https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1789850803903111556
"A pediatric practice cannot survive…without doing most of the vaccines, if not all of them [on the CDC schedule]…that's the pressure that pediatricians are under…that explains [why] they…won't…look at the fact that these vaccines are causing a lot of harm."
Retired pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas describes during a Children's Health Defense (
@ChildrensHD
) interview how pediatric practices cannot survive financially without administering the CDC's "vaccine" schedule to patients due to their reliance on federal dollars. For his own practice, Thomas notes that when he (largely) stopped "vaccinating" his patients, he lost more than a million dollars in revenue per year.
Thomas notes there are multiple ways that pediatric practices earn federal dollars by "vaccinating" young children, including "admin fees," which one can think of as "a 'Thank you' for giving [a] shot" and handing out an accompanying VIS, or vaccine information sheet.
The retired pediatrician notes that for a two-month "Well Baby" visit, there's a DPT shot—which is three shots (three antigens)—a Hib (Haemophilus influenzae type B) shot, a Prevnar (Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) shot, a Hep B shot, a polio shot, and a rotavirus shot; all in, these amount to six shots and eight antigens. For the pediatrician, this amounts to $240. This figure can then be multiplied by 30 or 40, as that's how many newborns a pediatrician can expect to see in a month. That number is then multiplied again, as those babies are coming in repeatedly at two months, four months, six months, nine months, 12 months, 15 months, and age two.
"[I]t's a lot of visits," Thomas says. "And then there's the older kids that need boosters…"
Additionally, Thomas notes that "one of the main quality measures is how well you vaccinate." He says, "It has nothing to do with how healthy your kids are," and points out that when he studied his "vaxxed versus unvaxxed patients" he found that "the unvaxxed were so incredibly healthy—they rarely got sick. They rarely would end up in an emergency room or in an hospital with any chronic condition."
"So being unvaxxed results in very health kids who don't use a lot of medical dollars—every medical system should want that, but it's reversed…it's bizarre," Thomas adds.
As a result of this payment scheme, Thomas says a pediatric practice in the U.S. "cannot stay in business if you're not giving pretty close to the CDC schedule—it just doesn't pencil out economically at all."
Thomas goes on to say: "A pediatric practice cannot survive using insurance without doing most of the vaccines, if not all of them [on the CDC schedule]…and that's the pressure that pediatricians are under and…that explains the blinders that they just won't go there and look at the fact that these vaccines are causing a lot of harm."
https://twitter.com/SenseReceptor/status/1789721537261846682
Well, it's no longer as disturbing in the second case, as you can see right in these threads.
I hope you see what the opportunity is for all of us knowing all this now.
Which is why X was taken over when it was.
Question is: what will we do with it now?
https://twitter.com/joshua__b/status/1789733662176448627
🚨⚠️I CAN’T STRESS ENOUGH, IF THERE IS A VIDEO THAT YOU WATCH AND SHARE, THIS MUST BE IT!
🚨⚠️IT IS VERY IMPORTANT AND VERY CONCERNING.
Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse at the European Parliament for the ECI citizens initiative challenges the WHO on their pandemic treaty – opposing the imposition of a global dictatorship of WEF and Gates
Dr. Campbell shared a video from Health and Democracy Conference during 13th of September, 2023 at the EU Parliament in Strasbourg featuring Philipp Kruse's speech outlining the concerning power consolidation for a global health dictatorship.
The video highlights the WHO's (an organization influenced by the egos of the WEF and Bill Gates) corruption, lack of accountability, incompetence, insufficient qualifications, and limited experience
“We’re here today because we are all concerned by the WHO's strong pressure to extend its powers—its structural and its financial capacities—with a permanent effect over the sovereignty of the countries and over the self-determination of the people.
In May 2024, the 194 member states of the WHO will have their final vote on both of these international agreements. This process takes place behind closed doors and at a tremendous speed. It is not reported nor discussed in our newspapers, in our national parliaments, universities, nor in society.
There is no mechanism foreseen that will allow the people or the member states to challenge the assessment of the WHO whether it is the WHO's assessment about a public health emergency or their assessment with respect to certain measures or when it comes to the imposing of a regime for what they call vaccination as experimental as it might be.
There will be simply no stop button for none of the member states and not of course not for us the citizens.
So now, if we just look at it as a whole, this right of WHO to self declare, to auto-authorize itself, to claim a Public Health Emergency of international concern and to maintain it for as long as it wants.
# 2, to issue so-called recommendations that will be legally binding and that will be subject to a system of surveillance of the people - surveillance of the member states - then the total control and monopoly on information including the right of censorship and then the fact that there is no mechanism of control and of correction.
What do we have as a result?
It is very simple to say without the possibility of open debate, without the possibility of having different opinions, different hypothesis, different methods to be discussed on and at the table there will be no science and there will be ultimately no democracy and there will be no legal Court proceedings and no justice if the result is already predefined by one sole authority on this planet.
# 3 : It’s a basic principle not only of international law, not only of national constitutional law that we have - as human beings - the right to know what we consent to.
So if we ask ourselves have we been asked, have you been informed, about this process that is about to become reality the answer is “NO”! And there is one important distinction to be made between these two legal instruments.
The new pandemic treaty will be considered by WHO itself as a treaty and thereby shall be subject to a national process of debate and ratification but not so for the international Health regulations
The international Health regulations by definition of WHO's own writing when you read the International Health Regulations.
And what does that mean as a consequence?
There will be an automatic coming into force right after the vote in 2024, so far it is still 24 months but these 24 months have been reduced to 12 months only.
So that means that at the end after May 2025 the international Health regulations will become law automatically so we will not be asked.”
https://twitter.com/ImMeme0/status/1732116475882668493
>there is no "THEY" who set out to poison everyone in every way possible