Anonymous ID: 52ca96 May 11, 2024, 11:52 a.m. No.20852820   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2853 >>2855

>>20852593 pb

Why was it automatically assumed Trump was "in it for himself" "a phony" "power-crazy"

because they are blocked from admitting that a powerful person could be good or self-made

Their assumptions.

Since they are all comped.

It's a cliche "Power Corrupts absolutely"

If you say it's not always true, they think you are naive - from the hinterland, since they all know they themselves are sold out.

No one they know is outside their circles of corruption - so they disbelieve such a thing exists.

Since Trump is an outsider they project all the evil about themselves onto him.

They are complacent in "It's always been this way. It will always be this way"

Anonymous ID: 52ca96 May 11, 2024, 1:03 p.m. No.20853048   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3054 >>3060 >>3234

>>20852885

Shamash was a Sun God, made into a Demon when another culture conquered ("Romans" "Normans"?)

They conquerors would turn the God-name of the natives into the name of a Demon.

 

Reading up on scholarship around "Shamash" led me to Issac Newton's revision of Chronology of History.

problems with dating "Shamash" and history around the same, revolve around dating of eclypses. Since the official chronology is wrong, the eclypses will never line up where people think they should be.

Newton worked on the problem of historical revision (resolving time line to logic) for forty years.

Anonymous ID: 52ca96 May 11, 2024, 1:36 p.m. No.20853169   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3234

>>20853054

seems like the same name, but โ€ฆ. all this needs a lot more work.

If a name is spoken, then it might be put down differently in Roman Letters?

It was all explained to me, but I'm not good enough to explain it along back to you.

all this, needs a whole lot moar work.

 

the eagle emblem (at the left above; supposedly Shamash emblem) is similar to the work that appears over the door to the Temple of Dendur at the Met museum .

I've long thought the Temple itself was fakery.

The "temple" fails to match an important early painting of it supposedly drawn on site? They've shown that painting, which glaringly mismatches the object on display , on the cover of a MET publication.

Scale totally wrong.

can't find the pic i was looking for though

Anonymous ID: 52ca96 May 11, 2024, 2:18 p.m. No.20853351   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3368

>>20853322

flaunting it and close to zero persons suspect a thing, at least right away

Things are now changing.

 

'Just like a bad Special Effect"

 

"completly in one side and out the other"

"It just disappeared, like a bad special effect."

[revelation of the method?]?

 

"INCOMPREHENSIBLE", is the trigger word.

it's suggesting that you will fail to understand what you see ; which is true!

Or becomes true.

See how they direct your attention?

 

INCOMPREHENSIBLEthey tell you.

It's a hypnotic suggestion!

Anonymous ID: 52ca96 May 11, 2024, 2:41 p.m. No.20853475   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3490 >>3527

>>20852837

bluebeam" means it was a projection into the sky.

Not really from the Sun.

There's a lot we fail to know about modern tech, so whereas I believe the Wind from the Sun really created the Aurora they people saw.

I'm open minded if there's proof that it was threatre, done with High Tech. And faked images of the Sun with the Sun spots.