>>2085820

>running as happening yesterday but it happened in 2015

this is exactly what happened yesterday with that story about the women setting her husband on fire for raping their daughter, the story was from 2015 but one single source reposted it like it was trending news and the chans went wild with it like it was new.

i pointed out it was old and fake and they ignored me,

so this has happened again today, a clear trend, is this how they will distract us now? recycling old news?

>>2085944

what?! no delete, no. im agreeing with you!

what youve posted is notable!

im pointing out that it also happened yesterday with a different article.

im saying you are right and (they) are doing this.