Anonymous ID: c337d2 July 8, 2018, 6:44 p.m. No.2086456   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6470 >>6480 >>6510 >>6535 >>6598

>>2085305

 

Q said ((they)) can end this at any time by asking the question. MSM will never ask the question because it would awaken the public, which is their greatest fear. The media is their final stronghold. The media is the reason the public is still asleep. The media is the reason Q hasn't gone viral yet. The stage is set but the audience hasn't assembled because not enough people know about Q yet. To be taken seriously, there needs to be a news article about Q.

 

Q said they might have to force the question, quoting a post that linked to a highly negative article about Q. The implication is that Q would inject the question into the media, i.e. have a reporter write a positive/truthful "Who Is Q?" article.

 

There is no other way for Q to force the question without outside comms.

Any reporter that writes a positive article about Q is putting their life in danger. A giant target on their back. The fact that one exists at all likely means that it was one that Q "forced". Why is that article allowed to exist?

 

The article in question reads like an ad for Q. Autists and high IQ individuals are naturally averse to advertising. Compare this neutral Q article that also claims to have interviewed an 8chan moderator

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-q-phenomenon_2581642.html

 

with the only positive article about Q.

 

What is different? The positive article is flashy, it has photos, a video. It's exciting, convincing. It reads like an advertisement for Q. It reads like a team of people sat down and hand picked specific convincing/interesting pieces to draw people's attention and threw in a little disinformation to provide plausible deniability for those who wrote it. That is why it set off alarms for autists, who don't understand the importance of media and advertising in creating a narrative and controlling public opinion. Autists understand digging for facts. Digging for facts is important and played a huge role in the Great Awakening.

Anonymous ID: c337d2 July 8, 2018, 6:45 p.m. No.2086470   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6480 >>6510

>>2086456

>>2085305

 

The stage is set and Q+ has all the facts they need. What they don't have is the public's attention. The only thing they need is the public's attention. That is what the media can do that POTUS can't. He can't talk about Q because he needs to appear neutral for optics. Which means we can't ask him about Q. We can't ask Sarah Sanders about Q. Why would a reporter ask? They already know Q is real. That's why they're avoiding all mention of Q and the biggest intel drop in history.

 

At this stage in the game, their biggest fear is people finding out about Q.

Lurkers come on this board and click Catalog to find the threads. Newcomers come on this board and are completely confused because it looks nothing like reddit and twitter. What effect does a frozen catalog have on traffic to this board? Who is here now? People who know how to navigate the board. And newcomers who click the link to the bread can only see 1 bread at a time. Most lurkers click the notables and move on with their days.

 

If you wanted to control traffic to this board and contain this movement, you would freeze the catalog, make sure that newcomers and lurkers (i.e. the people on Twitter with lots of followers who come here for their ideas like Tracy Beanz etc. only see 1 bread at a time and make sure the notables are filled with lots of facts and nothing shiny for them to spread to people who don't already know about Q).

Anonymous ID: c337d2 July 8, 2018, 6:46 p.m. No.2086480   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6510 >>6548 >>6747 >>6765

>>2086470

>>2086456

>>3085305

 

Who decides what is newsworthy? Who decides what is notable? A few posts in the last couple of breads got lots of attention and replies but they are not in the notables. Why? One post out of 3+ was put in the notables for 1 bread with the description "Anon analysis". Not "the importance of media to our movement". Not "Analysis about Q forcing media to ask about the movement" etc.

 

I'm not a coder, but why hasn't the catalog frozen until now? The Leo Wanta facts? Are facts shiny? Will more facts on top of the mountain of facts that already exist, drive the narrative that we want and sway public opinion in our favor? Spread the word?

 

Again, I'm not a coder but why is the catalog still frozen after days? Has it ever frozen before? Still no explanation? If it's a glitch, glitches can easily be fixed. If it's an attack, then we need to know. Codemonkey needs to know. Does codemonkey know? Who would alert codemonkey?

 

The owner of this board singled out and attacked 1 person as a shill. One of 2-3 people pushing a shiny advertisement for Q that is left out of notables despite plenty of back and forth debate across 2-3 breads. Has that ever happened before? The 2-3 people had massive post numbers because there were massive replies to their posts and they were rebutting.

I posted all those questions because I had to ask questions. That is the brilliance of Q. That's how you get attention. You ask questions. I couldn't just spoon feed you all this because I would be attacked again but you guys weren't understanding. I am not linking the article. I am in no way affiliated with the article. I'm a normal human being. If it wasn't against the rules and wouldn't put me in danger, I would dox myself. I trust that Anons have enough discernment to be able to see my intentions. God Bless.

Anonymous ID: c337d2 July 8, 2018, 6:54 p.m. No.2086578   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6604 >>6623 >>6711 >>6725

>>2086548

that is not the article i was talking about.

i am (one of) the article fags

 

that article is not shiny and exciting. it has no photos and videos and very low interest level for the general public.

the big league politics article does. that's why it's being censored on here.

i don't trust anyone but God and myself. and i have no proof that this board isn't comped after the catalog has been frozen for days. just my opinion.

Anonymous ID: c337d2 July 8, 2018, 7:06 p.m. No.2086720   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2086604

>>2086623

 

autists are naturally averse to this article because it is an advertisement.

normies will eat it up. it is highly likely this is the article that Q forced the question on. otherwise, this reporter would be suicided by now. what reporter would write an article like that? it is the ONLY "who is q?" article. the only positive one. (epoch times is neutral/bland). it shows up in top 10 google results but is left out of the "news" section. why?

instead, it's being contained and censored.