test

>>2085212

This one? https://pastebin.com/w3Duc7Y2

>>2085318

Swinging from thread to thread, one never gets lost.

For the lost, there's https://8ch.net/qresearch/index.html

>>2085336

>>2085360

Anons have written better, anons are capable of writing this, doesn't have to be Q. Give yourselves & anons more credit. And, that post was posted more than once, Q wouldn't try that hard to get our attention

>>2085265

> this very Q sounding Anon post:

Did you really consider how this statement would be taken prior to posting it?

Looks like on sneaked in

[ID: a6ce79}

2 posts so far of IGNORE

>>2085561

>>2085651

How this post was born:

CTRL+C

CTRL+V

>>2085711

>>2085723

>>2085741

>Why is that so hard to believe?

Because we're not here to "believe", this isn't X-files research. Where's your sauce? Prove it a fact.

>>2085821

Lurked & remained silent for most of the day. As such, I see more of a pattern than you have with me in this one bread, watching these same questions & topics come up by <5 post IP hoppers. One of the beautiful benefits of lurking. Call me a slide, for calling out slides, that's fine too. I could just remain silent & let the board be dominated like it has been the last few days, or i can fight back ¯_(ツ)_/¯

>>2085845

I get where you're coming from, however, look at this from a normie perspective. Once you tell someone that we are learning from ETI, EVEN IF it were true, does that gain, or lose their attention?