HAPPY GIANT VAGINA IN THE SKY DAY
OHHHH NO…. YOU FUCKING DIDN'T!
NG whistleblower: Trump was 'divested' as Commander-in-Chief on Jan. 6
Story by Katelyn Caralle, U.S. Political Reporter For Dailymail.Com In Washington, Dc
Col. Earl Matthews says Army leaders stripped Trump of authority on January 6
Claims they plotted to balk orders to deploy the National Guard to the Capitol
READ: Ex-Acting Defense Sec. Chris Miller says Jan. 6 panel threatened him
Donald Trump's authority as commander-in-chief was ignored by senior military leadership on January 6, 2021, claims the chief legal advisor for D.C. National Guard on that day.
https://www.msn.com/en-za/news/other/ng-whistleblower-trump-was-divested-as-commander-in-chief-on-jan-6/ar-AA1o68xs
Loudermilk To DC National Guardsmen: 'Who Do You Believe Delayed' Officers' Response To Jan. 6?
Forbes Breaking News
3.02M subscribers
110,614 views Apr 27, 2024
At a House Administration Committee hearing prior to the Congressional recess, Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) spoke to witnesses, including D.C. Capitol Guard officers, about what may have contributed to delays in response to the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot.
https://youtu.be/vR8tgDbtSqw?si=Dk1JYSlsjOsMbR4K
National Guard soldiers testify about Jan. 6 response
by: The Hill Staff, The Hill Posted: Apr 18, 2024 / 04:02 PM CDT
Four National Guard soldiers testified Wednesday before the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight about the response to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.
The hearing came as the scope of a federal obstruction law used against scores of Jan. 6 rioters — and former President Trump — drew scrutiny from the Supreme Court Tuesday, a signal that the justices may be wary of the Justice Department’s far-reaching prosecution of the Capitol attack.
Since the Capitol riot, more than 1,300 people have faced charges for their role in the attack.
https://kfor.com/news/insurrection/national-guard-soldiers-testify-about-jan-6-response/
EXCLUSIVE DC National Guard whistleblower claims Trump was stripped of his commander-in-chief powers on January 6
Col. Earl Matthews says Army leaders stripped Trump of authority on January 6
Claims they plotted to balk orders to deploy the National Guard to the Capitol
READ: Ex-Acting Defense Sec. Chris Miller says Jan. 6 panel threatened him
By Katelyn Caralle, U.S. Political Reporter For Dailymail.Com In Washington, Dc
Published: 11:48 EDT, 3 May 2024 | Updated: 12:41 EDT, 3 May 2024
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13372839/DC-National-Guard-whistleblower-claims-Trump-stripped-commander-chief-powers-January-6.html
Joe Morelle Hammers Former President Donald Trump For Not Deploying The National Guard On January 6
Forbes Breaking News
3.02M subscribers
7.2K views 13 days ago
During Wednesday’s House Administration Committee hearing, Rep. Joe Morelle (D-NY) questioned witnesses about the National Guard’s delay on Jan. 6 and what the plan should be going forward.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yChIDPc_yzM
DC Army National Guard Captain Details Leadership ‘Crisis’ That Led To Delay On Jan. 6
Forbes Breaking News
3.02M subscribers
During Wednesday’s House Administration Committee hearing, Captain Timothy Nick gave his opening testimony about his experience on January 6.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei5oSRrGsSw
District of Columbia Army National Guard January 6 Response
Michael Brooks, a senior enlisted officer with the DC National Guard at the time of the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, sharply criticized a Defense Department inspector general’s report on the military response to that day. He and three other men who were members of the DC National Guard on January 6 testified on what they witnessed communications wise among senior military leaders on that day during a public hearing before the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight. The inspector general’s report was released in 2021 and concluded top Pentagon officials responded appropriately to the attack on the Capitol.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?534977-1/district-columbia-army-national-guard-january-6-response
BREAKING: DC National Guard Whistleblowers Testify Before House Admin Committee On January 6 Delays
Forbes Breaking News
3.02M subscribers
187K views 2 weeks ago
On Wednesday, the House Administration Committee held a hearing entitled, “3 Years Later: D.C. National Guard Whistleblowers Speak Out on Jan 6 Delay.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vG-rk6o0W8U
Exclusive: Liz Cheney, January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating Evidence Of Trump’s Push For National Guard
By: Mollie Hemingway
March 08, 2024
https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/08/exclusive-liz-cheney-january-6-committee-suppressed-exonerating-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/
D.C. National Guard Whistleblowers Testify Over J6 Delay
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: Members of the National Guard assist police officers line up as they assist police in dispersing protesters who are gathering at the U.S. Capitol Building on January 06, 2021 in Washington, DC. Pro-Trump protesters entered the U.S. Capitol building after mass demonstrations in the nation's capital during a joint session Congress to ratify President-elect Joe Biden's 306-232 Electoral College win over President Donald Trump. (Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
OAN’s Taylor Tinsley 4:55 PM – Wednesday, April 17, 2024
The Committee on House Administrations Oversight panel met to hear testimonies from whistleblowers on why it took so long for the National Guard to respond to the Capitol on January 6th, 2021.
Lawmakers met for witness testimony in a hearing called “Three Years Later: D.C. National Guard Whistleblowers Speak Out on January 6 Delay” on Wednesday.
Chairman Representative Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) kicked off the hearing by shedding light on a November 2021 report from the Department of Defense’s Acting Inspector General. The report detailed the DOD’s response to January 6th, claiming that the National Guard was deployed as soon as possible.
However, the Georgia Republican said it took three hours and 19 minutes to deploy troops on January 6th after receiving orders.
Those testifying Wednesday included:
Colonel Earl Matthews – Chief Legal Advisor, D.C. Army National Guard
Command Sergeant Major Michael Brooks – Senior Enlisted Officer, D.C. Army National Guard
Captain Timothy Nick – Aide-de-camp, D.C. Army National Guard
Brigadier General Aaron Dean – Adjutant General, D.C. Army National Guard
In regards to the Inspector General’s 2021 report, Loudermilk said the report concludes that the leader of the National Guard response, Maj. Gen. William Walker, received two orders from then U.S. Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy to deploy troops to the Capitol, once at 4:45 pm and again at 5:00 pm.
“Walker denies that either of these calls took place,” Loudermilk said. “Despite the many inconsistencies and contradictions of the DOD’s responsibility that day, the select committee on January 6th ignored these discrepancies despite them being shared privately by their own staff and barreled forward with the DOD’s side of the story.”
The hearing comes after the oversight panel published a never-before released transcribed interview from Trump’s former White House deputy chief of staff Anthony Ornato, which showed that the former president offered 10,000 National troops to secure the Capitol. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D-Washington D.C.), however, rejected the call.
Loudermilk said the now-defunct January select committee withheld Ornato’s “critical witness testimony from the American people because it contradicted their predetermined narrative.”
Colonel Earl Matthews accused two senior officers of the army, Gen. Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt of lying to Congress and federal investigators about why it took so long to deploy the National Guard.
“That DOD IG report is replete with incorrect, false information,” Matthews asserted.
The inspector general blamed the delay on lack of coordination but all witnesses said the National Guard was ready, had the DOD told them to go when they were supposed to.
Matthews sent a memo to the House J6 committee as well as a Senate committee accusing the Army officers of misleading Congress after the 2021 report.
Since coming forward, Matthews hasn’t been promoted. This comes after a promotion board in November 2022 recommended he was one of the “best qualified” group of Army Reserve colonels to be promoted to brigadier general.
He later filed a complaint alleging retaliation for testifying to Congress and asked for those responsible to be reprimanded.
“If public confidence in the integrity of government operations is to be restored,” the complaint said, “he must be made whole and the responsible officials appropriately disciplined.”
Also during Wednesday’s testimony, Command Sgt. Maj. Michael Brooks, said the delay was due to Secretary McCarthy and other officials being more concerned about “optics.”
“I have no idea why we never received that order,” Brooks said. “All I do know is that they were more concerned with what it would look like with soldiers with the Capitol in the background than protecting the Capitol of the united states.”
Loudermilk said the hearing left them with more questions that need to be answered.
https://www.oann.com/newsroom/d-c-national-guard-whistleblowers-testify-over-j6-delay/
but PELOSI did Jan 06 all by her self!
What Phone call?!
General who?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_E._Piatt
and General who?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_A._Flynn
and they did not need "permission" to stop the riot?
and they were ready only 2 miles away?
the pentagon did not like the Optics?
and [MAGA] patriots were involved?
WaPo: Meeting on military response to Trump riot included Mike Flynn's brother
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/wapo-meeting-on-military-response-to-trump-riot-included-mike-flynn-s-brother-99773509543
Who is General Walter Piatt?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_E._Piatt
Who is General Charles Flynn?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_A._Flynn
‘Absolute liars': Ex-D.C. Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6
In a 36-page memo to the Capitol riot committee, Col. Earl Matthews also slams the Pentagon’s inspector general for what he calls an error-ridden report.
A former D.C. National Guard official is accusing two senior Army leaders of lying to Congress and participating in a secret attempt to rewrite the history of the military’s response to the Capitol riot.
In a 36-page memo, Col. Earl Matthews, who held high-level National Security Council and Pentagon roles during the Trump administration, slams the Pentagon’s inspector general for what he calls an error-riddled report that protects a top Army official who argued against sending the National Guard to the Capitol on Jan. 6, delaying the insurrection response for hours.
Matthews’ memo, sent to the Jan. 6 select committee this month and obtained by POLITICO, includes detailed recollections of the insurrection response as it calls two Army generals — Gen. Charles Flynn, who served as deputy chief of staff for operations on Jan. 6, and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, the director of Army staff — “absolute and unmitigated liars” for their characterization of the events of that day. Matthews has never publicly discussed the chaos of the Capitol siege.
On Jan. 6, Matthews was serving as the top attorney to Maj. Gen. William Walker, then commanding general of the D.C. National Guard. Matthews’ memo defends the Capitol attack response by Walker, who now serves as the House sergeant at arms, amplifying Walker’s previous congressional testimony about the hourslong delay in the military’s order for the D.C. National Guard to deploy to the riot scene.
“Every leader in the D.C. Guard wanted to respond and knew they could respond to the riot at the seat of government” before they were given clearance to do so on Jan. 6, Matthews’ memo reads. Instead, he said, D.C. guard officials “set [sic] stunned watching in the Armory” during the first hours of the attack on Congress during its certification of the 2020 election results.
Matthews’ memo levels major accusations: that Flynn and Piatt lied to Congress about their response to pleas for the D.C. Guard to quickly be deployed on Jan. 6; that the Pentagon inspector general’s November report on Army leadership’s response to the attack was “replete with factual inaccuracies”; and that the Army has created its own closely held revisionist document about the Capitol riot that’s “worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist.”
The memo follows Walker’s own public call for the inspector general to retract its detailed report on the events of Jan. 6, as first reported by The Washington Post. Walker told the Post he objected to specific allegations by the Pentagon watchdog that Matthews’ memo also criticizes, calling the inspector general’s report “inaccurate” and “sloppy work.”
The new memo from Matthews, who now serves in the Army reserves, emerges as officials involved in the response that day try to explain their decision-making to investigators. The House select committee has probed the attack for months, and earlier this year top officials testified before the House oversight panel.
Reached for comment, Matthews said the memo he wrote is entirely accurate. “Our Army has never failed us and did not do so on January 6, 2021,” he said. “However, occasionally some of our Army leaders have failed us and they did so on January 6th. Then they lied about it and tried to cover it up. They tried to smear a good man and to erase history.”
Flynn, now the commanding general of the U.S. Army Pacific, and Piatt didn’t respond to messages. Army spokesperson Mike Brady said in a statement that the service’s “actions on January 6th have been well-documented and reported on, and Gen. Flynn and Lt. Gen. Piatt have been open, honest and thorough in their sworn testimony with Congress and DOD investigators.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777
but PELOSI did Jan 06 all by her self!
What Phone call?!
General who?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_E._Piatt
and General who?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_A._Flynn
and they did not need "permission" to stop the riot?
and they were ready only 2 miles away?
the pentagon did not like the Optics?
and [MAGA] patriots were involved?
‘Absolute liars': Ex-D.C. Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6Part II
At the time, Piatt was the director of Army staff, one of the top generals in the Pentagon, and Flynn was the Army’s director of operations. The two men were the highest-ranking Army officials who spoke on the 2:30 call, according to Matthews.
“LTG Piatt stated that it would not be his best military advice to recommend to the Secretary of the Army that the D.C. National Guard be allowed to deploy to the Capitol at that time,” Matthews wrote, adding: “LTGs Piatt and Flynn stated that the optics of having uniformed military personnel deployed to the U.S. Capitol would not be good.”
Piatt and Flynn suggested instead that Guardsmen take over D.C. police officers’ traffic duties so those officers could head to the Capitol, Matthews continues.
In addition to Matthews’ memo, POLITICO also obtained a document produced by a D.C. Guard official and dated Jan. 7 that lays out a timeline of Jan. 6. The D.C. Guard timeline, a separate document whose author took notes during the call, also said that Piatt and Flynn at 2:37 p.m. “recommended for DC Guard to standby,” rather than immediately deploying to the Capitol during the riot.
Four minutes later, according to that Guard timeline, Flynn again “advised D.C. National Guard to standby until the request has been routed” to then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy and then-acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller.
Everyone on the call was “astounded” except Piatt and Flynn, Matthews wrote.
Both men, however, later denied to Congress that they had said the Guard shouldn’t deploy to the Capitol.
In response to a written question from House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) in June about whether Piatt advised anyone in the Guard’s chain of command not to deploy directly to the Capitol, Piatt wrote, “At no point on January 6 did I tell anyone that the D.C. National Guard should not deploy directly to the Capitol.”
That statement, Matthews says in his memo, is “false and misleading.”
Walker also testified to Congress in March that Piatt and Flynn expressed concerns about “optics.”
Further, Flynn told Maloney that he “never expressed a concern about the visuals, image, or public perception of” sending Guardsmen to the Capitol.
That answer, Matthews says in his memo, is “outright perjury.”
Matthews wrote that he and Walker “heard Flynn identify himself and unmistakably heard him say that optics of a National Guard presence on Capitol Hill was an issue for him. That it would not look good. Either Piatt or Flynn mentioned ‘peaceful protestors.’”
Flynn’s brother, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, promulgated a host of conspiracy theories in the lead-up to Jan. 6 and called for former President Donald Trump to impose martial law. Matthews’ memo does not insinuate that Gen. Charles Flynn’s actions on Jan. 6 were shaped by his brother, who has been subpoenaed by the select committee, and does not mention Michael Flynn.
The two generals told the House oversight committee that the Guard wasn’t ready to respond to the chaos that day, and Flynn testified to the House Oversight Committee in June that a “team of over 40 officers and non-commissioned officers immediately worked to recall the 154 D.C. National Guard personnel from their current missions, reorganize them, re-equip them, and begin to redeploy them to the Capitol.” Matthews says that assertion “constituted the willful deception of Congress.”
“If it does not constitute the willful and deliberate misleading of Congress, then nothing does,” Matthews wrote of Flynn’s statement. “Flynn was referring to 154 D.C. Guardsmen who were already on duty, were trained in civil disturbance response, already had area familiarization with Washington, DC, were properly kitted and were delayed only because of inaction and inertia at the Pentagon.”
In other words, Matthews indicates, the idea that it took 40 officers to get 154 National Guard personnel ready to go to the Capitol beggars belief.
Every D.C. Guard leader was desperate to get to the Capitol to help, Matthews writes — then stunned by the delay in deployment. Responding to civil unrest in Washington is “a foundational mission, a statutory mission of the D.C. National Guard,” his memo notes.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777
but PELOSI did Jan 06 all by her self!
What Phone call?!
General who?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_E._Piatt
and General who?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_A._Flynn
and they did not need "permission" to stop the riot?
and they were ready only 2 miles away?
the pentagon did not like the Optics?
and [MAGA] patriots were involved?
WaPo: Meeting on military response to Trump riot included Mike Flynn's brother
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/wapo-meeting-on-military-response-to-trump-riot-included-mike-flynn-s-brother-99773509543
Who is General Walter Piatt?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_E._Piatt
Who is General Charles Flynn?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_A._Flynn
‘Absolute liars': Ex-D.C. Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6Part III
That report states that McCarthy had to call Walker twice on Jan. 6 to order him to deploy the D.C. Guard. Matthews’ memo calls this “an outrageous assertion … as insulting as it is false,” and says McCarthy himself was “incommunicado or unreachable for most of the afternoon.”
The inspector general’s report says McCarthy arrived at the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department at 4:05 p.m., and that “witnesses told us that not having heard from MG Walker regarding any specific plan.” McCarthy and others present, including D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee, themselves drafted a comprehensive plan for the Guard’s deployment, according to the Pentagon watchdog.
The report further says that soon afterward, Miller and Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, reviewed that plan over the phone. Miller authorized the deployment of the D.C. Guard and McCarthy informed Walker of it during a call at 4:35 p.m; McCarthy then held apress conference with the D.C. mayor and called Walker again to reissue the order that he deploy the Guard, according to the Pentagon inspector general.
Matthews challenges that Jan. 6 timetable in his memo. He writes that D.C. Guard leaders “still have not seen this so-called plan developed by McCarthy and allegedly approved by Acting Secretary Miller at 4:32PM.” He adds that the idea that the Army secretary would give Guard personnel support for tactical planning and coordination is “patently absurd.”
Walker, meanwhile, has said no call happened between him and McCarthy at 4:35 p.m. The D.C. Guard’s Jan. 6 timeline — produced while Walker helmed the D.C. National Guard — does not document any phone call between McCarthy and Walker at 4:35.
Both McCarthy and Miller declined to comment.
Megan Reed, a spokesperson for the Pentagon inspector general, said their office stands by its report.
Matthews’ memo also homes in on a document that Army officials have referenced but never fully revealed, titled “Report of the Army’s Operations on January 6 2021.” In Matthews’ view, it lays out a fabricated timeline in a bid to burnish the Army’s reputation.
According to Matthews, Piatt helped produce the document after a series of bruising congressional hearings and news reports that damaged the reputations of Army senior leadership — among them, a Washington Post report that the Army falsely denied Flynn’s participation in the 2:30 p.m. phone call.
“In March 2021, MG Walker was told by a friend that LTG Piatt was so upset with MG Walker that he directed the development of an Army ‘White Paper’ to retell events of 6 January in a light more favorable to LTGs Flynn, Piatt, Secretary McCarthy and the Army Staff,” Matthews writes.
The Army Staff ultimately sought “to create an alternate history which would be the Army’s official recollection of events,” Matthews continues, adding: “The end product, a revisionist tract worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist, was close hold,” kept secret from the public.
But members of Congress have seen the document. Piatt referenced it during a House Oversight Committee hearing in June when asked about conflicting recollections of the afternoon of Jan. 6.
“I would refer to the U.S. Army Report of Operations on January 6 that we submitted to this committee,” Piatt told lawmakers. “What the D.C. National Guard did in those short hours was extraordinary. Now when people’s lives are on the line, two minutes is too long. But we were not positioned to respond to that urgent request. We had to re-prepare so we would send them in prepared for … this new mission.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777
Alex Jones said that he had a "White House Contact" on Jan 06 and during congressional testimony Alex revealed that Caroline Wren was the White House Contact.
Caroline Wren with funding from Publix Heiress Julie Jenkins Fancelli via Women for America First, obtained a permit for the rally featuring former president Donald Trump.
Caroline Wren
https://www.linkedin.com/in/carolinewren
Company website for Caroline Wren redirects to:
https://www.lindseygraham.com/
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Caroline Wren, president of BlueBonnet Fundraising
By POLITICO STAFF 10/10/2018 05:14 AM EDT
How/where are you celebrating your birthday and with whom?
“I have friends and family flying in from all over the country and @LoganDobson and I are having a joint birthday party at my house in D.C. on Friday including
(but not limited to) margarita machines, mariachi band, face painters, fog machine, mezcal bar, etc. @DaveCatanese is also expected to DJ for a portion of the evening.”
How did you get your start in politics?
“In 2007 for Christmas I asked my parents for a flight to New Hampshire to go and campaign forJohn McCain.
I showed up unannounced at the McCain New Hampshire HQ and luckily someone let me sleep on their floor and I spent a week waving McCain signs in the snow.
From then on I was hooked and ended up taking a semester off from Auburn University to work on the McCain campaign and I’ve been in politics ever since.”
What’s an interesting book/article you’re reading now or finished? And why?
“With the election less than a month away, I’m currently not reading anything other than Excel documents and direct mail copy.”
What is a trend going on in the U.S. or abroad that doesn’t get enough attention?
“The ‘Lindsey Graham for President 2024’ campaign :)”
How is the Trump presidency going?
“-3.7% unemployment … -Passed historic tax cuts … -Confirmed Gorsuch & Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court … -Massive rollback of unnecessary job-killing regulations … -
Recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital … -ended the War on Christmas. I’m not sick of winning.”
What’s a fun fact that people in Washington might not know about you?
“I love to travel and have visited over 35 countries including backpacking trips through Southeast Asia, Europe and the Middle East.”
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/10/playbook-birthday-caroline-wren-886200
Who is Ronna McDaniel a.k.a Ronna Romney?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronna_McDaniel
Who is Caroline Wren?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/carolinewren
Company website for Caroline Wren redirects to:
https://www.lindseygraham.com/
Who is Julie Jenkins Fancelli?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Fancelli
Do you not wonder why "Patriotic Anons" are not talking about the truth concerning JAN 06?
Colonel says Army punished him for claiming generals lied about Jan. 6
Jan. 3, 2024 at 6:19 pm Updated Jan. 3, 2024
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation-politics/colonel-says-army-punished-him-for-claiming-generals-lied-about-jan-6/
Army officer alleges reprisal for his account of Capitol riot response
Earl Matthews, a key figure in the Jan. 6 investigation, claims that, despite his qualifications for promotion, the Army has blocked his advancement.
By Dan Lamothe January 4, 2024
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/04/january-6-army-reprisal-claim/
Former D.C. Guard official accuses Army generals of lying to Congress about Jan. 6 response
In a 36-page memo, Col. Earl Matthews called the generals "absolute and unmitigated liars" for how they characterized events.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/former-d-c-guard-official-accuses-army-generals-lying-about-n1285423
Former Guard Official Says Army Retaliated for His Account
Jan 3, 2024 — A former top lawyer for the D.C. National Guard … Charles Flynn of being “absolute and unmitigated liars” in their testimony before Congress
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/03/us/politics/jan-6-national-guard-whistleblower-complaint.html
Army Officer Alleges Retaliation over Testimony on Slow National Guard Response to Jan. 6
A colonel who was the top lawyer for the D.C. National Guard during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection is accusing Army officials of retaliating against him for disputing two generals' account of why the National Guard was slow to deploy during the attack on the Capitol.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/01/04/army-officer-alleges-retaliation-over-testimony-slow-national-guard-response-jan-6.html
Ex-National Guard official says Army generals lied to Congress, alleging cover-up of decision to withhold troops from the Capitol on January 6
https://www.businessinsider.com/former-dc-guard-official-accuse-generals-lying-congress-january-6-2021-12
Former DC National Guard official accuses generals of lying about Capitol riot
In the memo, Matthews called Gen. Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, director of Army staff, “absolute and unmitigated liars” for their recollections of the Capitol riot.
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/584478-former-dc-national-guard-official-accuses-generals-of-lying-about-capitol-riot/
‘This call never happened’: Ex-D.C. Guard leaders push back as internal Army report on Jan. 6 emerges
The report’s narrative is surfacing days after POLITICO first revealed a memo from a former top Guard official accusing two generals of lying to Congress.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/09/guard-leaders-push-back-army-january-6-report-523995
''In early December 2021, Colonel Earl G. Matthews, a Trump appointee, released a rebuttal to the DoDIG report that accused LTG Piatt of making willful distortions of the events of January 6, describing Piatt and General Charles A. Flynn as "absolute and unmitigated liars" and of giving "perjured testimony before Congress."[18]
Fallout
Piatt was once the leading candidate to take over as the commanding general of United States Army Futures Command, and appointment to the rank of general.[19] He had received the recommendation from several top defense officials. However, he was rejected by President Biden[20] due to his handling of National Guard deployment during the January 6 attacks on the Capitol.[19][20] ''
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_E._Piatt
Jan 6 committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing Trump admin pushed for National Guard presence: report
Former Rep Liz Cheney's spokesperson says report 'flatly false'
By Emma Colton Fox NewsPublished March 10, 2024 1:43pm EDT
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jan-6-committee-allegedly-suppressed-testimony-showing-trump-admin-pushed-national-guard-presence-report
BREAKING: MAJOR REPUBLICAN LAW FIRM HOLTZMAN/VOGEL TEAMS WITH DEMOCRATS TO KEEP TRUMP OFF BALLOT!
@holtzmanvogel
Lawyer @JasonTorchinsky
Working With @TheDemocrats
To Keep @realDonaldTrump
Off The @GOP
Ballot!
Other Holtzman Clients Are @GOP
@NRSC
@NRCC
washingtonpost.com
GOP lawyer with ties to three Trump rivals enters 14th Amendment fray
Lawsuits seeking to bar former president Donald Trump from running for president under the 14th Amendment are expected in at least a dozen states.
6:16 PM · Sep 13, 2023
https://twitter.com/JohnBasham/status/1702083859628671109
Lawsuit alleging Trump fomented insurrection adds momentum to legal effort to block him from 2024 presidential ballot
Brandi Buchman Sep 13th, 2023, 1:03 pm
https://lawandcrime.com/trump/lawsuit-alleging-trump-fomented-insurrection-adds-momentum-to-legal-effort-to-block-him-from-2024-presidential-ballot/
Who is Ronna McDaniel a.k.a Ronna Romney?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronna_McDaniel
Who is Caroline Wren?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/carolinewren
Company website for Caroline Wren redirects to:
https://www.lindseygraham.com/
Who is Julie Jenkins Fancelli?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Fancelli
Alex Jones Reaches Out to Justice Dept. About Jan. 6 Interview
The effort by the Trump ally to get an immunity deal is the latest sign of progress in the investigation, which recently brought on a well-regarded prosecutor.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/20/us/politics/alex-jones-jan-6-interview.html
By Alan Feuer, Adam Goldman and Katie Benner
April 20, 2022
The federal investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election appears to be gaining traction, with the Justice Department having brought in a well-regarded new prosecutor to help run the inquiry
and a high-profile witness seeking a deal to provide information.
Alex Jones, the host of the conspiracy-driven media outlet Infowars and a key player in the pro-Trump “Stop the Steal” movement, is in discussions with the Justice Department about an agreement to detail
his role in the rally near the White House last Jan. 6 that preceded the attack on the Capitol.
Through his lawyer, Mr. Jones said he has given the government a formal letter conveying “his desire to speak to federal prosecutors about Jan. 6.”
The lawyer, Norm Pattis, maintained that Mr. Jones had not engaged in any “criminal wrongdoing” that day when — chanting slogans about 1776 — he helped lead a crowd of Trump supporters in a march to the Capitol
as violence was erupting.
As a condition of being interviewed by federal investigators, Mr. Jones, who is known for his rants about the “Deep State” and its supposed control over national affairs, has requested immunity from prosecution.
“He distrusts the government,” Mr. Pattis said.
While convincing federal prosecutors to grant him immunity could be an uphill climb for Mr. Jones, his discussions with the Justice Department suggest that the investigation into the postelection period could be gathering momentum.
Two weeks ago, another prominent Stop the Steal organizer, Ali Alexander, a close associate of Mr. Jones, revealed that he had received a subpoena from a federal grand jury that is
seeking information on a broad swath of people — rally planners, members of Congress and others close to former President Donald J. Trump — connected to political events that took place in the run-up to Jan. 6.
Mr. Alexander, who marched with Mr. Jones to the Capitol that day, has said that he intends to comply with the subpoena.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/20/us/politics/alex-jones-jan-6-interview.html
Alex Jones met with 1/6 committee and says he pleaded the Fifth ‘almost 100 times’
By Annie Grayer and Oliver Darcy, CNN Tue January 25, 2022
Right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones met virtually on Monday with the House select committee investigating the January 6 insurrection, he announced on his broadcast.
A source familiar with the investigation confirmed the meeting to CNN.
“I just had a very intense experience being interrogated by the January 6 committee,” Jones said on his broadcast on Monday. “They were polite, but they were dogged.”
Jones said that, by his lawyer’s count, he had pleaded the Fifth Amendment “almost 100 times” and that he had been told to do so “on advice of counsel.”
Jones said that while he had wanted to answer the questions, he was afraid to do so because he believes that the committee, specifically Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff of California, would twist his words,
and Jones said he had been afraid of not answering all questions correctly and potentially perjuring himself.
“The questions were overall pretty reasonable,” Jones said. “And I wanted to answer the questions, but at the same time it’s a good thing I didn’t,
because I’m the type that tries to answer things correctly even though I don’t know all the answers, and they can kind of claim that that’s perjury, because about half the questions I didn’t know the answer to.”
Jones said he had been shown “a bunch of emails” that he had not seen before. He also said he believes that the committee has gotten access to his phone because he was shown text messages from his phone,
including messages with January 6 rally organizers Cindy Chafian and Caroline Wren, who also have been subpoenaed by the committee.
“They have everything that’s already on my phones and things, because I saw my text messages to Caroline Wren and Cindy Chafian and some of the event organizers,” Jones said.
On his show, Jones shared that the panel had asked him repeatedly who his White House contact was to help with rally planning and organizing.
Jones said that Caroline Wren, a major fundraiser for the Donald Trump campaign, was his contact for rallies on January 5 and 6.
Jones suggested that Wren was with a group of officials at the Ellipse on January 6 who led him “to the back of the stage so we could then go and get around the crowd and go lead the march.”
Jones said he had sought to direct people to a spot near the Capitol where organizer Ali Alexander planned to hold a permitted rally. He said he did not support people going into the Capitol, which he called “so stupid and so dumb.”
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/25/politics/alex-jones-january-6-plead-fifth/index.html
Who financed Jan 06?
Caroline Wren
https://www.linkedin.com/in/carolinewren
Company website for Caroline Wren redirects to:
https://www.lindseygraham.com/
Julie Jenkins Fancelli
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Fancelli
Ronna McDaniel a.k.a Ronna Romney
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronna_McDaniel
Publix heiress, funder of Jan. 6 rally, gave $150,000 to GOP attorneys general association
By Beth Reinhard, Jacqueline Alemany and Tom Hamburger October 16, 2021 at 9:34 a.m. EDT
A wealthy Trump donor who helped finance the rally in Washington on Jan. 6 also gave $150,000 to the nonprofit arm of the Republican Attorneys General Association, records show, funds that a person familiar with the contribution said were intended in part to promote the rally.
The nonprofit organization paid for a robocall touting a march that afternoon to the U.S. Capitol to “call on Congress to stop the steal.”
On Dec. 29, Julie Jenkins Fancelli, daughter of the founder of the Publix grocery store chain, gave the previously undisclosed contribution to RAGA’s nonprofit Rule of Law Defense Fund, or RLDF,
records reviewed by The Washington Post show. On the same day, the records show that Fancelli gave $300,000 to Women for America First, the “Stop the Steal” group that obtained a permit for
the rally featuring former president Donald Trump.
Funding for the events in Washington that day is a focus of the House select committee investigating the violent riot at the U.S. Capitol that followed the rally.
The panel is also interested in the role state officials, including attorneys general, played in encouraging people to go to Washington on Jan. 6 and in supporting Trump’s efforts to overturn the election,
according to people familiar with the committee’s work.
The leaders of Women for America First have been subpoenaed by the committee, as has Caroline Wren, a Republican fundraiser who was listed on that group’s permit as a “VIP ADVISOR.”
Both of Fancelli’s donations were arranged by Wren, according to the records and the person with knowledge of the contributions, who like some others interviewed for this story spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.
“We have many questions about coordination and funding, and we are actively seeking records and testimony that will answer those questions,” said committee spokesman Tim Mulvey.
“Many witnesses are already engaging with the committee, and we expect cooperation to help us get the answers we’re seeking.”
The documents sought by the subpoenas sent to rally organizers were due Wednesday.
Fancelli, who is not involved in Publix business operations, did not respond to multiple requests seeking comment, and it is unclear if she knew about the robocall ahead of time.
In a statement to the Wall Street Journal, which reported in January that Fancelli had given approximately $300,000 to support the rally,
she said: “I am a proud conservative and have real concerns associated with election integrity, yet I would never support any violence, particularly the tragic and horrific events that unfolded on January 6th.”
Alex Jones, a far-right talk show host and conspiracy theorist who was involved in the Jan. 6 rally, has said that it cost “close to half a million dollars.”
He has also said a donor he did not identify paid for 80 percent of the rally.
In a statement to The Post, Wren’s lawyer said: “Ms. Wren, in her role as an event planner, assisted many others in providing and arranging for a professionally produced and
completely peaceful event at the White House Ellipse with hundreds of thousands of Americans who were in D.C. to lawfully exercise their first amendment rights, a primary pillar of American democracy.
Ms. Wren was not present at the United States Capitol or the Capitol Grounds on January 6th.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/publix-heiress-capitol-riot-wren < link has data mining so here is the root link
Jan 06 Bun of P-A-I-N
brought to you by NIGHT SHIFT & Carl's Jr.
Jan 06 Bun of P-A-I-N
brought to you by NIGHT SHIFT & Carl's Jr.
NIGHT SHIFT RADIO
All of [them]
noted