TYB
how goes the morn, for you?
hope you keep that at bay, bakes
going to take a nap and try and be here before 5 for the rally..
https://www.contrabandcures.com
772
Q !UW.yye1fxo 02/15/2018 15:02:33 ID:
8chan/greatawakening: 96
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/95mkultra.pdf
Read very carefully.
Unreleased [CLAS-HIGHEST]:
Ability to use frequencies [incoming sig]/modify/code/program over 'x' period [designate] mobile phone to 'control' target subject.
OP conducted/ORIG outside of US.
CAR control?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yqa5PUViPo
Statement by the driver?
Fairytale?
AS THE WORLD TURNS.
THIS IS BIGGER THAN ANYONE CAN IMAGINE.
Q
page 171
QKHILLTOP DEFINITION
QKHILLTOP was a cryptonym assigned in 1954 to a project to study Chinese
Communist brainwashing techniques and' to develop interrogation techniques.
Most of the early studies are believed to have been conducted by the Cornell
University Medical School Huipan Ecology Study Programs. The effort was
absorbed into the MKULTRA program and the QKHILLTOP cryptonym became
obsolete. The Society for the investigation of Human Ecology, later the Human
Ecology Fund, was an outgrowth of the QKHILLTOP.
ecovered documents fall roughly into three categories:
First, there are 149 MKULTRA subprojects, many of which appear to have
some connection with research into behavioral modification, drug acquisition
and testing or administering drugs surreptitiously.
Second, there are two boxes of miscellaneous MKULTRA papers, including
audit reports and financial statements from "cut-out" (i.e., intermediary)
funding mechanisms used to conceal CIA's sponsorship of various research
projects.
Finally, there are 33 additional subprojects concerning certain intelligence
activities previously funded under MKULTRA which have nothing to do
either with behavioral modification, drugs, and toxins or with any other re-
lated matters.
We have attempted to group the activities covered by the 149 subprojects into
categories under descriptive headings. In broad outline, at least, this presents the
contents of these files.
The activities are placed in the following 15 categories:
6
-
Research into the effects of behavioral drugs and/or alcohol:
17 subprojects probably not involving human testing;
14 subprojects definitely involving tests on human volunteers;
19 subprojects probably including tests on human volunteers. While not
known, some of these subprojects may have included tests on unwitting sub-
jects as well;
6 subprojects involving tests on unwitting subjects.
-
Research on hypnosis: 8 subprojects, including 2 involving hypnosis and drugs
in combination.'
-
Acquisition of chemicals or drugs: 7 subprojects.
-
Aspects of magicians' art useful in covert operatibns: e.g., surreptitious de-
livery of drug-related materials: 4 subprojects.
-
Studies of human behavior, sleep research, and behavioral changes during
psychotherapy: 9 subprojects.
-
Library searches and attendance at seminars and international conferences
on behavioral modification: 6 subprojects.
-
Motivational studies, studies of defectors, assessment, and training tech-
niques: 23 subprojects.
-
Polygraph research : 3 subprojects.
-
Funding mechanisms for MKULTRA external research activities: 3
subprojects.
-
Research on drugs, toxins, and biologicals in human tissue; provision of
exotic pathogens and the capability to incorporate them in effective delivery
systems: 6 subprojects.
-
Activities whose objectives cannot be determined from available documen-
tation : 3 subprojects.
-
Subprojects involving funding support for unspecified activities connected
with the Army's Special Operations Division at Ft. Detrick, Md. This activity is
outline in Book I of the Church Oommittee Report, pp. 388-389. (See Appendix A,
pp. 68-69. Under CIA's Project MKNAOMI, the Army Assisted CIA in develop-
ing, testing, and maintaining biological agents and delivery systems for use
against humans as well as against animals and crops. The objectives of these
subprojects cannot be identified from the recovered material beyond the fact
that the money was to be used where normal funding channels would require
more written or oral justification than appeared desirable for security reasons
or where operational considerations dictated short lead times for purchases. About
$11,000 was involved during this period 1953-1960: 3 subprojects.
-
Single subprojects in such areas as effects of electro-shock, harassment tech-
niques for offensive use, analysis of extrasensory perception, gas propelled sprays
and aerosols, and four subprojects involving crop and material sabotage.
-
One or two subprojects on each of the following:
"Blood Grouping" research, controlling the activity of animals, energy
storage and transfer in organic systems; and
stimulus and response in biological systems.
-
Three subprojects cancelled before any work was done on them having to
do with laboratory drug screening, research on brain concussion, and research
on biologically active materials to be tested through the skin on human volunteers.
Now, as to how much new the recovered material adds to what has previously
been reported to the Church Committee and to Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee
on Health on these topics, the answer is additional detail, for the most part: e.g.,
the names of previously unidentified researchers and institutions associated on
either a witting or unwitting basis with MKULTRA activities, and the names of
CIA officials who approved or monitored the various subprojects. Some new sub-
stantive material is also present: e.g., details concerning proposals for experi-
mentation and clinical testing associated with various research projects, and a
possibly improper contribution by CIA to a private institution. However, the
principal types of activities included have, for the most part, either been outlined
to some extent or generally described in what was previously available to CIA
in the way of documentation and was supplied by CIA to Senate investigators.
For example:
Financial disbursement records for the period 1960-1964 for 76 of the 149
numbered MKULTRA subprojects had been recovered from the Office of Finance
by CIA and were made available to the Church Committee investigators in August
or September 1975.
The 1963 Inspector General report on MKULTRA made available to both the
Church Committee and Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee mentions electro-sho
Meet Fani Willis' GOP challenger for the top prosecutor job in deep-blue Georgia
No Republican has run for the office of district attorney in Fulton County in 30 years
Embattled Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis is facing a GOP challenger in the race for her post as district attorney this November, the first time a Republican has sought the office in more than two decades.
Courtney Kramer, an Atlanta-based attorney, is likely to face Willis in November, assuming Willis defeats her one Democratic primary challenger, which she is expected to do.
Kramer says she is running for office "because the citizens in Fulton County deserve someone who is going to fight for their safety, restore integrity and public confidence back into the office and advocate at the highest level for justice.
"Right now, we do not have a district attorney who is doing her job and, instead, victims are being languished and justice is being delayed for not just the victims, but their families, as well. Fulton County deserves an ethical, moral and honest DA who is committed to the job and the will of the people," Kramer told Fox News Digital.
Willis has come under significant scrutiny for her handling of the sweeping racketeering case against former President Trump related to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
Trump and his co-defendents' bid to have Willis disqualified from the case is before the Georgia Court of Appeals. Willis was accused of having an "improper" affair with Nathan Wade, a special prosecutor she hired in her election interference case against Trump.
After days of hearings, a Georgia judge said Willis could stay on the case but only after Wade was removed. Willis is also under investigation by Georgia state legislature committees.
Kramer, an associate at the Katz Legal Group in Atanta, also worked in the Office of White House Counsel in the Trump administration in 2019. She said Willis "has made a mockery of the legal profession and the judiciary."
"Using her position to pursue political prosecution is not part of the oath you take when you become DA," Kramer said.
"The job of the district attorney is to ensure safety in the community, put criminals away and make sure victims are being advocated for. Here, Willis is not zealously advocating for the people of Fulton County, she’s zealously advocating for herself," Kramer said.
Kramer said she would have to recuse herself from the Trump litigation due to her own conflict of interest, having worked with co-defendants in the case.
Kramer says Willis "cannot discern when she has a conflict of interest."
And Kramer added that if she's elected, she plans to "immediately analyze the backlog of cases and figure out where our resources are going and where they are most needed."
"Transparency and accountability are needed now more than ever, and I hope to give that to the citizens of Fulton County," she said.
Kramer's bid is considered a long shot. Fulton County is a notoriously Democratic stronghold. Trump won only 26% of the vote in 2020.
But she is hopeful the tide will turn.
"This should not be about right versus left but about right versus wrong," she said.
Willis did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/meet-fani-willis-gop-challenger-for-the-top-prosecutor-spot-in-deep-blue-georgia
Wendell Husebø
@WendellHusebo
The Speaker, in some of his earliest public comments after Democrats saved his gavel, refused to make any attempt to defund Smith’s office as it continues its prosecutions of Trump.
“That’s not something you wave a wand and just eliminate the special counsel as a provision,” Johnson told Politico. “There is a necessity for a function like that, because sometimes the Department of Justice — which is an executive branch agency — can’t necessarily, without a conflict of interest, investigate or prosecute the president who’s their boss, or the president’s family.”
When asked straightforwardly if he would write language eliminating Smith’s job into appropriations bills, Johnson replied “no.”
May 09, 2024, 4:24 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@WendellHusebo/posts/112413002143948679
Marco Polo
@MarcoPolo501c3
Matthew Byron Colangelo
DOB: 7/28/1974
NY SBN: 4228797
Our piece on Colangelo from 50 weeks ago reads just as true today—The (Legal) Closer from the (DOJ) Bullpen targeting @realDonaldTrump:
2:23
https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/f/9/Y/K/f9YKq.caa.mp4
Mar 26, 2024, 12:28 AM
https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-legal-closer-from-the-doj-bullpen
Matt Colangelo: The (Legal) Closer Matt Colangelo from the (DOJ) Bullpen
Matt Colangelo channeled his inner Lavrentiy Beria.
APR 05, 2023
To put it simply: Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg showed his prosecutor Matt Colangelo the man (DJT), & Colangelo showed [read: created] Bragg the "crime." Colangelo was called in from Merrick Garland's DOJ to lead the prosecution against Trump. Even the New York Times understood his role & was completely upfront about it:

NYT story (12/05/2022)
Today, Colangelo delivered for his superiors—and got a good seat to take it in. Here is Colangelo at the prosecutors' table (fittingly) on the far-left:

Photo by Andrew Kelly
A word about this piece's subtitle … Michael Henry wrote the following in The Oxford Eagle: "Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin's reign of terror in Russia and Eastern Europe, bragged that he could prove criminal conduct on anyone, even the innocent. 'Show me the man and I'll show you the crime' was Beria's infamous boast. He served as deputy premier from 1941 until Stalin's death in 1953, supervising the expansion of the gulags and other secret detention facilities for political prisoners. … Beria targeted 'the man' first, then proceeded to find or fabricate a crime. Beria's modus operandi was to presume the man guilty, and fill in the blanks later. By contrast, under the United States Constitution, there's a presumption of innocence that emanates from the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments, as set forth in Coffin vs. U.S. (1895)."

Lavrentiy Beria (left) with Joseph Stalin
A quick primer:
Name: Matthew "Matt" Byron Colangelo
DOB: July 28, 1974
Education: State Area College High School (PA), Harvard College, & Harvard Law School (2002)
Work history: Management Consultant at Bain & Company in Boston, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the DOJ, Chief of Staff to Department of Labor Secretary Tom Perez, Executive Deputy Attorney General for Social Justice under disgraced NY AG Eric Schneiderman, & Associate Attorney General at the DOJ (acting), among others
NY State Bar #: 4228797
Work email (which U.S. federal taxpayers foot the bill for, in part): colangelom@dany.nyc.gov
Wife: Anne Kimball Small (Anniversary: September 16, 2011) is the former General Counsel of the Securities & Exchange Commission and former member of the White House Counsel's office under Obama; graduated from Yale (1996) & Harvard Law School (2001)

Former DNC Chair & Secretary of Labor Tom Perez & Colangelo, Perez's then-Chief of Staff (07/23/13)

The so-called "fat Al" DA of Manhattan, Alvin Bragg

Photo by Dave Sanders (04/04/2023)
We will have more on the other apparatchik from Bragg's office (Meg Reiss) & her husband (Simon Freakley) in short order.
–Garrett Ziegler
Founder
https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-legal-closer-from-the-doj-bullpen
Marco Polo
@MarcoPolo501c3
Yale Architect on Drury Client List
Peter de Bretteville: John #6 of 121
Marco Polo continues its exposure of the "accidentally" released list of johns who contributed to the horrific Larry Ray sex cult. Many of the biggest names in the mainstream press & conservative media have the list, but Marco Polo & Inner City Press are the only entities brave enough to actually post the names on the list. There is a lot of shouting (justifiably, we believe) about the failure of law enforcement to disclose the Epstein and/or Maxwell client lists; however, the Larry Ray sex cult client list IS public, & more people should be talking about it & demanding accountability. We are. In fact, we are creating flyers for every single person on the list that we can identify beyond a reasonable doubt (the highest standard). So, we bring to you a degenerate architect named Peter de Bretteville …
https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/peterdebrettevillejohn6of121
Caio Fonseca:
John #4 of 121
Fonseca's maternal grandfather was Jacob Kaplan, the former owner of Welch's grape juice.
MAY 01, 2024
41
Share
Marco Polo continues its exposure of the "accidentally" released list of johns who contributed to the horrific Larry Ray sex cult. Many of the biggest names in the mainstream press & conservative media have the list, but Marco Polo & Inner City Press are the only entities brave enough to actually post the names. We are creating flyers for every single person on the list that we can identify beyond a reasonable doubt (the highest standard). So, we bring to you modern "artist" Caio Fonseca …
https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/caio-fonseca-john-4-of-121
A. BAKER
@ABB0377
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/select-subcommittee-on-the-coronavirus
Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Goes RICO
Fauci is now downrange in their sights and getting closer. Hope springs eternal.
May 11, 2024, 2:59 AM
https://truthsocial.com/@ABB0377/posts/112421158740163886
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act: U.S. law
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.
To the great disappointment of many (including myself), the US House of Representatives’ Committee on Oversight and Accountability, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic appears to be focusing the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and and the increasingly apparent cover up of the role of the Wuhan Institute of Virology acting in cooperation with EcoHealth Alliance to perform gain of function bat coronavirus research, as well as the extended network of EcoHealth Alliance collaborators, cooperators, and enablers. The good news is that the committee is starting to behave like a federal investigator seeking to root out a corrupt organization via a RICO-like investigation strategy.
However, at this point a key question remains; how far down the rabbit hole are they willing to go? And will their investigations remain focused on just NIH, or will they look into the role of DoD/DTRA, CIA, USAID, and other related federal organizations?
A typical RICO investigation strategy involves a multi-faceted approach, combining various techniques to gather evidence and build a strong case against a targeted organization or individual. Key components of a Rico investigation strategy include:
Close Cooperation between Investigators and Prosecutors: RICO investigations require close coordination between law enforcement agencies and prosecutors to ensure a thorough and effective investigation. This collaboration enables investigators to share information, resources, and expertise, ultimately leading to a stronger case.
Identifying and Gathering Evidence: RICO investigators focus on gathering evidence that demonstrates the existence of a criminal enterprise, as well as the involvement of individual members in the organization. This may involve reviewing financial records, phone records, and other documentation, as well as conducting interviews and surveillance.
Building a Strong Case: RICO investigations aim to build a strong case by establishing a clear link between the criminal enterprise and the individual members involved. This may involve demonstrating the organization’s involvement in illegal activities, such as money laundering, extortion, or fraud.
Following on the heels of the grilling of Dr. Peter Dazak on 01 May 2024, in which he asserted that there is no credible evidence that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in the general human population was the product of a laboratory accident, the committee has now released a statement to the effect that a classified State Department situation analysis memorandum concludes exactly the opposite, and furthermore that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was the source of the virus and that the Chinese Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) was deeply involved in the WIV.
Suffice to say, Dr. Dazak continues on track to be the ideal “fall guy” for a US Government intent on evading joint responsibility for one of the most massively bungled and colossally tragic public health events in modern history. Dazak is not a US citizen, is extremely well connected to all the right people (including WEF leaders, WHO, Wellcome Trust, and Bill Gates), has an unrivaled sense of entitlement, and is both transparently dishonest and completely unrepentant for the role which he and his organization (EcoHealth Alliance) played in the genesis of the COVIDcrisis.
The Committee did its homework prior to bringing Dr. Dazak in for his opportunity to come clean, including interviewing UNC coronavirus researcher Dr. Ralph Baric (who helped develop and has actively defended use of Remdesivir for COVID). Unfortunately for Dr. Dazak, Dr. Baric’s testimony clearly indicated that the work performed at WIV on bat coronaviruses constituted “gain of function” research. This position directly contradicts the sworn assertions of his prior collaborator Dr. Dazak, a key point repeatedly reiterated and reinforced by Committee members questioning Dazak, who repeatedly disagreed with Dr. Baric. First interrogate the smaller fish, then work up to the bigger ones. Classic RICO strategy.
Only two days later, on April 22, 2024, Dr. Morens’s attorney followed this exact plan and told Select Subcommittee staff that Dr. Morens was “unavailable” to appear for a public hearing on the offered date of May 7, 2024. The attorney provided four alternative dates — all of which Dr. Morens and his team seemingly understood to be unacceptable given the public Congressional and Select Subcommittee schedule.
Dr. Morens’s evasion of public testimony “appears to be a poorly veiled attempt to protect Dr. Fauci, insulate him from the actions the Select Subcommittee is investigating, and obstruct the Select Subcommittee’s investigation,” wrote Chairman Wenstrup in a subpoena cover letter to Dr. Morens.
This is the second subpoena the Select Subcommittee has announced for Dr. David Morens. The first subpoena compelled Dr. Morens to produce documents from his personal email account(s) related to the origins of COVID-19 after repeated allegations that he violated federal records keeping laws.
Read the Select Subcommittee’s cover letter here and subpoena here.
Background:
In June 2023, the Select Subcommittee released a batch of emails in which Dr. Morens appears to hide COVID-19 information. Dr. Morens wrote, “I always try to communicate over gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d constantly” and “I will delete anything I don’t want to see in the New York Times.”
After receiving a letter from the Select Subcommittee detailing Dr. Morens’s potential federal records violation, the NIH placed him on administrative leave.
In October 2023, Chairman Wenstrup announced a subpoena for NIH records related to Dr. Morens’s potential federal records violation. NIH conducted an internal investigation into Dr. Morens’s suspicious actions but refused to share relevant findings with the American people or Congress.
In November 2023, EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak appeared for a transcribed interview — during which he called Dr. Morens a “mentor.”
In December 2023, Dr. Morens was scheduled to appear for a transcribed interview. The Department of Health and Human Services derailed the transcribed interview after they prohibited Dr. Morens from answering any questions about the origins of COVID-19.
In January 2024, Dr. Morens appeared for a transcribed interview — after which Chairman Wenstrup vowed to receive access to Dr. Morens’s personal email account. Key takeaways from the transcribed interview can be found here.
In April 2024, the Select Subcommittee revealed new information from a whistleblower that appeared to provide further evidence of Dr. Morens intentionally subverting federal transparency laws to shield discussions related to the origins of COVID-19. The next day, EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak released four document tranches that confirmed the whistleblower’s allegations.
Also in April 2024, Chairman Wenstrup announced the first subpoena to Dr. Morens that compelled him to produce documents from his personal email account(s) related to the origins of COVID-19.
you're missing driver and tequila, ya lousy tendy
what the fuck is this?
silly bitches