MTG On Congressmen Threatening Kicking Her Off Committees: "Members Of Congress Need To Grow Up"
8:14
https://rumble.com/embed/v4rvrqo/?pub=4
This is such a thorough analysis on how the Fed and Treasury are manipulating the market to try to get Bidan re-elected but they are destroying the economy and middle class and poor are getting poorer. That was never their job to be a political arm of re-electing a president and definitely not loser Joe
Its a shell game and especially under Biden, Yellen and Powell, the economy is manipulated to only help the top 2% now. That was not the case under Trump.
Did you listen to the whole thing?
Basically they recreating the US into a third world country in the most destructive ways possible. We have a Mafia head pretending to be president, and all his hit men enact the destruction of our country.
I don’t understand how leaders, the news etc do not understand this is intentional.
OMG you’ve to watch this (Trump atty Defender) Mike Davis interviewed by BBC on the Stormy case. He calls Stormy a Bimbo and Porn Star on air, it freaks out the woman
Fiery Exchange Between Mike Davis & BBC: This New York Trial Is About Humiliating President Trump
5:43
https://youtu.be/OxqhHEFE9gU
LifeNews.com
@LifeNewsHQ
BREAKING: Robert Kennedy Jr. endorses abortions up to birth.
"Even if it's full term."
https://lifenews.com/2024/05/09/ro
10:58 AM · May 9, 2024
https://x.com/LifeNewsHQ/status/1788584306085859631
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. endorses unrestricted abortion ‘even if it’s full term’
By Peter Pinedo
May 9, 2024 / 17:25 pm
Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has endorsed completely unrestricted abortion “even if it’s full term.”
“My belief is that we should leave it to the woman, we shouldn’t have government involved,” Kennedy said on an episode of “The Sage Steele Show” aired on Wednesday.
Steele, who is a Catholic, pressed Kennedy further on whether he holds this position for the entirety of pregnancy, saying that “as a Catholic that definitely is a concern with many practicing Catholics.”
Kennedy responded by confirming that he would leave the decision to the pregnant woman “even if it’s full term.”
“I don’t think it’s ever OK,” Kennedy added. “I think we should do everything in our power to make sure that never happens, everything that we can do. But I think ultimately, nobody sets out to do that and there are always some kind of extenuating circumstances that would make a mother make that kind of choice, a terrible, terrible choice which is, you know, you can’t overstate how bad that is, but ultimately, I think we have to trust the woman.”
He admitted that he believes “there is a very good argument that the state has an interest in protecting a fully formed fetus,” but went on to say: “I come down to the fact that I don’t trust the state and I think we need to trust the woman.”
Kennedy’s running mate, Nicole Shanahan, a tech entrepreneur and health activist, meanwhile, was surprised by this stance, saying in another episode of “The Sage Steele Show” that unrestricted abortion until birth “is not Bobby’s position as I understand it.”
“My understanding is that he absolutely believes in limits on abortion, and we’ve talked about this,” Shanahan said, adding: “I don’t know where that came from.”
Stefanie Spear, a spokesperson for Kennedy’s campaign, confirmed with CNA that though Kennedy believes “late-term abortions are horrifying,” he “believes the mother has the final say, and moral responsibility, in such decisions.”
Spear also confirmed that if elected president, Kennedy, like Biden,would support efforts to “codify” Roe v. Wade by passing a federal law to overrule state pro-life measures.
She said that this legislation “is needed to protect body autonomy.”
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/257643/rfk-jr-endorses-unrestricted-abortion-even-if-its-full-term
(This is how stupid Mike Johnson and the Republican Congress is! They believed the IC Agencies)
Top FBI Official Urges Agents to Use Warrantless Wiretaps on US Soil
An internal email from FBI deputy director Paul Abbate, obtained by WIRED, tells employees to search for “US persons” in a controversial spy program’s database that investigators have repeatedly misused.
By Dell Cameron and William Turton
May 8, 2024 1:48 PM
A top FBI official is encouraging employees to continue to investigate Americans using a warrantless foreign surveillance program in an effort to justify the bureau’s spy powers, according to an internal email obtained by WIRED.
Known as Section 702, the program is controversial for having been misused by the FBI to target US protesters, journalists, and even a sitting member of Congress. US lawmakers, nevertheless, voted to extend the program in April for an additional two years, while codifying a slew of procedures that the FBI claims is working to stop the abuse.
Obtained by WIRED, an April 20 email authored by FBI deputy director Paul Abbate to employees states: “To continue to demonstrate why tools like this are essential to our mission, we need to use them, while also holding ourselves accountable for doing so properly and in compliance with legal requirements.” [Emphasis his.]
Added Abbate: “I urge everyone to continue to look for ways to appropriately use US person queries to advance the mission, with the added confidence that this new pre-approval requirement will help ensure that those queries are fully compliant with the law.”
“The deputy director's email seems to show that the FBI is actively pushing for more surveillance of Americans, not out of necessity but as a default,” says US representative Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat from California. “This directly contradicts earlier assertions from the FBI during the debate over Section 702’s reauthorization.”
Following publication, FBI spokesperson Susan McKee provided a statement from the bureau that mischaracterized WIRED's reporting, inaccurately claiming it “alleged that that the FBI instructed its employees to violate the law or FBI policies.” The statement added that Abbate's email “emphasized Congress’ recognition of the vital importance of FISA Section 702 to protect the American people and was sent to ensure that FBI personnel were immediately aware of, and in compliance with, the privacy enhancing changes the law has put in place.”
Authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), the 702 program permits the government to enlist American companies to eavesdrop on a variety of communications—calls, texts, emails, and possibly other forms of messaging—all without the need for a search warrant. The key requirement for the program is that at least one of the recipients (the individual “targeted”) be a foreigner reasonably believed to be somewhere other than on US soil.
In a statement to Congress last year, FBI director Christopher Wray emphasized that the bureau’s focus was on “dramatically reducing” the number of times its agents scoured the 702 database for information on Americans.
The frequency with which the FBI runs US phone numbers or email accounts through the 702 database is hazy. The bureau first began reporting the figure publicly in 2021, releasing the total number of times that these searches took place. That number was 2.9 million. Since then, the FBI has “updated its counting methodology” to count only unique searches. (To wit, running the same phone number through the database multiple times a year now counts as a single search.) As a result, at least in part, the number dropped to 119,383 the following year. In 2023, under more stringent guidelines, it dropped further, to 57,094.
https://www.wired.com/story/fbi-section-702-us-person-queries-email/
Hey but Congress made sure the FBI didn’t spy on them. They were exempted.
Is there anything Johnson will not allow him and Congress to be scammed by? Anything? He believes what Joe says, the Dems say, the IC say, the Fed Agencies. He’s taken in all the time
Bongino had Johnson on his show, when Dan said they would use it against Americans.Johnson said, Oh no they can’t do that!(That’s how stupid Mike is)
Go to about 37:47Dan repeats the clip, and he assures him it can’t happen.
(The entire show today was great, the left is getting bumbed out and losing)
May 10, 2024 Bongino show
https://rumble.com/embed/v4ruehl/?pub=4
Fisa discussion with Bongino and Johnson starts at 46:44 not 47:00
Can an anon do a clip from Johnson interview to the end of FISA discussion including the Wired Article? Thx
Dan says on the show today Secret Service is really messed up and they are going to get someone killed one day.He’s particularly concerned about Trump because the death threats are off the charts. He said to read this article.
Susan Crabtree: Agent's Outburst Highlights Low Morale and Staff Shortages in Secret Service
RCP correspondent Susan Crabtree discusses her new piece reporting details about a fight between agents on the Secret Service detail of Vice President Kamala Harriswith Andrew Walworth on Thursday's edition of the RealClearPolitics radio show.
SUSAN CRABTREE: It's quite a sad and bizarre story. It appears that the woman was acting erratically and there was an incident where she grabbed another senior leader's cell phone and was deleting apps and then she was yelling at people. And so the senior, it's called the senior agent in charge of the the detail that day, told her she was relieved for duty that day that she didn't appear to be able to do the job.
And then she snapped, according to my sources, and basically tackled the senior agent in charge and started punching him.
My sources tell me that she was armed, the firearm was in her in the holster, and they were concerned about it when she was wrestling the, her senior officer. So they restrained her and took her gun away from her before she was carted out of the terminal at Joint Base Andrews.
ANDREW WALWORTH:What does that say about the hiring process, or the vettingprocess for these Secret Service agents?
SUSAN CRABTREE: My sources tell me that's what's on the top of their mind right now. There has been as, you know since 2014 when we had a series of fence-jumpers and issues with prostitutes in Colombia, the agents were embroiled, they got forced out. There has been a series of scandals that were really at its apex in around 2014 to 2016. It's been sort of mild lately, but this issue is raising concerns because, since that issueback and during the Obama administration, there has been a staff shortage.
Secret Service agents have been leaving the agencybecause they've been overly stressed over many overtime hours, and there's better pay at other agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Air Marshal Service.
So there's been a flight out of the agency, there are morale problems and what I have long reported on, aculture of corruption in the Secret Service that is, is contributed to low morale.
So there's a feeling that there was a shortage in the workforce and sothey might have lowered their standards and also a big push for diversity, equity, and inclusion in the Secret Service. You can see it on their website, they have a whole section on the way that they are promoting women and people of color and making sure that LGBTQ+ members of their workforce are treated fairly.
ANDREW WALWORTH: What happens next do you think?
SUSAN CRABTREE: She is on medical leave is what I've, I've been told by the Secret Service, they put out a statement confirming that the incident did indeed occur, but I don't know, they will not say whether she is this is being investigated and she will be removed from the protective detail. One would assume that she would be, it appears to be a mental health issue. But theconcern among the Secret Service community is that we cannot be having DEI hires, those issues cannot supersede competence. And in this case, certainly mental stability.
What was her background? Why didn't they do a more extensive background check? And if they did, they would have found that this woman sued the Dallas Police Department for gender discrimination.
I talked to Ron Kessler, who is an authority on the Secret Service and has written several books about it, an investigative reporter, and he said that that would have been a disqualifying black mark on her record – if she had sued and the case was dismissed for gender discrimination at another police department, that would be disqualifying for her hiring for the Secret Service.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/04/26/susan_crabtree_agents_outburst_highlights_low_morale_and_staff_shortages_in_secret_service.html
NEW: Secret Service Whistleblowers Calling for Action Over Vulnerability to 'Potential Insider Threats'
Nick Arama9:45 AM on May 10, 2024
Bloomberg's White House reporter Jennifer Jacobs dropped some concerning news on Thursday without any further elaboration.
News: There's a petition circulating inside the US Secret Service that flags concerns about "a number of recentSecret Service incidents indicative of inadequate training," a double standard in disciplinary actions, and avulnerability "to potential insider threats" that could pose a risk to US nat sec. It was first shared Monday,
I'm told, and has39 signaturesso far. Aim is to call for a congressional investigation, petition says.
Real Clear Politics reporter Susan Crabtree then confirmed the petition and revealed what it was about.
The petition calls for an investigationby the House Oversight Committee and theremoval of Kimberly Cheatle as the Secret Service director. It raises issues about DEIhiring superseding training and creating security issues. Whistleblowers are calling for the same type of investigation into the Secret Service that the House Judiciary just started into the FBI.
Crabtree pointed back to the incident with the agent on Kamala Harris' team, in which the agent began acting erratically and punching her superior. Concerns had been raised about her hiring and alleged DEI practices.
Obviously, this raises deep and immediate questions, not just about the safety of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris,but all Secret Service protectees, including former President Donald Trump, if you have issues involving the agents. What I find particularly disturbing in this report is the "vulnerability to potential insider threats" that Jacobs talks about. Is that talking about a specific threat?
Because it sure sounds like the whistleblowers have a concernthere that could implicate national security. And given how agencies seem to have become inundated by politics and leftists, and the animosity going into this election, that does not make me feel confident.
House Oversight needs to take an immediate look into this to ensure the safety of everyone involved and not just send a "strongly worded letter" hoping that someone answers in the next couple of months.
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/05/10/secret-service-danger-n2174003#google_vignette
Whoever that anon here that made up the phrase “strongly worded letter”, should be famous and anonymous. I remember reading that phrase here years ago 2017-18 I think
“ensure the safety of everyone involved andnot just send a "strongly worded letter" hoping that someone answers in the next couple of months.”