project that vaccinated people quickly against COVID.

 

Inflation was a measly 1.4% in January 2021.

 

Then Biden went on a first-year drunken-sailor spending spree, and inflation skyrocketed.

 

LIE 9: “They have the money to spend. It angers them and angers me that they have to spend more.”

 

They have the money to spend?

 

According to Bankrate, 76% of adults making less than $50,000 a year are living from paycheck to paycheck, an increase from 71% the year before that.

 

Biden need only watch the nightly news to see people cutting back on groceries, gas — even trips to McDonald’s — because their spending power has decreased.

 

LIE 10: “Civilians have been killed in Gaza as a consequence of those bombs, and other ways in which they go after population centers.”

 

It’s libel to suggest that Israel is deliberating targeting population centers.

 

Hamas embeds itself among the civilian population, creating bases inside hospitals and digging tunnels under residential apartments.

 

Israel has been warning the people of Rafah for more than a week to move to a safe zone outside the city.

 

They do not “go after” population centers, they work hard to minimize deaths while stopping the terrorists who kidnapped, raped and murdered Israeli civilians.

 

LIE 11: “We’re not walking away from Israel’s security. We’re walking away from Israel’s ability to wage war in those areas.”

 

But defeating Hamas is integral to Israel’s security.

 

How does Biden suggest Israel win the war if it leaves the last stronghold of the terrorist group untouched?

 

LIE 12: “It made no sense in my view to engage in thinking in Iraq they have a nuclear weapon.”

 

Biden brought this up, saying he warned Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu not to “make the mistakes” we made in Afghanistan and Iraq.

 

Except Biden voted in favor of invading Iraq.

 

So Biden may regret that decision today, but it made sense to him back them.

 

LIE 13: “You can’t only love your country when you win.”

 

Someone had better tell all the celebrities and elites in the Democratic Party who claim they are going to move if Trump is re-elected, or say they “don’t know their country anymore,” or who burn American flags as they rally for Hamas.

 

Biden’s chiding of Trump with this line would carry more weight if he said it to his own voters.

 

LIE 14: “I travel around the world, other world leaders, know what they all say, 80% of them, ‘You gotta win. My democracy is at stake.’ ”

 

Maybe we can’t say this is absolutely a lie, but it sure sounds like one of those statements for which the press loves to go after Trump.

 

Are other world leaders really pulling Biden aside after his nap and saying “democracy is at stake” if he loses? Give us a break.

 

LIE 15: “Then [Trump] is going to put in a 10% tax that’s going to increase average Americans’ cost $1,500 a year.”

 

Trump has proposed no such tax. Perhaps Biden means Trump’s plan for a 10% tariff on imported goods, which may or may not cost Americans more money.

 

You know who else is considering imposing tariffs? Biden. Just this week, under the headline “Biden Looks to Thwart Surge of Chinese Imports,” the New York Times notes that China is using unfair business practices and Biden wants to counter it.

 

https://nypost.com/2024/05/09/opinion/biden-tells-a-lie-a-minute-during-cnn-interview/

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 8:23 a.m. No.20847089   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7095 >>7100

May 9, 2024

Jack Smith has admitted to violating the same law used against J6 defendants

By Andrea Widburg

Special Prosecutor Jack Smith has just admitted that he and other DOJ and FBI minions manipulated documentary evidence underlying the Mar-a-Lago case against Donald Trump. Everybody from Judge Aileen Cannon on down realizes this is bad. Still, I wonderhow many people have noticed that Smith has admitted to doing what the J6 defendants are accused and have been convicted of doing: Violating 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). The statutory charges against the J6 defendants are a specious abuse of the law but they perfectly fit Smith’s admitted conduct.

One of the main tools in the DOJ arsenal against anyone near the Capitol on January 6, 2021, is § 1512(c)(2),which the DOJ claims means imprisonment for a person who “corruptly…obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding…” That is what the DOJ claims happened when ordinary Americans (a) exercised their rights of free speech and (b) usually inadvertently, entered onto Capitol land after masked agitators had removed “no trespassing” signage and fencing and after the Capitol police had opened the building’s doors. The penalty is fines and/or imprisonment, with the latter potentially as long as 20 years.

The Supreme Court, though, is hearing Fischer v. United States, which sees one of the DOJ’s victims contesting the DOJ’s assertion about § 1512(c)(2)’s applicability to the J6. The argument is that § 1512(c)(2)manifestly applies to a very narrow fact set; namely, corruptly interfering with evidencein an official investigation. Heck, it’s in the statute’s title: “Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant.” Every section of the statute manifestly deals solely with efforts to destroy or otherwise manipulate evidence in a matter intended to lead to a criminal indictment.

Nevertheless, to imprison ordinary Americans, the DOJ came down hard on subsection (c)(2) of the statute because it contains the phrase “official proceeding.”

(c) Whoever corruptly—

[snip]

(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

But while the DOJ is focusing everyone’s attention on subsection (2), they’re ignoring subsection (1):

(c) Whoever corruptly—

(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding…

Does that remind you of anything? It certainly does me.

It reminds me of Smith’s admission to Judge Aileen Cannon about his and his minions’ handling of the documents seized from Mar-a-Lago, documentsthat then served as the basis for his decision to indict Donald Trump. (Ignore, for now, the fact that Trump, as president of the United States, had plenary power to do as he would with national security information, unhindered either by prior Executive Orders, administrative regulations, or legislation. But back to Smith’s admission:

Prosecutors admitted in a court filing on Friday that “there are some boxes where the order of items within that box is not the same as in the associated scans.”The prosecutors had previously told the court that the documents were “in their original, intact form as seized.”

As any litigator knows, maintaining documents in the order in which they’re seized or produced is enormously important. That’s because order itself provides important information about the chronology of events or a person’s intent or innocence. It’s also of particular concern in this case because these documents were apparently packed by the General Services Administration, which then told Trump to pick them up.

In addition,it’s now beyond question that the DOJ doctored the crime scene photos it publicized to the worldto “prove” that Donald Trump had allegedly violated national security laws. (See my disclaimer above about Trump’s immunity from such a claim.)

Thus, we havetwo known instances in which the DOJ altered records, documents, and objects. Moreover, the staged Mar-a-Lago photo indicates that this was done to harm President Trump. That =strongly implies both corruption and intention, two elements of a criminal cause of action==.

When/if Trump returns to the White House, he needs to have his DOJ investigate the lead-up to how Smith and his minions altered and manipulated those documents. And if there’s reasonable evidence that they did so corruptly and intentionally, they must be prosecuted to the full extent of the actual laws, as written (as opposed to the Democrats’ “make it up as we go along” version of “law”). Our nation cannot survive with a partisan DOJ that is willing to violate the nation’s laws to destroy its perceived political opponents.

 

https://12ft.io/proxy

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 8:39 a.m. No.20847179   🗄️.is 🔗kun

NOVEMBER 5TH, WE'RE GONNA END IT!!!😎🇺🇸

 

I really love PDJT, his announcement are accurate and funny.

 

“And its Crooked’s Fault”

 

1:25

 

https://rumble.com/embed/v4rokjn/?pub=4

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 8:43 a.m. No.20847188   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7190 >>7342

THEY SAID IT!!! NOT ME!!!🤣🤣🤣

 

God this is funny, Stormy says she’s a medium and an ex boyfriend was inhabited by spirits! She’s their “star witness”. Yikes!

 

0:18

 

https://rumble.com/embed/v4rofmz/?pub=4

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 8:52 a.m. No.20847218   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7242

So Trump goes out to speak at the court and every time he bashes Merchan! I thought the judge said he’d send Trump to jail if he violates the gag order?

 

I think Merchan knows if he does that he’ll create more support for Trump. Plus he literally cannot do that to a prior President, a ton of red tape and its impossible under the SS charter to allow or expose Trump to be in a dangerous situation, and the have full authority to tell the judge “Fuck No”, according to Bongino.

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 8:57 a.m. No.20847242   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7293

>>20847218

I see how Trump gets away with bashing the case, the judge etche reads articles of attorneys, listen to this. I love PDJT, he is the funniest and brilliant President of all time.

Listen to this

 

RIGGED TRIAL!!! ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!

 

4:35

 

https://rumble.com/embed/v4rnlzx/?pub=4

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 9:31 a.m. No.20847386   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20847293

Its like reading a shitty diary of teenage girls. Lots of gossip and lying on the stand, the judge doesn’t have a problem with it if they are prosecution witnesses. Stormy thinks shes a medium now and takes up time to tell more stories of spirits. Cohen has lied multiple times on the stand, but no punishment for the little pervert Gomer Pile

 

Apparently all of that shit is important to the case to “Get Trump”.

 

The judge is a 100x harder in Trump's defense attorneys, but Colangelo and Bragg can get away with anything. If you thought Russiagate was ridiculous, This is like a badly written Laurel and Hardy movie

 

Its a big waste of time except its fun to watch PDJT come out and speak to the press.

 

Thats all I got! Kek

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 9:43 a.m. No.20847439   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20847286

Dore is right, Cuomo is literally the stupidest dog in the bunch and he’s still doing propaganda to cover for him knowingly stating the lie. But I’m pretty sure he stupider than his buddies

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 9:50 a.m. No.20847462   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7484

>>20847286

He’s asking clinicians because he announced he has bad effects from the shot. He’s so dumb he believed the propaganda given to him. Now he only has a 1/4 of his brain instead of 1/2. These people want to be let off the hook for lying to the public and killing millions WW

 

The guy should never be forgiven

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 10:04 a.m. No.20847519   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7526 >>7541 >>7549

This is Crazy

Citizen Free Press

@CitizenFreePres

 

Elderly anarchists glue their hands together, demanding an emergency plan to just stop oil by 2030.

 

They tried to break the glass protecting the Magna Carta.

 

Security Guards just stand and watch. Video is insane.

 

From

Just Stop Oil

12:50 PM · May 10, 2024

3,460

 

The Climate Cult even scared old people

 

https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1788974961480065474

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 10:14 a.m. No.20847576   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7580 >>7584 >>7588 >>7592 >>7685 >>7714 >>7750 >>7798 >>7840 >>7851

Appeals court upholds Steve Bannon’s contempt-of-Congress conviction for defying Jan. 6 subpoena

Tierney Sneed and Holmes Lybrand,

Updated 11:40 AM EDT, Fri May 10,

 

A federal appeals court on Friday upheld the contempt-of-Congress conviction of Steve Bannon, the ex-adviser to former President Donald Trump who was found guilty after failing to comply with a subpoena from the House January 6 committee.

 

Bannon’s conviction — and now, the DC Circuit’s affirmation of that conviction — is a boost to Congress’ leverage in its efforts going forward to obtain cooperation in its investigations.

 

The US DC Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously rejected several challenges Bannon made to the case, including his claim that the trial court excluded evidence he should have been allowed to put before the jury in his defense.

 

Bannon was sentenced to four months in federal prison, and that sentence was also upheld Friday by the appeals court. The ruling could pave the way for Bannon to eventually report to prison, though the timing is unclear.

 

The judge who presided over Bannon’s trial previously agreed to let him hold off from serving his sentence while his appeal played out. In its ruling Friday, the three-judge appeals panel gave Bannon time to appeal its ruling to the full DC-based appeals court before it formally notifies the trial judge that the conviction was upheld.

 

Bannon could also turn directly to the Supreme Court for additional appeals, possibly further delaying when he needs to start serving his prison term.

 

Bannon’s attorneys did not immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment.

 

In the DC Circuit’s new ruling, Judge Bradley Garcia, an appointee of President Joe Biden, backed the trial judge’s exclusion of an advice-of-counsel defense, as Bannon had claimed he had rebuffed the subpoena because of supposed executive privilege concerns expressed to him by his lawyer.

 

“This exact ‘advice of counsel’ defense is no defense at all,” Garcia wrote, noting that the contempt law only required proof that Bannon “deliberately and intentionally” did not respond to the subpoena.

 

His opinion was joined by Judge Cornelia Pillard, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, and Trump-appointed Judge Justin Walker.

 

The appeals court noted that “the communications from former President Trump’s counsel” that Bannon had tried to rely on to defend his conduct did not purport “to authorize Bannon’s refusal to produce any documents or appear for his deposition.”

 

The DC Circuit also rejected Bannon’s argument that the House select committee that investigated the January 6 insurrection was improperly formed.

 

“These objections suffer from a common defect,” the judges wrote. “Bannon did not raise them before the Select Committee and therefore forfeited them.”

 

Bannon is one of two former members of Trump’s inner circle who faced prosecution for not participating in the House January 6 probe. The second, former Trump White House aide Peter Navarro, is currently serving a four-month prison sentence for his 2023 conviction.

 

When the now-defunct House panel sought documents and testimony from Bannon in 2021, it pointed to alleged communications between Bannon and Trump in the days leading up to the January 6 Capitol attack, as well as comments Bannon made on his podcast the day before the riot that “all hell is going to break loose tomorrow.”

 

Bannon for some time served in Trump’s White House, but by the time of Trump’s crusade to overturn his 2020 electoral loss, Bannon had long left the federal government.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/10/politics/steve-bannon-appeal-denied/index.html

 

Breaking — DC Appeals Court upholds Steve Bannon contempt conviction for ignoring political J6 subpoena.

Bannon can request en banc hearing, or go to Supreme Court.

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 10:29 a.m. No.20847662   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7674 >>7677 >>7714 >>7798 >>7840 >>7851

Julie Kelly

@julie_kelly2

 

It's hard to describe what atotal sh*tshow the DC federal courthousewill become if/when SCOTUS reverses 1512(c)(2) for J6ers.

 

DC appellate court keeps putting on hold appellate proceedings in multiple cases pending SCOTUS decision. This motion granted Wednesday.

 

What this means is if SCOTUS rules against DOJ, a flood of motions to dismiss the count in pending cases, vacate existing convictions, and resentence/release J6ers imprisoned on the count.

 

More than 350 now chargedwith 1512(c)(2) and DOJ brazenly continues to bring the count against J6ers including a woman from California this week.

 

And it's even harder to describe thegratification I will feel watching these judges eat it day after day.

 

Holding the case in abeyance until the Supreme Court reaches an outcome in Fischer v. United States, No. 23-5572, will preserve judicial resources and avoid duplication of efforts and potentially unnecessary arguments. See Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 2 (*rules are to be interpreted to provide for the just determination of every criminal proceeding, to secure simplicity in procedure and tairness in administration, and to eliminate unjustitiable expense and delay"). The United States, through Assistant United States Attorney Elizabeth H. Danello, takes no position on the motion to hold in abeyance. WHEREFORE, Appellant Sean MeHlugh respectfully requests that the Court suspend the briefing schedule in this matter pending the Supreme Court's resolution of the application of 18 U.S.C. $ 1512 in

 

0:33 AM · May 10, 2024

·

160.5K

Views

 

https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1788940522695917953

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 10:33 a.m. No.20847677   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20847662

I hope they all get nailed to the cross and each and every judge that participated in this torture of peaceful protestors get sanctioned by the SC, and be remanded to go back and study the law!

 

Pray that this case wins in SC, it will save a lot of people and maybe the others will get reprieve. But knowing Garland and the head Executioner will try to charge them with other crimes

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 10:38 a.m. No.20847690   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Target will only sell Pride Month collection in some stores after backlash in 2023

JON HAWORTH

Fri, May 10, 2024 at 7:33 AM EDT

 

(Target Stores learns its lesson on transgender grooming.)

 

Target has announced that it will only sell their Pride Month collection in select stores after suffering a backlash and boycott last year during the 2023 Pride season.

 

The company says that instead of offering their Pride Month collection merchandise across all stores, they will be “offering a collection of products including adult apparel and home and food and beverage items, curated based on consumer feedback. The collection will be available on Target.com and in select stores, based on historical sales performance,” the company said in a statement on their website on Thursday.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/target-only-sell-pride-month-113300170.html

 

(I still haven’t been back to the store around the corner from house)

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 10:52 a.m. No.20847750   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7759 >>7840 >>7851

>>20847576

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸@julie_kelly2

 

BREAKING: DC appellate panel upholds contempt of Congress conviction of Steve Bannon.

 

One Obama, one Biden, and the Trump judge who screwed up the 1512c2 decision in Fischer deciding:

 

“GARCIA, Circuit Judge: In September 2021, the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol issued a subpoena to appellant Stephen Bannon to testify and provide documents. Bannon did not comply he knew what the subpoena required but did not appear or provide a single document. Bannon was later convicted of violating the contempt of Congress statute, 2 U.S.C. § 192, which criminalizes "willfully" failing to

respond to a congressional subpoena. Bannon insists that "will fully" should be interpreted to require bad faith and argues that his noncompliance does not qualify because his lawyer advised him not to respond to the subpoena. This court, however, has squarely held that "willfully" in Section 192 means only that the defendant deliberately and intentionally refused to comply with a congressional subpoena, and that this exact "advice of counsel" defense is no defense at all. See Licavoli v. United States, 294 F.2d 207, 207 (D.C. Cir. 1961). As both this court and the Supreme Court have repeatedly explained, a contrary rule would contravene the text of the contempt statute and hamstring Congress's investigatory authority.Because we have no basis to depart from that binding precedent, and because none of Bannon's other challenges to his convictions have merit, we affirm.

 

Appellate panel already upheld Peter Navarro's conviction.

 

So–a Democrat Congress can defy its own originating legislation related to a special committee; make up a crime; force Americans to comply with requests/subpoenas; use a Dem US Atty to enforce (Bannon was Matthew Graves' first indictment after taking office in Nov 2021); get a quick jury conviction in a 100% Dem city; and get a majority Dem appellate panel to affirm.

 

“Bannon did not comply with the subpoena in any respect. Nor, despite the Committee's warnings, did he submit by October 18 any further information bearing on the Committee's contempt deliberations. On October 19, 2021, the Select Committee informed Bannon that it had unanimously voted to recommend that the House of Representatives find him in contempt of Congress.”

“On November 12, 2021, a grand jury charged Bannon with two counts of violating 2 U.S.C. § 192. Section 192 provides that "[e]very person who having been summoned as a witness by the authority of … any committee of either House of Congress, willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry, shall be deemed guilty" of contempt of Congress.”

 

To be fair,I must point out that Bannon's judge was Trump appointee Carl Nichols–who, aside from being the only judge to dismiss 1512c2 resulting in Fischer, hasn't been much better than the rest in J6 matters.

 

He refused to allow Bannon to subpoena members/staff of the J6 committee. Remember, folks, immunity only extends to the perps of this lawfare, not the victims.

 

“Finally, Bannon challenges the district court's rulings quashing trial subpoenas that he served on Select Committee members, staffers, counsel, and three House leaders. The district court held that most of the testimony and documents sought were protected by the Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause and that any information not covered by the Clause was irrelevant. Bannon then moved to dismiss, arguing that quashing resulted in a one-sided presentation of evidence that violated his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. The district court, after considering Bannon's detailed proffer, denied his motion because the information Bannon sought was not material to the charges or defenses properly before the jury. We again review the denial of Bannon's motion to dismiss de novo, Yakou, 428 F.3d at 246, and the district court's evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion, Hall, 945 F.3d at 514.”

 

“We conclude that none of the information sought in the trial subpoenaswas relevant to the elements of the contempt offense, nor to any affirmative defense Bannon was entitled to present at trial. We accordingly need not consider whether the Speech or Debate Clause also protects the sought-after information from disclosure.“

 

“As discussed above, Bannon sought to put to the jury several arguments that the district court properly excluded: that the underlying subpoena was invalid because of the political motives of Select Committee members and procedurally flawed based on the Select Committee's composition and Bannon's non-receipt of a copy of Rule 3(b).”

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1788941961946128794.html

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 10:57 a.m. No.20847759   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20847750

What pisses me off they know the J6 Committee was political motivation to destroy Trump for good. And the Republicans could have redone a real J6 committee to eliminate the lies from the first one, but they won’t!

 

No matter how much you hate them, its not enough! Congress hates us all and they prove it daily

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 10:59 a.m. No.20847767   🗄️.is 🔗kun

David Zere: Stormy Daniels Blew It Up For Herself, The Prosecution's Running Out Of Witnesses Here

Today

 

5:19

 

https://rumble.com/embed/v4rvryt/?pub=4

Anonymous ID: 87571d May 10, 2024, 11:12 a.m. No.20847805   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7809

>>20847785

Even Jim Jordan is doing nothing, they are going to have another cadre at the border, to get away from supporting Trump and putting an effort into exposing this conspiracy against Trump. There’s a million others things they can then taking off to the Border. Doesn’t he remember Johnson promised they wouldn’t fund Bidan’s budget unless the border is fixed? Why go there? Performative cowardice